Advertisement

Investigation of the control of rotational alignment in the tibial component during total knee arthroplasty

  • Mitsuru HanadaEmail author
  • Hiroki Furuhashi
  • Yukihiro Matsuyama
Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Background

In this study, rotational errors that occur in relation to the tibial component of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were investigated intraoperatively using a CT-free navigation system and postoperative CT images to confirm the correctness of the rotation.

Methods

Forty patients who underwent TKA using the navigation system were examined. These patients were split evenly into two groups, those whose rotational position was confirmed using a mark made manually on the tibia, and those whose rotation was confirmed using the navigation. All patients underwent postoperative CT scanning and were evaluated using the Knee Society Score.

Results

With navigation, a significant difference was found between the rotational positions for which we made a keel hole and those for which the tibial component was inserted unguided. After cementing, the rotational position in the group for which a manual mark was used to confirm the rotation differed significantly from the position for the group for which navigation during cementing was used. Although there were four outliers that had rotational errors over 3° after cementing in the manual mark group, there were no outliers in the navigation group. While there was significant difference in the rotational errors of the tibial component on postoperative CT between two groups, the Knee Society Score did not differ between two groups.

Conclusion

The exact rotation of a tibial component cannot be maintained by simply creating a keel hole. The use of a manual mark resulted in rotational errors of the tibial component and the creation of the outliers. Therefore, it is suggested that the use of a navigation system can reduce the occurrence of such errors.

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty CT-free navigation Tibial component Rotational error 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No author has received any financial support from any company.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boldt JG, Stiehl JB, Munzinger U, Beverland D, Keblish PA (2006) Femoral component rotation in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Knee 13(4):284–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Merkow RL, Soudry M, Insall JN (1985) Patellar dislocation following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(9):1321–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nicoll D, Rowley DI (2010) Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(9):1238–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hungerford DS, Krackow KA (1985) Total joint arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192:23–33Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:168–172Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stiehl JB, Abbott BD (1995) Morphology of the transepicondylar axis and its application in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10(6):785–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olcott CW, Scott RD (1999) The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:39–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fehring TK (2000) Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE (2001) Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD (1998) The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2004) An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stöckl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O (2004) Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM, Bos J, van der Heide HJ, Nelissen RG (2011) A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop 35(6):845–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuriyama S, Hyakuna K, Inoue S, Tamaki Y, Ito H, Matsuda S (2014) Tibial rotational alignment was significantly improved by use of a CT-navigated control device in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29(12):2352–2356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eckhoff DG, Metzger RG, Vandewalle MV (1995) Malrotation associated with implant alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:28–31Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee DH, Seo JG, Moon YW (2008) Synchronisation of tibial rotational alignment with femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32(2):223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morra EA, Postak PD, Plaxton NA, Greenwald AS (2003) The effects of external torque on polyethylene tibial insert damage patterns. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chowdhury EA, Porter ML (2005) How is the tibial tray aligned to the femoral prosthesis in a total knee arthroplasty? A survey of opinion from BASK? Knee 12(2):79–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ikeuchi M, Yamanaka N, Okanoue Y, Ueta E, Tani T (2007) Determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component at total knee replacement: a comparison of two techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(1):45–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eisenhuth SA, Saleh KJ, Cui Q, Clark CR, Brown TE (2006) Patellofemoral instability after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parratte S, Blanc G, Boussemart T, Ollivier M, Le Corroller T, Argenson JN (2013) Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2213–2219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davis ET, Pagkalos J, Gallie PA, Macgroarty K, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH (2014) Defining the errors in the registration process during imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Arthroplasty 29(4):698–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryHamamatsu University School of MedicineHamamatsuJapan

Personalised recommendations