Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Open and endovascular elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a real-world experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To present a real-world experience of the elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) using both open repair (OR) and endovascular repair (EVAR).

Methods

Data from patients treated consecutively between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2014 were collected retrospectively and reviewed. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and complication rates, freedom from reintervention, and survival in the long-term.

Results

We analyzed data on 1112 patients (660 EVAR, 452 OR). The 30-day mortality and complications rates were higher after OR than after EVAR (2.9 vs. 1.1%, P = .03 and 24.7 vs. 1.1%, P < .0001, respectively). At 10 years, survival was 66.1 ± 3.2% after OR and 78.1 ± 2.2% after EVAR (P = .0006) and freedom from reintervention was 93.5 ± 1.8% after OR and 88.4 ± 1.8% after EVAR (P = .005). The preoperative aneurysm diameter was significantly associated with the development of type Ia endoleaks after EVAR (P < .0001) and of a proximal pseudoaneurysm after OR (P < .0001).

Conclusion

In the long-term, EVAR was associated with higher reintervention rates, but better survival than OR. The preoperative AAA diameter was the most important predictor of the development of endoleaks after EVAR and proximal pseudoaneurysm after OR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paravastu SC, Jayarajasingam R, Cottam R, Palfreyman SJ, Michaels JA, Thomas SM. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD004178.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemitsu Y, Masuda N, et al. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46(6):668–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaikof EL, Brewster DC, Dalman RL, Makaroun MS, Illig KA, Sicard GA, et al; Society for Vascular Surgery. The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:S2–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dalainas I, Nano G, Casana R, Tealdi Dg. Mid-term results after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a four-year experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:319–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vallabhaneni R, Farber MA, Schneider F, Ricco JB. Debate: whether young, good-risk patients should be treated with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:1709–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kyriakides TC, Lederle F, Freischlag J. Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the OVER trial. Clin Trials. 2004;1(Suppl 1):212.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang DC, Parina RP, Wilson SE. Survival after endovascular vs open aortic aneurysm repairs. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:1160–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Toya N, Ohki T, Momokawa Y, Shukuzawa K, Fukushima S, Tachihara H, et al. Risk factors for early renal dysfunction following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and its effect on the postoperative outcome. Surg Today. 2016;46(12):1362–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haga M, Hoshina K, Shigematsu K, Watanabe T. A perioperative strategy for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Surg Today. 2016;46(9):1062–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diehm N, Dick F, Katzen BT, Schmidli J, Kalka C, Baumgartner I. Aortic neck dilatation after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a word of caution. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:886–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Donato G, Setacci F, Bresadola L, Castelli P, Chiesa R, Mangialardi N, et al; TriVascular Ovation Italian Study. Aortic neck evolution after endovascular repair with TriVascular Ovation stent graft. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Mazzaccaro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Daniela Mazzaccaro and her co-authors have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

D. Mazzaccaro and G. Nano shared first authorship.

P. G. Settembrini: SVS Member.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazzaccaro, D., Nano, G., Settembrini, A.M. et al. Open and endovascular elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a real-world experience. Surg Today 47, 1347–1355 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1525-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1525-7

Keywords

Navigation