Advertisement

Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

, Volume 52, Issue 11, pp 4339–4359 | Cite as

Experiment and Discrete Element Modelling on Strength, Deformation and Failure Behaviour of Shale Under Brazilian Compression

  • Sheng-Qi YangEmail author
  • Peng-Fei Yin
  • Yan-Hua Huang
Original Paper

Abstract

Bedding planes or layers can have a serious effect on the mechanical behaviour of shale rock. Fractures occurring along bedding planes form a fracture network in shale hydraulic fracturing; thus, the tensile strength and fracture mode are important for hydraulic fracturing design. In this research, shale disk specimens are prepared and analysed under Brazilian test conditions. During the test, a 3D digital image correlation system (DIC) is employed to capture surface deformation, and an AE sensor and strain observation system are, respectively, used to record the AE event and central strain of the shale disk during the failure process. A new inherently anisotropic model is established with a banded-particle model and smooth joint model using the particle flow code (PFC2D). The laboratory test result shows that the Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) value decreased gradually along with bedding inclination, which corresponds to a trend of the decrease of the strength over the entire interval, but it is a rather systematic decrease, approximating a linear variation. By considering the specimen after failure, three types of fracture patterns are observed: arc fracture (AF) through outside the central part, central fracture along the loading direction (LA) and mixed fracture patterns of the two. The DIC and central strain observation systems confirm that the split fractures do not always propagate along the diametrical loading direction, which means that the traditional isotropic elastic theory no longer works for layered shale. The micro-level failure behaviour and mechanism are analysed by PFC simulation. The PFC simulation reveals that the rock matrix tensile fracture and shear fracture along bedding plane are the main fracture pattern of shale disk specimens under the Brazilian test. The bedding inclination and interlayer bonding force play a very important role in the anisotropic behaviour of the shale.

Keywords

Shale Brazilian test Inherent anisotropy Failure mode 3D digital image correlation system Particle flow code 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015XKZD05) and Six Talents Peak Project in Jiangsu Province (JNHB-090). The authors would also like to express their sincere gratitude to the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments which have greatly improved this paper.

References

  1. Bahaaddini M, Sharrock G, Hebblewhite B (2013) Numerical investigation of the effect of joint geometrical parameters on the mechanical properties of a non-persistent jointed rock mass under uniaxial compression. Comput Geotech 49:206–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berard T, Liu Q, Dubost FX, Jing B (2012) A screening process for shale gas prospecting. SPE Pap 154736:19Google Scholar
  3. Chiu C, Wang TT, Wen MC, Huang TH (2013) Modeling the anisotropic behavior of jointed rock mass using a modified smooth-joint model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 62:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cho N, Martin CD, Sego DC (2007) A clumped particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(7):997–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho JW, Kim H, Jeon S, Min KB (2012) Deformation and strength anisotropy of Asan gneiss, Boryeong shale, and Yeoncheon schist. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chu WJ, Zhang CS, Hou JA (2013) Particle-based model for studying anisotropic strength and deformation of schist. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ISRM SINOROCK symposium. Shanghai, China, pp 593–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cundall PA (1971) A computer model for simulating progressive large scale movements in blocky rock systems. In: Proceedings of the symposium of International Society of Rock Mechanics, vol. 1, Nancy: France, paper no. II-8Google Scholar
  8. Cundall PA (2001) Discontinuous future for numerical modelling in geomechanics? Proc ICE Geotech Eng 149:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dan DQ, Konietzky H (2014) Numerical simulations and interpretations of Brazilian tensile tests on transversely isotropic rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 71(4):53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Debecker B, Vervoort A (2009) Experimental observation of fracture patterns in layered slate. Int J Fract 159(1):51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duan K, Kwok CY (2015) Discrete element modeling of anisotropic rock under Brazilian test conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 78:46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duan K, Kwok CY, Pierce M (2016) Discrete element method modeling of inherently anisotropic rocks under uniaxial compression loading. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 40(8):1150–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hakala M, Kuula H, Hudson JA (2007) Estimating the transversely isotropic elastic intact rock properties for in situ stress measurement data reduction: a case study of the Olkiluoto mica gneiss, Finland. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:14–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He J, Afolagboye LO (2018) Influence of layer orientation and interlayer bonding force on the mechanical behavior of shale under Brazilian test conditions. Acta Mech Sin 34(2):349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heng S, Guo Y, Yang C, Daemen JJK, Li Z (2015) Experimental and theoretical study of the anisotropic properties of shale. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 74(1):58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Itasca Consulting Group Inc (2008) Particle flow code in 2 dimensions. Version 4.0. Itasca Consulting Group Inc, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  17. Josh M, Esteban L, Piane CD, Sarout J, Dewhurst DN, Clennell MB (2012) Laboratory characterisation of shale properties. J Petrol Sci Eng 88–89(2):107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim H, Cho JW, Song I, Min KB (2012) Anisotropy of elastic moduli, p-wave velocities, and thermal conductivities of Asan gneiss, Boryeong shale, and Yeoncheon schist in Korea. Eng Geol 147–148(5):68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuila U, Dewhurst DN, Siggins AF, Raven MD (2011) Stress anisotropy and velocity anisotropy in low porosity shale. Tectonophysics 503(1–2):34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li X, Lei X, Li Q, Li X (2017) Experimental investigation of sinian shale rock under triaxial stress monitored by ultrasonic transmission and acoustic emission. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 43:110–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Masri M, Sibai M, Shao JF, Mainguy M (2014) Experimental investigation of the effect of temperature on the mechanical behavior of Tournemire shale. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70(9):185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nasseri MH, Rao KS, Ramamurthy T (1997) Failure mechanism in schistose rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(3–4):219Google Scholar
  23. Nasseri MH, Rao KS, Ramamurthy T (2003) Anisotropic strength and deformational behavior of Himalayan schists. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Niandou H, Shao JF, Henry JP, Fourmaintraux D (1997) Laboratory investigation of the mechanical behavior of Tournemire shale. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(1):3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Park B, Min KB (2012) Discrete element modeling of shale as a transversely isotropic rock. In: Proceedings of 7th Asian rock mechanics symposium. Seoul, Korea, pp 336–342Google Scholar
  26. Park B, Min KB (2013) Discrete element modeling of transversely isotropic rock. In: Proceedings of 47th US rock mechanics symposium. San Francisco, US, Paper ARMA13-490Google Scholar
  27. Park B, Min KB (2015) Bonded-particle discrete element modeling of mechanical behavior of transversely isotropic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 76:243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rybacki E, Reinicke A, Meier T, Makasi M, Dresen G (2015) What controls the mechanical properties of shale rocks?—part I: strength and Young’s modulus. J Petrol Sci Eng 135:702–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rybacki E, Meier T, Dresen G (2016) What controls the mechanical properties of shale rocks?—part II: brittleness. J Petrol Sci Eng 144:39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tan X, Konietzky H, Fruhwirt T, Dan DQ (2015) Brazilian tests on transversely isotropic rocks: laboratory testing and numerical simulations. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1341–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tavallali A, Vervoort A (2010a) Effect of layer orientation on the failure of layered sandstone under Brazilian test conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tavallali A, Vervoort A (2010b) Failure of layered sandstone under brazilian test conditions: effect of micro-scale parameters on macro-scale behaviour. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tavallali A, Vervoort A (2013) Behaviour of layered sandstone under Brazilian test conditions: layer orientation and shape effects. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5:366–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ulusay R (ed) (2014) The ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 2007–2014. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  35. Vervoort A, Min KB, Konietzky H, Cho JW et al (2014) Failure of transversely isotropic rock under Brazilian test conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang FP, Gale JFW (2009) Screeing criteria for shale-gas systems. Gulf Coast Ass Geol Soc Trans 59:779–793Google Scholar
  37. Wang J, Xie L, Xie H, Ren L, He B, Li C et al (2016a) Effect of layer orientation on acoustic emission characteristics of anisotropic shale in Brazilian tests. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 36:1120–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang T, Xu DP, Elsworth D, Zhou WB (2016b) Distinct element modeling of strength variation in jointed rock masses under uniaxial compression. Geomech Geophys Geo-energy Geo-resour 2:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu S, Ge H, Wang X, Meng F (2017) Shale failure processes and spatial distribution of fractures obtained by ae monitoring. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 41:82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang SQ, Huang YH (2014) Particle flow study on strength and meso-mechanism of Brazilian splitting test for jointed rock mass. Acta Mech Sin 30(4):547–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang SQ, Huang YH, Jing HW, Liu XR (2014) Discrete element modeling on fracture coalescence behavior of red sandstone containing two unparallel fissures under uniaxial compression. Eng Geol 178:28–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang SQ, Tian WL, Huang YH (2018) Failure mechanical behavior of pre-holed granite specimens after elevated temperature treatment by particle flow code. Geothermics 72:124–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yang SQ, Tian WL, Jing HW, Huang YH, Yang XX, Meng B (2019) Deformation and damage failure behavior of mudstone specimens under single-stage and multi-stage triaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(3):673–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yin PF, Yang SQ (2018) Experimental investigation of the strength and failure behavior of layered sandstone under uniaxial compression and Brazilian testing. Acta Geophys 4(66):585–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, School of Mechanics and Civil EngineeringChina University of Mining and TechnologyXuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations