Advertisement

Dupuytren’s disease: limited fasciectomy, night splinting, and hand exercises—long-term results

  • Dimitrios KitridisEmail author
  • Paraskevi Karamitsou
  • Iraklis Giannaros
  • Nikolaos Papadakis
  • Chris Sinopidis
  • Panagiotis Givissis
Original Article • HAND - DUPUYTREN DISEAESE
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Dupuytren’s contracture (DC) is a fibroproliferative disorder of palmar fascia that causes flexion contractures of one or more digits. There is currently no gold standard operative and postoperative protocol for reducing recurrence rates. We propose a combination of surgical intervention, night splinting, and home hand exercises as a treatment protocol.

Methods

Thirty patients were included in our study, diagnosed with DC Tubiana grade II–IV. Our treatment protocol was limited fasciectomy followed by a 24-week night splint application, combined with home hand exercises for eight weeks. The outcomes were recurrence, QuickDASH score, extension or flexion deficit, and grip strength. The mean follow-up was 4.9 years (range 2–11 years).

Results

Recurrence of DC occurred in two patients (7%), who had discontinued the use of the splint within two months postoperatively. All other patients had complied with the postoperative protocol. The mean QuickDASH score improved from 61.5 (SD 2.1) to 8.6 (SD 2) postoperatively (p < 0.001). Grip strength did not differ significantly in the operated hands (37.9 kg, SD 1.3) when compared to the healthy hands (40.2 kg, SD 1.3, p = 0.035). The recurrence was not significantly correlated either with the Tubiana grade (p = 0.7), or with the patients’ age (p = 0.27).

Conclusions

This study shows that limited fasciectomy followed by a 24-week night splint application, combined with home hand exercises for at least eight weeks, is a viable protocol which reduces the rates of recurrence of DC.

Keywords

Dupuytren’s contracture Limited fasciectomy Night splinting Recurrence 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Huisstede BMA, Hoogvliet P, Coert JH, Fridén J (2013) Dupuytren disease: European hand surgeons, hand therapists, and physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians agree on a multidisciplinary treatment guideline: results from the HANDGUIDE study. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:964e–976e.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118655412.ch59 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duthie RB, Francis MJ (1988) Free radicals and Dupuytren’s contracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:689–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ling RS (1963) The genetic factor in Dupuytren’s disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br 45:709–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lanting R, Broekstra DC, Werker PMN, van den Heuvel ER (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of Dupuytren disease in the general population of Western Countries. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:593–603.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000438455.37604.0f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dias J, Bainbridge C, Leclercq C et al (2013) Surgical management of Dupuytren’s contracture in Europe: regional analysis of a surgeon survey and patient chart review. Int J Clin Pract 67:271–281.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kan HJ, Verrijp FW, Hovius SER et al (2017) Recurrence of Dupuytren’ s contracture: a consensus-based definition. PLoS ONE 12:1–10Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Samargandi OA, Alyouha S, Larouche P et al (2017) Night orthosis after surgical correction of dupuytren contractures: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 42:839.e1–839.e10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tubiana R (1986) Evaluation of deformities in Dupuytren’s disease. Ann Chir Main 5:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tonkin MA, Burke FD, Varian JPW (1984) Dupuytren’s contracture: a comparative study of fasciectomy and dermofasciectomy in one hundred patients. J Hand Surg Am 9:156–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(84)80018-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mäkelä EA, Jaroma H, Harju A, Anttila S (1991) Dupuytren’s contracture: the long-term results after day surgery. J Hand Surg Am 16:272–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anwar MU, Al Ghazal SK, Boome RS (2007) Results of surgical treatment of Dupuytren’s disease in women: a review of 109 consecutive patients. J Hand Surg Am 32:1423–1428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abe Y, Rokkaku T, Ofuchi S et al (2004) Surgery for Dupuytren’s disease in Japanese patients and a new preoperative classification. J Hand Surg Br 29:235–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.10.017 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Norotte G, Apoil A, Travers V (1988) A ten years follow-up of the results of surgery for Dupuytren’s disease. A study of fifty-eight cases. Ann Chir Main 7:277–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vollbach FH, Walle L, Fansa H (2013) Dupuytren’s disease - patient satisfaction and functional results one year after partial fasciectomy and injection of collagenase. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 45:258–264.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1351329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Becker GW, Davis TRC (2010) The outcome of surgical treatments for primary Dupuytren’s disease–a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur 35:623–626.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193410376286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Rijssen AL, Gerbrandy FSJ, Ter Linden H et al (2006) A comparison of the direct outcomes of percutaneous needle fasciotomy and limited fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s disease: a 6-week follow-up study. J Hand Surg Am 31:717–725.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.02.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen NC, Srinivasan RC, Shauver MJ, Chung KC (2011) A systematic review of outcomes of fasciotomy, aponeurotomy, and collagenase treatments for Dupuytren’s contracture. Hand 6:250–255.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-011-9326-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bryan AS, Ghorbal MS (1988) The long-term results of closed palmar fasciotomy in the management of Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Surg Br 13:254–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moermans JP (1996) Long-term results after segmental aponeurectomy for Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Br 21:797–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clibbon JJ, Logan AM (2001) Palmar segmental aponeurectomy for Dupuytren’s disease with metacarpophalangeal flexion contracture. J Hand Surg Br 26:360–361.  https://doi.org/10.1054/jhsb.2001.0602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schneider LH (1991) The open palm technique. Hand Clin 7:723–8; discussion 729Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foucher G, Cornil C, Lenoble E (1992) Open palm technique for Dupuytren’s disease. A five-year follow-up. Ann Chir Main Memb Super 11:362–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zoubos AB, Stavropoulos NA, Babis GC et al (2014) The McCash technique for Dupuytren’s disease: our experience. Hand Surg 19:61–67.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218810414500117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thomas PR, Saunders RJ, Means KR (2015) Comparison of digital nerve sensory recovery after repair using loupe or operating microscope magnification. J Hand Surg Eur 40:608–613.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193414556006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Horta R, Burnay T, Silva A (2014) Microsurgical finger revascularization after long warm ischemia time following Dupuytren’s contracture release. Microsurgery 34:415–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chung KC, Segalman KA (1996) Microvascular solution for vascular complication in surgery for Dupuytren’s contracture: a case report. J Hand Surg Am 21:711–713.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80035-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bird B, Ball C, Balasuntharam P (2007) Rehabilitation after surgery for Dupuytren’s contracture (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev Art. No.: CD006508Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Glasgow C, Wilton J, Tooth L (2003) Optimal daily total end range time for contracture: resolution in hand splinting. J Hand Ther 16:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Flowers KR, LaStayo P (1994) Effect of total end range time on improving passive range of motion. J Hand Ther 7:150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Glasgow C, Fleming J, Tooth LR, Hockey RL (2012) The long-term relationship between duration of treatment and contracture resolution using dynamic orthotic devices for the stiff proximal interphalangeal joint: a prospective cohort study. J Hand Ther 25:38–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2011.09.006 quiz 47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shin TM, Bordeaux JS (2012) The role of massage in scar management: a literature review. Dermatol Surg 38:414–423.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02201.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Herweijer H, Dijkstra PU, Nicolai JPA, van der Sluis CK (2007) Postoperative hand therapy in Dupuytren’s disease. Disabil Rehabil 29:1736–1741.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280601125106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kasch MC (1988) Clinical management of scar tissue. Occup Ther Heal Care 4:37–52.  https://doi.org/10.1080/J003v04n03_05 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Patino O, Novick C, Merlo A, Benaim F (1999) Massage in hypertrophic scars. J Burn Care Rehabil 20:268–271 Discussion 267 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsMedical School of Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessaloníkiGreece
  2. 2.Medical School of Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessaloníkiGreece

Personalised recommendations