Advertisement

Risk of ulnar nerve injury during cross-pinning in supine and prone position for supracondylar humeral fractures in children: a recent literature review

  • Nunzio CatenaEmail author
  • Maria Grazia Calevo
  • Dario Fracassetti
  • Desiree Moharamzadeh
  • Carlo Origo
  • Maurizio De Pellegrin
General Review • ELBOW - PAEDIATRIC
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

Aim of this review article is to evaluate the percentage of ulnar nerve lesion during cross-pinning considering the patient’s position (supine or prone) on the surgical bed. Comprehensive research was performed by searching in PUBMED, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS and Clinicaltrials.gov from 2005. Children with extension type supracondylar humeral fractures without clinical signs of ulnar nerve lesion at presentation were included. A total of 28 papers were examined including 2147 patients; 1541 underwent a closed reduction and cross-pinning in supine position and 606 in prone position. Among 1541 patients in supine position, 69 (4.5%) suffered from a ulnar nerve injury while among the 606 patients treated in prone position none ulnar nerve lesions were reported. Despite the apparent safety of prone position, further larger studies, comparing the patient’s position on the surgical bed, need to be carried out in order to confirm this likelihood.

Keywords

Ulnar nerve lesions Pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures Supine and prone position 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    AAOS (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons) (2011) The treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: evidence based guidelines and evidence report. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. http://www.aoos.org/research/guidelines/supracondylarfractures/supconfullguidelines.pdf
  2. 2.
    Anwar R, Rahman N, Iqbal MJ, Khan MA (2011) Comparison of the two methods of percutaneous K-wire fixation in displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children. J Postgrad Med Inst 25:356–361Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barlas K, George B, Hashmi F, Bagga T (2006) Open medial placement of Kirschner wires for supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 14:53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brauer CA, Lee BM, Bae DS, Waters PM, Kocher MS (2007) A systematic review of medial and lateral entry pinning versus lateral entry pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Pediatr Orthop 27:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carter CT, Bertrand SL, Cearley DM (2013) Management of pediatric tipy III supracondylar humerus fractures in the United States: results of a national survey of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. J Pediatr Orthop 33:750–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Las Heras J, Duran D, De Las Cerda J, Romanillos O, Martinez-Miranda J, Rodriguez Merchan EC (2005) Clin Orthop Relat Res 432:57–64Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Pellegrin M, Brivio A, Pescatori E, Tessari L (2008) Frattura sovracondiloidea di omero in età infantile. Osteosintesi percutanea in posizione prona. Giornale Italiano di Ortopedia e Traumatologia 34:199–204Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Pellegrin M, Fracassetti D, Moharamzadeh D, Origo C, Catena N (2018) Advantages and disadvantages of the prone position in the surgical treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. A literature review. Injury 49:S37–S42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Devkota P, Khan JA, Acharya BM, Pradhan NM, Mainali LP, Singh M, Shrestha SK, Rajbhandari AP (2008) J NMA J Nepal Med Assoc 47:66–70Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eidelman M, Hos N, Katzman A, Bialik V (2007) Prevention of ulnar nerve injury during fixation of supracondylar fractures in children by “flexion-extension cross pinning” technique. J Pediatr Orthop B 16:221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fowler TP, Marsh JL (2006) Reduction and pining of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures in the prone position. J Orthop Trauma 20:277–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gartland JJ (1959) Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 109:145–154Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gaston RG, Cates RB, Devito D, Schmitz M, Schrader T, Busch M, Fabregas J, Rosenberg E, Blanco J (2010) Medial and lateral pinning versus lateral entry pin fixation for type 3 supracondylar fractures in children: a prospective surgeon randomized study. J Pediatr Orthop 30:799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Green DW, Widmann RF, Frank JS, Gardner MJ (2005) Low incidence of ulnar nerve injury with crossed pin placement for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using a mini open technique. J Orthop Trauma 19:158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guler O, Mutlu S, Isyar M, Mutlu H, Cerci H, Mahirogullari M (2016) Prone versus supine position during surgery for supracondylar humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 24:167–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Havlass V, Trc T, Gaheer R, Schejbalova A (2008) Manipulation of pediatric supracondylar fractures of the humerus in prone position under general anesthesia. J Pediatr Orthop 28:660–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD et al (2011) Cochrane bias methods G, cochrane statistical methods G. The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holt JB, Glass NA, Shah AS (2018) Understanding the epidemiology of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures in the United States: identifying opportunities for intervention. J Pediatr Orthop 38:e245–e251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hsuan Kai K, Weng EY, Wei Chun L, Chia Hsieh C (2014) Treatment of Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures with the Kapandji technique in the prone position. J Orthop Trauma 28:354–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ibrahim T, Hegazy A, Abulhail SI, Ghomrawi HM (2017) Utility of the AAOS Appropiate Use Criteria (AUC) for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures in clinical practice. J Pediatr Orthop 37:14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalenderer O, Reisoglu A, Surer L, Agus H (2008) How should we treat iatrogenic ulnar injury after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures? Injury 39:463–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karapinar L, Ozturk H, Altay T, Kose B (2005) Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning with three Kirschner wires in children with type III displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 39:22–29Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khan AQ, Goel S, Abbas M, Sherwani MK (2007) Percutaneous K-wiring for Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Saudi Med J 28:603–606Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khan MS, Sultan S, Ali MA, Khan A, Younis M (2005) Comparison of percutaeneous pinning with casting in supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 17:33–36Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kocher MS, Kasser JR, Waters PM, Bae DS, Snyder BD, Hresko MT, Hedequist D, Karlin L, Kim YJ, Murray MM, Millis MB, Emans JB, Dichtel L, Matheney T, Lee BM (2007) Lateral entry compared with lateral and medial entry pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:706–712Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kwak Lee J, Kim R, Ebramzadeh E, Silva M (2014) Is medial pin use safe fro treating pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures? J Orthop Trauma 28:216–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li YA, Lee PC, Chia WT, Lin HJ, Chiu FY, Chen TH, Feng CK (2009) Prospective analysis of a new minimally invasive technique for paediatric Gartland type III supracondylar fractures of the humerus. Injury 40:1302–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahmood S, Ali Z, Makki KH (2013) Stability after close reduction and stabilization by two percutaneous pinning technique in type III supracondylar fracture of humerus. Pak Paediatr J 37:243–248Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maity A, Saha D, Da Roy (2012) A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing medial and lateral entry pinning with lateral entry pinning for percutaneous fixation of displaced extension type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Orthop Surg Res 15:7Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mulpuri K. Management of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus using lateral versus cross K wires: a prospective randomized clinical trial. British Columbia Children’s Hospital Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00358787Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ozcelik A, Tekcan A, Omeroglu H (2006) Correlation between iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury and angular insertion of the medial pin in supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B 16:58–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pandey S, Shrestha D, Gorg M, Singh GK, Singh MP (2008) Treatment of supracondylar fracture of the humerus (type IIB and III) in children: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing two methods. Kathmandu Univ Med J 6:310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Revman 2014 Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3 [Computer program]. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rjal KP, Pandev KP (2006) Supracondylar extension type III fracture of the humerus in children: percutaneous cross-pinning. Kathmandu Univ Med J 4:456–469Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Singh S, Pai DR, Kaur A, Soe HH (2013) Crossed versus lateral pinning in the treatment of displaced extention type supracondylar fractures of the humerus: a prospective study. Internet J Orthop Surg 21:32–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tripuranemi KR, Bosch PP, Schwend RM, Yaste JJ (2009) Prospective surgeon-randomized evaluation of crossed pins versus lateral pins for unstable supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 18:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Venkatadass K, Balachandar G, Rajasekaran S (2015) Is prone position ideal for manipulation and pinning of displaced pediatric extension type supracondylar fractures of the humerus? A randomized control trial. J Pediatr Orthop 35:672–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zalt I, Waters PM, Kasser J (1996) Ulnar nerve instability in children. J Pediatr Orthop 16:567–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pediatric Orthopedic and Traumatology Unit, Children’s HospitalAON SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare ArrigoAlessandriaItaly
  2. 2.Biostatistic and Epidemiology UnitIRCCS Istituto Giannina GasliniGenoaItaly
  3. 3.Pediatric Orthopedic and Traumatology UnitSan Raffaele HospitalMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations