Four years of experience as a major trauma centre results in no improvement in patient selection for whole-body CT scans following blunt trauma
Management of major trauma patients with evidence of polytrauma involves the use of immediate whole-body CT (WBCT). Identification of patients appropriate for immediate WBCT remains challenging. Our study aimed to assess for improvement in patient selection for WBCT over time as a major trauma centre (MTC).
We conducted a retrospective study of patients who presented to our MTC during distinct two-month periods, one in 2013 and the other in 2017. Patients over 18 years of age who presented primarily following blunt trauma and activated a major trauma call were included. All patients underwent either immediate WBCT or standard ATLS workup. Those undergoing WBCT had the results of their scan recorded as positive or negative.
A total of 516 patients were included, 232 from 2 months in 2013 and 284 from 2 months in 2017. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients undergoing WBCT (61.6% vs 59.5%), selective CT (31.9% vs 32.4%) or no CT (6.5% vs 8.1%) between the cohorts. There was no improvement in the rate of negative WBCT observed between 2013 and 2017 (47.6% vs 39.6%, p = 0.17).
There was no improvement in patient selection for WBCT following trauma at our institution over a three-year period. Optimal patient selection presents an ongoing clinical challenge, with 39–47% of patients undergoing a scan demonstrating no injuries.
KeywordsBlunt injury Nonpenetrating injury Trauma centre Whole-body imaging
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
P. Beak, B. Gabbott and M. Williamson declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose. CB Hing reports personal fees from Elsevier, grants from ORUK, grants from Arthrex, grants from Stryker, grants from NIHR, outside the submitted work.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- 1.American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (2012) Advanced trauma life support program for doctors, 9th edn. American College of Surgeons, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 3.Surendran A, Mori A, Varma DK, Gruen RL (2014) Systematic review of the benefits and harms of whole-body computed tomography in the early management of multitrauma patients: are we getting the whole picture? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76:1122–1130. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000178 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ionising radiation: dose comparisons–GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ionising-radiation-dose-comparisons/ionising-radiation-dose-comparisons
- 8.Sierink JC, Treskes K, Edwards MJR et al (2016) Immediate total-body CT scanning versus conventional imaging and selective CT scanning in patients with severe trauma (REACT-2): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388:673–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30932-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Major trauma centre|St George’s Healthcare services. https://www.stgeorges.nhs.uk/service/emergency-department/major-trauma-centre/
- 12.London Ambulance Service–London Major Trauma Decisions Tool (Adults & Children 12-18 years old). http://www.c4ts.qmul.ac.uk/downloads/trauma-triage-london-adult.jpg
- 19.Geyer LL, Körner M, Harrieder A et al (2016) Dose reduction in 64-row whole-body CT in multiple trauma: an optimized CT protocol with iterative image reconstruction on a gemstone-based scintillator. Br J Radiol 89:20160003. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Standards of practice and guidance for trauma radiology in severely injured patients Standards of practice and guidance for trauma radiology in severely injured patients, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar