Advertisement

Risk Evaluation, Design, Implementation, Instrumentation, and Verification for Crown Pillar Extraction at Pinos Altos Mine

  • K. KalenchukEmail author
  • V. Falmagne
  • A. Gelover
  • I. Montiel
  • J. Luzania
Original Paper
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

The Santo Niño ore body at Pinos Altos Mine has been in production since 2009 using both open pit and underground mining methods. Between 2015 and 2017, an extensive study evaluated extraction strategy of the Santo Niño crown pillar. The Agnico Eagle project team evaluated geomechanical, operational, safety and economical risks before developing a comprehensive plan to extract the Santo Niño crown pillar by underground stoping. The geomechanical aspects of that study focused on interpreting in situ rock mass conditions and understanding the mechanical and hydrological/hydrogeological mechanisms influencing ground reaction during open pit and underground mine operations to make meaningful forward predictions for crown pillar extraction. Numerical modeling played a significant role in making forward predictions. To minimize uncertainty in those predictions, the model parameters were calibrated using measured pit slope deformations, back analysis of historical slope instabilities and underground observations of rock mass conditions. Ultimately, it was decided that long-hole stoping would be utilized for crown pillar extraction. The pit floor would be used as a drilling horizon, and the upper most level of the underground operations served as the mucking horizon. Various safety and operational risk mitigation strategies were developed and implemented; this included geomechanical monitoring using the in-pit radar system and numerous borehole extensometers installed underground to monitor ground deformations. The calibrated numerical model results provided valuable input for the design of the instrumentation program, and once the crown pillar came into production in late 2017, the instrumentation provided valuable data for model verification and stope design adjustments.

Keywords

Crown pillar Numerical modeling Risk assessment Mining Instrumentation Ground monitoring 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Pinos Altos engineering and ground control teams as well as the pit and underground production teams and the health and safety department for their support and dedication to excellence and safety throughout the crown pillar recovery project. We also express our gratitude to Pinos Altos and Agnico Eagle Mexico management for their support and permission to publish this paper. Thank you for the paper reviews.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

None.

References

  1. Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited Staff (2010) Geology of the Pinos Altos Gold-Silver Mine in Chihuahua State, Mexico. In: Society of Economic Geologist (ed) Northern Sierra Madre Occidental Gold-Silver Mines, Mexico. Field Trip GuidebookGoogle Scholar
  2. Duquette D, Grondin L, Matte P, Prince C (2009) Pinos altos gold-silver mining project chihuahua state Mexico. Technical Report on the Mineral Resources and Reserves as of December 31, 2008Google Scholar
  3. Hawley M, Marisett S, Beal G, Stacey P (2009) Chapter 12 performance assessment and monitoring. In: Read J, Stacey P (eds) Guidelines for open pit slope design. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 327–380Google Scholar
  4. Hoek E, Carranze-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion—2002 Edition. In: Hammah R (ed) Proc. NARMS-TAC conference. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 267–273Google Scholar
  5. Itasca (2013) FLAC3D (Fast lagrangian analysis of continua in 3 dimensions) version 5.01. Itasca consulting group Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnson S, Paterson S, Fletcher J, Girty G, Kimbrough D, Martin-Barajas A (2003) Tectonic evolution of northwestern Mexico and southwestern USA. Geological Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalenchuk K, Falmagne V, Gelover A, Montiel I, Luzania J (2018) Crown pillar extraction at Pinos Altos Mine–geomechanical aspects of risk evaluation, design and implementation. In: 52nd annual US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. Seattle. paper # 18–655, p 9Google Scholar
  8. SRK Consulting (2016) 3-D numerical model west ramp assessment report santo niño pit chihuahua Mexico. Technical Report Prepared for Agnico Eagle MexicoGoogle Scholar
  9. Terzaghi K (1936) The shear resistance of saturated soils and the angle between planes of shear In Proc Int Conf Soil Mech Found Eng 1. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 54–56Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Kalenchuk
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. Falmagne
    • 2
  • A. Gelover
    • 3
  • I. Montiel
    • 3
  • J. Luzania
    • 3
  1. 1.MDEngKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Agnico Eagle MinesRouyn-NorandaCanada
  3. 3.Agnico Eagle MexicoChihuahuaMexico

Personalised recommendations