Correction to: Hemiarthroplasty for neck of femur fractures: to cement or not? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis
- 259 Downloads
Correction to: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology (2019) 29:731–746 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02364-z
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The correct information is given below.
In abstract, the last sentence of the “Primary outcomes” section should read as:
Mortality at 1 year was the same in both the groups.
The second paragraph of the “Mortality” section should read as:
We meta-analysed four studies that reported mortality at 1 year [9, 14, 15, 17]. In cemented group, there were 85 deaths out of 319, and in uncemented group, there were 87 deaths out of 340. Analysis showed both the groups to be equivalent [odds ratio 1.07 (95% CI 0.75−1.52 and p = 0.71)] (Fig. 9). This shows that there is no significant difference in the rates of mortality even if cement is used in hemiarthroplasty, further advocating its usage. So 1-year mortality after all may not be such a big consideration to avoid cemented surgeries and prefer uncemented ones.
The last sentence of the “Re‑operation rate” section should read as:
Our analysis showed both groups to be equivalent [odds ratio 0.85 (95% CI 0.41–1.76)] (Fig. 10).
The seventh paragraph of the “Discussion” section should read as:
In terms of mortality at 1 year, the results were equivocal, showing that use of cement may not be after all a hindrance to survival post-hemiarthroplasties. In terms of other secondary outcomes, there was no difference between the groups.