Advertisement

Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

, Volume 52, Issue 11, pp 4189–4202 | Cite as

Effect of Open-Fire-Induced Damage on Brazilian Tensile Strength and Microstructure of Granite

  • Song Sha
  • Guan RongEmail author
  • Jun PengEmail author
  • Bowen Li
  • Zhijun Wu
Original Paper
  • 331 Downloads

Abstract

Deformation and stability of surrounding rock of a tunnel could be significantly affected by the fire accident-induced open-fire damage. In this study, the influence of open-fire damage on the P-wave velocity, Brazilian tensile strength (BTS), and the associated microstructure evolution of granite is investigated. The open-fire damage is generated by heating the rock sample with charcoal fire for 3 h prior to the subsequent tests. P-wave velocity of intact and heated specimens is measured. The microstructure of specimens with different distances to the open fire is observed utilizing a polarizing microscopy. Brazilian splitting tests on the heated specimens are then conducted combined with high-speed camera for monitoring the failure process. Both P-wave velocity and BTS are found to increase rapidly as the distance from the specimen to the open fire increases. When the distance between the specimen and the open fire is larger than 125 mm, the values of P-wave velocity and BTS tend to level off at the values of unheated specimen. The degradation of P-wave velocity and BTS with increasing open-fire damage is mainly attributed to the induced microcracks in the process of approaching the open fire. The trans-granular microcracking is found to be an effective indicator to evaluate the degree of open-fire damage. Two negative exponential models are proposed for the variation of the P-wave velocity and BTS with the damage distance from the specimen to the open fire. The proposed model is validated by the reasonable agreement between model predictions and experimental results.

Keywords

Open-fire damage P-wave velocity Brazilian strength tensile (BTS) Failure process Microscopic observation 

List of Symbols

\(\sigma_{\text{t}}\)

Brazilian tensile strength

P

Failure load

D

Diameter of disk specimen

t

Thickness of disk specimen

Vp

Predicted value of P-wave velocity

Vpi

Initial value of P-wave velocity

Vpm

Maximum increment of P-wave velocity

T

Predicted value of Brazilian tensile strength

Ti

Initial value of Brazilian tensile strength

Tm

Maximum increment of Brazilian tensile strength

d

Distance from the rock specimen to the open fire

n

Model parameter

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research work presented in this paper is in part supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 41772305, 51609178, and 51579189), the Nature Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Grant no. 2018CFB593), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant nos. 2015M582273 and 2018T110800). The authors are grateful to these financial supports.

References

  1. Akazawa T (1943) New test method for evaluating internal stress due to compression of concrete: the splitting tension test. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng 29:777–787Google Scholar
  2. Bauer SJ, Johnson B (1979) Effects of slow uniform heating on the physical properties of the Westerly and Charcoal granites. In: Proceedings of the 20th US symposium on rock mechanic, Austin, Texas: ASCE, New York, pp 7–18Google Scholar
  3. Cai M, Kaiser PK (2004) Numerical simulation of the Brazilian test and the tensile strength of anisotropic rocks and rocks with preexisting cracks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(3):450–451Google Scholar
  4. Carneiro FLLB (1943) A new method to determine the tensile strength of concrete. In: Proceedings of the 5th meeting of the Brazilian Association for Technical Rules, 3d section, pp 126–129 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  5. Chaki S, Takarli M, Agbodjan WP (2008) Influence of thermal damage on physical properties of a granite rock: porosity, permeability and ultrasonic wave evolutions. Constr Build Mater 22(7):1456–1461Google Scholar
  6. Chakrabarti B, Yates T, Lewry A (1995) Effect of fire damage on natural stonework in buildings. Constr Build Mater 10(7):539–544Google Scholar
  7. Chen S, Yue ZQ, Tham LG (2004) Digital image-based numerical modeling method for prediction of inhomogeneous rock failure. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(6):939–957Google Scholar
  8. Chen YL, Ni J, Shao W, Azzam R (2012) Experimental study on the influence of temperature on the mechanical properties of granite under uniaxial compression and fatigue loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 56(15):62–66Google Scholar
  9. Chen SW, Yang CH, Wang GB (2017) Evolution of thermal damage and permeability of Beishan granite. Appl Therm Eng 110:1533–1542Google Scholar
  10. Coviello A, Lagioia R, Nova R (2005) On the measurement of the tensile strength of soft rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(4):251–273Google Scholar
  11. Dan DQ, Konietzky H, Herbst M (2013) Brazilian tensile strength tests on some anisotropic rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 58(1):1–7Google Scholar
  12. Du SJ, Liu H, Zhi HT, Chen HH (2004) Testing study on mechanical properties of post-high-temperature granite. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 23(14):2359–2364Google Scholar
  13. Dwivedia RD, Goela RK, Prasada VVR, Sinha A (2008) Thermo-mechanical properties of Indian and other granites. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45(3):303–315Google Scholar
  14. Efimov VP (2009) The rock strength in different tension conditions. J Min Sci 45(6):569–575Google Scholar
  15. Fairhurst C (1964) On the validity of the ‘Brazilian’ test for brittle materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1(4):535–546Google Scholar
  16. Fuenkajorn K, Klanphumeesri S (2011) Laboratory determination of direct tensile strength and deformability of intact rocks. Geotech Test J 34(1):1–6Google Scholar
  17. Glover P, Baud P, Darot M, Meredith P, Boon SA, Ravalec ML, Zoussi S, Reuschlé T (1995) α/β phase transition in quartz monitored using acoustic emissions. Geophys J Int 120(3):775–782Google Scholar
  18. Homand-Etienne F, Houpert R (1989) Thermally induced microcracking in granites: characterization and analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 26(2):125–134Google Scholar
  19. Hooper JA (1971) The failure of glass cylinders in diametral compression. J Mech Phys Solids 19(4):179–200Google Scholar
  20. Hudson JA, Brown ET, Rummel F (1972) The controlled failure of rock discs and rings loaded in diametral compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 9(2):241–248Google Scholar
  21. Keshavarz M, Pellet FL, Loret B (2010) Damage and changes in mechanical properties of a gabbro thermally loaded up to 1000 °C. Pure Appl Geophys 167(12):1511–1523Google Scholar
  22. Lan HX, Martin CD, Hu B (2010) Effect of heterogeneity of brittle rock on micromechanical extensile behavior during compression loading. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 115(B1):1–14Google Scholar
  23. Lee DH, Juang CH, Lei IM (1996) High-temperature Brazilian test for tensile strength of metamorphic limestone. Geotech Test J 19(2):223–226Google Scholar
  24. Li DY, Wong LNY (2013) The Brazilian disk test for rock mechanics applications: review and new insights. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(2):269–287Google Scholar
  25. Liu S, Xu J (2014) Mechanical properties of Qinling biotite granite after high temperature treatment. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 71:188–193Google Scholar
  26. Liu XF, Zhang CL, Yuan SY, Fityus S, Sloan SW, Buzzi O (2016) Effect of high temperature on mineralogy, microstructure, shear stiffness and tensile strength of two Australian mudstones. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(9):3513–3524Google Scholar
  27. Lü C, Sun Q (2017) Electrical resistivity evolution and brittle failure of sandstone after exposure to different temperatures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(4):639–654Google Scholar
  28. Mónika H (2002) Change in sandstones of historical monuments exposed to fire or high temperature. Fire Technol 38(4):373–382Google Scholar
  29. Otto C, Kempka T (2015) Thermo-mechanical simulations confirm: temperature-dependent mudrock properties are nice to have in far-field environmental assessments of underground coal gasification. Energy Procedia 76:582–591Google Scholar
  30. Pandey P, Singh DP (1986) Deformation of a rock in different tensile tests. Eng Geol 22(3):281–292Google Scholar
  31. Peng J, Rong G, Cai M, Zhou CB (2015) A model for characterizing crack closure effect of rocks. Eng Geol 189:48–57Google Scholar
  32. Peng J, Rong G, Cai M, Yao MD, Zhou CB (2016a) Physical and mechanical behaviors of a thermal-damaged coarse marble under uniaxial compression. Eng Geol 200(12):88–93Google Scholar
  33. Peng J, Rong G, Cai M, Yao MD, Zhou CB (2016b) Comparison of mechanical properties of undamaged and thermal-damaged coarse marbles under triaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 83(4):135–139Google Scholar
  34. Peng J, Wong LNY, Teh CI (2017) Influence of grain size heterogeneity on strength and microcracking behavior of crystalline rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 122:1054–1073Google Scholar
  35. Ranjith PG, Viete DR, Chen BJ, Perera MSA (2012) Transformation plasticity and the effect of temperature on the mechanical behavior of Hawkesbury sandstone at atmospheric pressure. Eng Geol 151:120–127Google Scholar
  36. Rong G, Peng J, Yao MD, Jiang QH, Wong LNY (2018a) Effects of specimen size and thermal-damage on physical and mechanical behavior of a fine-grained marble. Eng Geol 232:46–55Google Scholar
  37. Rong G, Yao MD, Peng J, Sha S, Tan J (2018b) Influence of initial thermal cracking on physical and mechanical behaviour of a coarse marble: insights from uniaxial compression tests with acoustic emission monitoring. Geophys J Int 214(3):1886–1900Google Scholar
  38. Roy DG, Singh TN (2016) Effect of heat treatment and layer orientation on the tensile strength of a crystalline rock under Brazilian test condition. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(5):1663–1677Google Scholar
  39. Sellin P, Leupin OX (2013) The use of clay as an engineered barrier in radioactive-waste management—a review. Clay Clay Miner 61(6):477–498Google Scholar
  40. Shoko E, McLella B, Disks AL, Costa JCDD (2006) Hydrogen from coal: production and utilisation technologies. Int J Coal Geol 65(3–4):213–222Google Scholar
  41. Sirdesa NN, Singh TN, Ranjith PG, Singh R (2017) Effect of varied durations of thermal treatment on the tensile strength of red sandstone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(1):205–213Google Scholar
  42. Su HJ, Jing HW, Du MR, Wang C (2016) Experimental investigation on tensile strength and its loading rate effect of sandstone after high temperature treatment. Arab J Geosci 9(13):616Google Scholar
  43. Sun H, Sun Q, Deng WN, Zhang WQ, Lü C (2017) Temperature effect on microstructure and P-wave propagation in Linyi sandstone. Appl Therm Eng 115:913–922Google Scholar
  44. Sundberg J, Back PE, Christiansson R, Hokmark H, Landell M, Wrafter J (2009) Modelling of thermal rock mass properties at the potential sites of a Swedish nuclear waste repository. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(6):1042–1054Google Scholar
  45. Swab JJ, Yu J, Gamble R, Kilczewski S (2011) Analysis of the diametral compression method for determining the tensile strength of transparent magnesium aluminate spinel. Int J Fract 172(2):187–192Google Scholar
  46. Tullis J, Yund RA (1987) Transition from cataclastic flow to dislocation creep of feldspar: mechanisms and microstructures. Geology 15(7):606–609Google Scholar
  47. Ulusay R, Hudson JA (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. ISRM Commission on Testing Methods, AnkataGoogle Scholar
  48. Verma AK, Gautam P, Singh TN, Bajpai RK (2015) Discrete element modelling of conceptual deep geological repository for high-level nuclear waste disposal. Arab J Geosci 8(10):8027–8038Google Scholar
  49. Yanagidani T, Sano O, Terada M, Ito I (1978) The observation of cracks propagating in diametrically-compressed rock discs. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15(5):225–235Google Scholar
  50. Yang SQ, Hu B (2018) Creep and long-term permeability of a red sandstone subjected to cyclic loading after thermal treatments. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:2981–3004Google Scholar
  51. Yang SQ, Ranjitha PG, Jinga HW, Tiana WL, Ju Y (2017) An experimental investigation on thermal damage and failure mechanical behavior of granite after exposure to different high temperature treatments. Geothermics 65:180–197Google Scholar
  52. Yao MD, Rong G, Zhou CB, Peng J (2016) Effects of thermal damage and confining pressure on the mechanical properties of coarse marble. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(6):2043–2054Google Scholar
  53. Yavuz H, Demirdag S, Caran S (2010) Thermal effect on the physical properties of carbonate rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(1):94–103Google Scholar
  54. Yin TB, Li XB, Cao WZ, Xia KW (2015) Effects of thermal treatment on tensile strength of Laurentian granite using Brazilian test. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(6):2213–2223Google Scholar
  55. Yue ZQ, Chen S, Tham LG (2003) Finite element modeling of geomaterials using digital image processing. Comput Geotech 30(5):375–397Google Scholar
  56. Zeng YC, Su Z, Wu NY (2013) Numerical simulation of heat production potential from hot dry rock by water circulating through two horizontal wells at Desert Peak geothermal field. Energy 56:92–107Google Scholar
  57. Zhang YJ, Li ZW, Guo LL, Gao P, Jin XP, Xu TF (2014) Electricity generation from enhanced geothermal systems by oilfield produced water circulating through reservoir stimulated by staged fracturing technology for horizontal wells: a case study in Xujiaweizi area in Daqing Oilfield. China. Energy 78(C):788–805Google Scholar
  58. Zhang WQ, Sun Q, Hao SQ, Geng JS, Lü C (2016a) Experimental study on the variation of physical and mechanical properties of rock after high temperature treatment. Appl Therm Eng 98:1297–1304Google Scholar
  59. Zhang WQ, Sun Q, Hao SQ, Wang B (2016b) Experimental study on the thermal damage characteristics of limestone and underlying mechanism. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(8):2999–3008Google Scholar
  60. Zhao HB, Yin ZG, Shen JL (2009) Experimental study on effect of temperature on sandstone damage. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 28:2784–2788Google Scholar
  61. Zhao YS, Wan ZJ, Zhang Y, Zhang N, Feng ZJ, Dong FK, Wu JW, Qu F (2010) Experimental study of related laws of rock thermal cracking and permeability. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29(10):1970–1976Google Scholar
  62. Zhao ZH, Liu ZN, Pu H, Li X (2018) Effect of thermal treatment on Brazilian tensile strength of granites with different grain size distributions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(4):1293–1303Google Scholar
  63. Zhu WC, Tang CA (2006) Numerical simulation of Brazilian disk rock failure under static and dynamic loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(2):236–252Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering ScienceWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering, Ministry of EducationWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  3. 3.School of Civil EngineeringWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations