Advertisement

The β-cell effect of verapamil-based treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review

  • Carla CarnovaleEmail author
  • Alice Dassano
  • Giulia Mosini
  • Faizan Mazhar
  • Francesca D’Addio
  • Marco Pozzi
  • Sonia Radice
  • Paolo Fiorina
  • Emilio Clementi
Review Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Aims

The possibility that verapamil has new beneficial effects in diabetic patients in terms of an improvement in glycometabolic control has been put forward recently in several studies. However, to date the issue is still under debate. We conducted the first systematic review examining the impact of verapamil-based treatment on glycometabolic outcomes, in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 9 October 2018, for all studies evaluating whether verapamil-based treatment is associated with changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose levels, glucose and C-peptide areas from baseline in humans, without restrictions for study type.

Results

Plasma glucose levels were lowered significantly by verapamil-based treatment in patients with T2D (mean change − 13 ± 5.29; P = 0.049); HbA1c values were instead not affected by the drug (mean change − 0.10 ± 0.12; P = 0.453). In five studies, groups exposed to verapamil achieved lower value of glycometabolic outcomes: comparison with values recorded in control groups showed a significant difference, in terms of both HbA1c and plasma glucose levels.

Conclusions

Despite the fact that plasma glucose levels were lowered significantly by verapamil-based treatment in patients with T2D (the HbA1c values were not affected by the drug), the clinical significance of the glycometabolic response induced by verapamil-based treatment remains unclear due to the high variety of sample size and type of studies presently available. Further experimental and clinical trials are needed to clarify unambiguously the role of verapamil in metabolic control.

Keywords

Glycometabolic control HbA1c FPG Diabetes Calcium channel blockers Verapamil 

Abbreviations

CCB

Calcium channel blocker

FPG

Fasting plasma glucose

HbA1c

Haemoglobin A1c, A1C, glycosylated haemoglobin, glycated haemoglobin, glycol-haemoglobin

Rob

Risk of bias

T2D

Type 2 diabetes

TXNIP

Thioredoxin-interacting protein

Notes

Acknowledgements

Faizan Mazhar is supported by the 33rd cycle Ph.D. programme in “Scienze Farmacologiche Sperimentali e Cliniche”, Università degli Studi di Milano.

Author contribution

CC conceptualised and designed the study, carried out the data extraction and statistical analyses, drafted the manuscript and the summary tables, revised and approved the final manuscript as submitted; AD, GM and FM contributed to literature extraction and manuscript revision and approved the final manuscript as submitted; FD, MP and SR participated in the conceptualisation and design of the study, participated in the analysis of the data, revised the article, and approved the final article as submitted. PF and EC contributed to concept and design of the study, participated in the analysis and interpretation of the data, coordinated and supervised data collection, critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Funding

The financial support by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA), by the Centre of Pharmacovigilance of Regione Lombardia (MEAP project, Monitoraggio degli Eventi Avversi nelle Popolazioni a Rischio, to EC), by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 2018, to MP) is gratefully acknowledged. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Supplementary material

592_2019_1370_MOESM1_ESM.tif (259 kb)
Supplementary Figure 1 Summary of the risk-of-bias assessment, according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool. (TIFF 259 kb)
592_2019_1370_MOESM2_ESM.doc (64 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 64 kb)
592_2019_1370_MOESM3_ESM.docx (132 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 132 kb)
592_2019_1370_MOESM4_ESM.docx (64 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 63 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Halban PA, Polonsky KS, Bowden DW et al (2014) Beta-cell failure in type 2 diabetes: postulated mechanisms and prospects for prevention and treatment. Diabetes Care 37(6):1751–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mandrup-Poulsen T (2001) Beta-cell apoptosis: stimuli and signaling. Diabetes 50(1):S58–S63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cha-Molstad H, Xu G, Chen J et al (2012) Calcium channel blockers act through nuclear factor Y to control transcription of key cardiac genes. Mol Pharmacol 82(3):541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen J, Cha-Molstad H, Szabo A, Shalev A (2009) Diabetes induces and calcium channel blockers prevent cardiac expression of proapoptotic thioredoxin-interacting protein. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 296(5):E1133–E1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu G, Chen J, Jing G, Shalev A (2012) Preventing b-cell loss and diabetes with calcium channel blockers. Diabetes 61(4):848–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carvalho DS, Aparecido de Almeida A, Ferreira Borges A, Vannucci C (2018) Treatments for diabetes mellitus type II: new perspectives regarding the possible role of calcium and cAMP interaction. Eur J Pharmacol 830:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khodneva Y, Shalev A, Frank SJ, Carson AP, Safford MM (2016) Calcium channel blocker use is associated with lower fasting serum glucose among adults with diabetes from the REGARDS study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 115:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holzgreve H, Nakov R, Beck K, Janka HU (2003) Antihypertensive therapy with verapamil SR plus trandolapril versus atenolol plus chlorthalidone on glycemic control. Am J Hypertens 16(5 Pt 1):381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper-Dehoff R, Cohen JD, Bakris GL et al (2006) Predictors of development of diabetes mellitus in patients with coronary artery disease taking antihypertensive medications (findings from the INternational VErapamil SR-Trandolapril STudy [INVEST]). Am J Cardiol 98(7):890–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooper-DeHoff RM, Aranda JM Jr, Gaxiola E et al (2006) Blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk Hispanic patients–findings from the International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study (INVEST). Am Heart J 151(5):1072–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yin T, Kuo SC, Chang YY, Chen YT, Wang KK (2017) Verapamil use is associated with reduction of newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102(7):2604–2610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bergantin LB, Souza CF, Ferreira RM et al (2013) Novel model for “calcium paradox” in sympathetic transmission of smooth muscles: role of cyclic AMP pathway. Cell Calcium 54(3):202–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caricati-Neto A, García AG, Bergantin LB (2015) Pharmacological implications of the Ca2+/cAMP signaling interaction: from risk for antihypertensive therapy to potential beneficial for neurological and psychiatric disorders. Pharmacol Res Perspect 3(5):e00181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bergantin LB, Jurkiewicz A, García AG, Caricati-Neto A (2015) A calcium paradox in the context of neurotransmission. J Pharm Pharmacol 3:253–261Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elliott WJ, Ram CV (2011) Calcium channel blockers. J Clin Hypertens 13(9):687–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akhtar M, Tchou P, Jazayeri M (1989) Use of calcium channel entry blockers in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Circulation 80(6):IV31-9Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Capobianco DJ, Dodick DW (2006) Diagnosis and treatment of cluster headache. Semin Neurol 26(2):242–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pelzer N, Stam AH, Haan J, Ferrari MD, Terwindt GM (2013) Familial and sporadic hemiplegic migraine: diagnosis and treatment. Curr Treat Opt Neurol 15(1):13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Angeli F et al (2004) Adverse prognostic significance of new diabetes in treated hypertensive subjects. Hypertension 43(5):963–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prospero International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/. Accessed 2 June 2018
  21. 21.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Higgins JPT, Sterne JAC, Savovic J et al (2016) A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10(Suppl 1):29–31Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Andersson DEH, Rojdmark S (1981) Improvement of glucose tolerance by verapamil in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Acta Med Scand 210(1–2):27–33Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chellingsworth MC, Kendall MJ, Wright AD, Singh BM, Pasi J (1989) The effects of verapamil, diltiazem, nifedipine and propranolol on metabolic control in hypertensives with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Hum Hypertens 3(1):35–39Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cortassa G, Borgoglio A, Civelli D et al (1991) Effects of antihypertensive therapy with verapamil on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion in type II diabetics. Curr Ther Rese Clin Exp 49(5):843–853Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fernández R, Puig JG, Rodríguez-Pérez JC, Garrido J, Redon J, TRAVEND Study Group (2001) Effect of two antihypertensive combinations on metabolic control in type-2 diabetic hypertensive patients with albuminuria: a randomised, double-blind study. J Hum Hypertens 15(12):849–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ferrier C, Ferrari P, Weidmann P, Keller U, Beretta-Piccoli C, Riesen WF (1991) Antihypertensive therapy with Ca2+. Antagonist verapamil and/or ACE inhibitor enalapril in NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care 14(10):911–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goicolea I, Fernández González R, Piniés J et al (2002) Effect of antihypertensive combinations on arterial pressure, albuminuria, and glycemic control in patients with type II diabetic nephropathy: a randomized study. Nefrologia 22(2):170–178Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Röjdmark S, Andersson DE, Hed R, Sundblad L (1981) Calcium-antagonistic effects on glucose response to glucagon in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and in normoglycemic subjects. Horm Metab Res 13(12):664–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Röjdmark S, Andersson DE (1984) Influence of verapamil on glucose tolerance. Acta Med Scand Suppl 681:37–42Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rubio-Guerra AF, Arceo-Navarro A, Vargas-Ayala G, Rodriguez-Lopez L, Lozano-Nuevo JJ, Gomez-Harper CT (2004) The effect of trandolapril and its fixed-dose combination with verapamil on proteinuria in normotensive adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27(7):1688–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lyngsøe J, Sørensen M, Sjøstrand H, Sengeløv H, Thrane MT, Holst J (1992) The effect of sustained release verapamil on glucose metabolism in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Drugs 44(Suppl 1):85–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sorensen MB, Sjøstrand H, Sengeløv H, Tiefenthal M, Holst J, Lyngsøe J (1991) Influence of short term verapamil treatment on glucose metabolism in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 41(5):401–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Andersson DE, Röjdmark S, Hed R, Sundblad L (1982) Hypercalcemic and calcium-antagonistic effects on insulin release and oral glucose tolerance in man. Acta Med Scand 211(1–2):35–43Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rojdmark S, Andersson DE (1986) Influence of verapamil on human glucose tolerance. Am J Cardiol 57(7):39d–43dCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pharmacovigilance Service, Unit Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical SciencesUniversity Hospital “Luigi Sacco”- University of Milan ASST Fatebenefratelli-SaccoMilanItaly
  2. 2.International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center, Fondazione Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences L. Sacco“Luigi Sacco” University Hospital, Università di MilanoMilanItaly
  3. 3.Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio MedeaBosisio PariniItaly
  4. 4.Biomedical and Clinical Science L. SaccoUniversità di MilanoMilanItaly
  5. 5.Nephrology DivisionBoston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  6. 6.Division of EndocrinologyASST Fatebenefratelli-SaccoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations