Economic analyses of fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
- 54 Downloads
The number of total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasties (TKA) grows constantly which causes enormously rising costs for healthcare systems. The aim of this systematic literature review was to evaluate whether a cost reduction can be achieved by THA or TKA fast-track protocols, which is a multidisciplinary approach aiming at faster recovery.
A systematic literature research was undertaken for the timeframe from 2007/01/01 to 2019/03/04 in PubMed. Abstracts and title of the identified records were checked for eligible criteria and afterward the full text was assessed.
Seven studies were included in the review. All studies showed a reduction in the total cost for fast-track THA and TKA. Most studies based their cost calculations on the amount of days the patients spend in the hospital.
Using a fast-track protocol can significantly reduce the overall costs of the treatment.
KeywordsFast-track Total hip arthroplasty Total knee arthroplasty Cost-effectiveness Cost analysis
All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. All authors participated in critically revising the manuscript and all authors’ approved the final version of the manuscript for submission. Anica Mayer and Matthias Büttner performed the literature search. Anica Mayer and Matthias Büttner interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. Anica Mayer and Britta Büchler performed the quality assessment of the studies.
This study did not receive any funding or grants.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animals rights
No research involving human participants and/or animals was carried out.
No informed consent was obtained, due to the nature of the study being a systematic review.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 3.Kauppila A-M, Sintonen H, Aronen P, Ohtonen P, Kyllönen E, Arokoski JPA (2011) Economic evaluation of multidisciplinary rehabilitation after primary total knee arthroplasty based on a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res 63:335–341Google Scholar
- 5.Quack V, Ippendorf AV, Betsch M, Schenker H, Nebelung S, Rath B et al (2015) Multidisziplinäre Rehabilitation und multimodale Fast-Track-Rehabilitation in der Knieendoprothetik: schneller, besser, günstiger? Eine Umfrage und systematische Literaturrecherche. Die Rehabilit 54:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bitton R (2009) The economic burden of osteoarthritis. Am J Manag Care 15:S230–S235Google Scholar
- 11.Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 89:780–785Google Scholar
- 24.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097Google Scholar
- 29.Wilches C, Sulbarána JD, Fernándeza JE, Gisberta JM, Bausili JM, Pelfort X (2017) Fast-track recovery technique applied to primary total hip and knee replacement surgery. Analysis of costs and complications. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 61:111–116Google Scholar
- 31.Köksal İ, Tahta M, Şimşek ME, Doğan M, Bozkurt M (2015) Efficacy of rapid recovery protocol for total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turcica 49:382–386Google Scholar