Advertisement

Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

, Volume 52, Issue 11, pp 4273–4286 | Cite as

Experimental Investigation on Mechanical and Acoustic Parameters of Different Depth Shale Under The Effect of Confining Pressure

  • Guanghui Jiang
  • Jianping ZuoEmail author
  • Yulin Li
  • Xu Wei
Original Paper
  • 145 Downloads

Abstract

Investigations on the effects of confining pressure and burial depth on mechanical and acoustic parameters are significant for studying the deep shale deformation, failure rule, and hydraulic fracturing. Shale specimens at six different depth levels ranging from 1535 to 1635 m have been collected from a shale gas well in southwest China. RTR-1000 rapid rock triaxial testing system has been applied to carry out the mechanical and acoustic experiments with 19 shale specimens. The experimental results revealed that the peak deviatoric stress, peak axial strain, peak volumetric strain, residual stress, and axial wave velocity are directly proportional to confining pressure and burial depth, whereas elastic modulus is not affected much by both confining pressure and burial depth and the Poisson ratio decreases with the increase of confining pressure. In the burial depth range 1535–1635 m, the variation of Poisson’s ratio is not obvious with the depth changes, and their relationship has high randomicity. The Wave velocity Anisotropy of tested shale is greatly affected by the degree of stratification development rather than the corresponding crustal stress. The coefficient of variation and the degree of stratification development are inversely proportional to burial depth. The axial wave velocity of shale is closely related to the loading process. In the compaction stage, wave velocity increases rapidly with the increase of strain. And in the elastic yielding stage, wave velocity increases slowly along with the strain build-up. This study will help to deepen the understanding of the physical and mechanical properties of Wuxi shale and guide the shale gas exploitation in China.

Keywords

Confining pressure Burial depth Wuxi Shale Mechanical parameter Acoustic parameter 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41877257, 51622404 and 11572343), Yueqi Outstanding Scholar Award Program by CUMTB, the State Key Research Development Program of China (2016YFC0801404) and Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist. The authors would also like to thank Lei Liu from the University of South Australia, for the English writing check.

References

  1. Bowker KA (2007) Barnett Shale gas production, fort worth basin: issues and discussion. AAPG bulletin 91(4):523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bustin RM (2005) Gas shale tapped for big pay. AAPG Explorer 26(2):5–7Google Scholar
  3. Chen JG, Gao LS (1989) In-situ stress, rock stratum in situ strength and Chinese stress field. Acta Seismol Sin 11(2):142–152 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  4. Curtis JB (2002) Fractured shale-gas systems. AAPG Bulletin 86(11):1921–1938Google Scholar
  5. Curtis JB, Montgomery SL (2002) Recoverable natural gas resource of the United States: summary of recent estimates. AAPG Bulletin 86(10):1671–1678Google Scholar
  6. Eshelby JD (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems[C]//proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences. The Royal Society 241(1226):376–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan BJ, Shi L, Pang XQ (2011) Accumulation characteristics and prospecting area conditions of shale. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency 18(6):9–13 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  8. Fildani A, Hanson AD, Chen ZZ, Moldowan JM, Graham SA, Arriola PR (2005) Geochemical characteristics of oil and source rocks and implications for petroleum systems, Talara basin, northwest Peru. AAPG Bulletin 89(11):1519–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill DG, Lombardi TE (2002) Fractured gas shale potential in New York. Arvada, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiang CG, Jiang ZB, Liu H, Liao MQ (2004) Study on relation between the rock mechanical parameters of the Granite and its covered depth. Stone 7:4–6 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  11. Jiang XW, Wan L, Wang XS, Wu X, Cheng HH (2009a) Estimation of depth-dependent hydraulic conductivity and deformation modulus using RQD. Rock and Soil Mechanics 30(10):3163–3167 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  12. Jiang XW, Wan L, Wang XS, Liang SH, Hu BX (2009b) Estimation of fracture normal stiffness using a transmissivity-depth correlation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(1):51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang GH, Zuo JP, Li LY, Ma T, Wei X (2018) The evolution characteristic of cracks in Maluanshan granite subjected to different temperature processing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:1683–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li JR, Li HB (2001) Experimental study on mechanical property of rock in different depth. Chin J Rock Mechan Eng 20:948–951 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  15. Liang F, Bai WH, Zou CN, Wang HY, Wu J, Ma C, Zhang Q, Guo W, Sun SS, Zhu YM, Cui HY, Liu DX (2016) Shale gas enrichment pattern and exploration significance of Well WuXi-2 in northeast Chongqing, NE Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration & Development 43(3):386–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manger KC, Curtis JB (1991) Geologic influences on location and production of Antrim Shale gas. Devonian Gas Shales Technology Review (GRI) 7(2):5–16Google Scholar
  17. Milici RC, Swezey C (2006) Assessment of appalachian basin oil and gas resources: Devonian shale-middle and upper Paleozoic total petroleum system. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Open-File Report Series 2006-1237, pp 1–70Google Scholar
  18. Pollastro RM, Jarvie DM, Hill RJ, Adams CW (2007) Geologic framework of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Barnett-Paleozoic total petroleum system, Bend arch Fort Worth Basin, Texas. AAPG Bulletin 91(4):405–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rimmer SM, Cantrell DJ, Gooding PJ (1993) Rock-Eval pyrolysis and vitrinite reflectance trends in the Cleveland Shale Member of the Ohio Shale, eastern Kentucky. Org Geochem 20(6):735–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wu YQ (2000) Research on the law of porosity of rock with depth. Journal of Xi’an University of Technology 16(1):6–8 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  21. Zhang JC, Jin ZJ, Yuan MS (2004) Reservicing mechanism of shale gas and its distribution. Nat Gas Ind 24(7):51–58 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  22. Zhou HW, Xie HP, Zuo JP, Du SH, Man K, Yan CY (2010) Experimental study of the effect of depth on mechanical parameters of rock. Chinese Sci Bull (Chinese Ver) 55:3276–3284 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zuo JP, Chai NB, Zhou HW (2011) Study on the effect of buried depth on failure and energy characteristics of Basalt. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering 7(6):1174–1180 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  24. Zuo JP, Wang JT, Sun YJ, Chen Y, Jiang GH, Li YH (2017) Effects of thermal treatment on fracture characteristics of granite from Beishan, a possible high-level radioactive waste disposal site in China. Eng Fract Mech 182:425–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guanghui Jiang
    • 1
  • Jianping Zuo
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yulin Li
    • 1
  • Xu Wei
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanics and Civil EngineeringChina University of Mining and TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe MiningChina University of Mining and TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations