Mid-term clinical results of the cementless R3 cup and Polarstem total hip arthroplasty
- 96 Downloads
There has been a shift from cemented to uncemented hip arthroplasty. One popular uncemented combination is the R3 acetabular cup with Polarstem, having the lowest revision rate in the UK National Joint Registry. However, there are no medium-term clinical outcomes on this combination in the literature. The aim of this study is to review our centre’s outcomes with this combination using conventional bearings with a minimum of 7-year follow-up.
Using our centre’s arthroplasty database, we identified all patients that underwent a total hip arthroplasty using these implants from August 2009 to December 2010. One hundred and forty-four procedures were performed. The primary outcome was revision rate, and the secondary outcomes were clinical and radiological evaluation.
The mean cohort age at surgery was 68.3 years. There were three revisions, of which only one underwent a cup revision. The mean Oxford Hip Score at 7-year follow-up was 38. Radiological evaluation of both acetabular and stem component did not show any radiolucency at 7-year follow-up. Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis showed an implant survival rate of 97.69% at 7 years using revision for all causes as endpoint. The risk of revision was 1.47% at 7 years.
Our revision rates are comparable to the UK’s National Joint Registry, with excellent clinical and radiological outcome. Our results correlate with the allocated rating of 7A* by the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel for both R3 acetabular cup and Polarstem.
KeywordsTotal hip arthroplasty Total hip replacement R3 cup Polar stem Uncemented Cementless
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 3.National Joint Registry for England and Wales (2017) 14th annual report. http://www.njrreports.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2014th%20Annual%20Report%202017.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
- 7.Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27Google Scholar
- 8.DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32Google Scholar
- 10.Jantzen C, Jørgensen HL, Duus BR, Sporring SL, Lauritzen JB (2013) Chromium and cobalt ion concentrations in blood and serum following various types of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 84(3):229–236. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.792034 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (2017) Annual report 2017. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/397736/Hip%2C%20Knee%20%26%20Shoulder%20Arthroplasty. Accessed 29 June 2018
- 12.Lee PY, Evans AR (2014) Early failure of the Polarstem total hip arthroplasty—can the Australian NJR tell us the full story? J Arthroplast 29:609e11Google Scholar
- 14.Gordon M, Green M, Frumento P, Rolfson O, Garellick G, Stark A (2014) Age- and health-related quality of life after total hip replacement: decreasing gains in patients above 70 years of age. Acta Orthop 85(3):244–249. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.916492 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Buttaro MA, Oñativia JI, Slullitel PA, Andreoli M, Comba F, Zanotti G, Piccaluga F (2017) Metaphyseal debonding of the Corail collarless cementless stem: report of 18 cases and case-control study. Bone Joint J 99-B(11):1435–1441. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b11.bjj-2017-0431.r1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lovelock TM, Broughton NS (2018) Follow-up after arthroplasty of the hip and knee: are we over-servicing or under-caring? Bone Joint J 100-B(1):6–10. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b1.bjj-2017-0779.r1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar