Type 2 retear after arthroscopic single-row, double-row and suture bridge rotator cuff repair: a systematic review

  • Yehia H. BedeirEmail author
  • Adam P. Schumaier
  • Ghada Abu-Sheasha
  • Brian M. Grawe



To provide a systematic review of the literature on patterns of retear after single-row (SR), double-row (DR) and suture bridge (SB) techniques.


The PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched for published articles reporting both repair technique and retear pattern. Studies in languages other than English, those reporting open rotator cuff repair as the index procedure, as well as animal and cadaveric studies and those which did not describe patterns of retear, were excluded. MINORS scoring system was used to quantify potential bias in each study. Retears were classified into type 1 (failure at the tendon–bone interface) and type 2 (medial cuff failure). For all studies included, number and type of retears after different repair techniques were reported and analyzed.


Fourteen studies were included yielding a total of 260 rotator cuff retears. Repair technique had a significant impact on the estimated incidence rate of type 2 retear (p = .001). The estimated incidence rate of type 2 retear was 24% with SR (95% CI 14–38%), 43% with DR (95% CI 22–66%), 62% with SB (95% CI 54–70%) and 38% with SB (95% CI 23–57%).


Despite the lack of high-quality evidence, this study suggests that DR and SB techniques increase the risk of medial cuff failure. Modifications in surgical techniques in both DR and SB repairs can help decrease that risk.

Level of evidence

Level IV, systematic review of investigations including level IV.


Recurrent cuff tears Retear patterns Medial cuff failure Type 2 retears Revision rotator cuff repair 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

590_2018_2306_MOESM1_ESM.tiff (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 1131 kb)


  1. 1.
    Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T et al (2010) Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(1):116–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Voigt C, Bosse C, Vosshenrich R, Schulz AP, Lill H (2010) Arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair with suture-bridging technique. Am J Sports Med 38(5):983–991. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park J-Y, Lhee S-H, Oh K-S, Moon SG, Hwang J-T (2013) Clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repair for massive rotator cuff tear. Arthroscopy 29(2):280–289. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang J, Robbins M, Reilly J, Maerz T, Anderson K (2017) The clinical effect of a rotator cuff retear: a meta-analysis of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repairs. Am J Sports Med 45(3):733–741. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33(12):1861–1868. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim DH, ElAttrache NS, Tibone JE et al (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34(3):407–414. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baums MH, Spahn G, Buchhorn GH, Schultz W, Hofmann L, Klinger H-M (2012) Biomechanical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of a single- and double-row rotator cuff repair in an in vivo sheep model. Arthroscopy 28(6):769–777. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burkhart SS, Adams CR, Burkhart SS, Schoolfield JD (2009) A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques of footprint reconstruction for rotator cuff repair: the SwiveLock-FiberChain construct versus standard double-row repair. Arthroscopy 25(3):274–281. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(2):403. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park MC, ElAttrache NS, Tibone JE, Ahmad CS, Jun B-J, Lee TQ (2007) Part I: footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(4):461–468. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park MC, Tibone JE, ElAttrache NS, Ahmad CS, Jun B-J, Lee TQ (2007) Part II: biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(4):469–476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Christoforetti JJ, Krupp RJ, Singleton SB, Kissenberth MJ, Cook C, Hawkins RJ (2012) Arthroscopic suture bridge transosseus equivalent fixation of rotator cuff tendon preserves intratendinous blood flow at the time of initial fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(4):523–530. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cho NS, Lee BG, Rhee YG (2011) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained. Am J Sports Med 39(10):2108–2116. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hein J, Reilly JM, Chae J, Maerz T, Anderson K (2015) Retear rates after arthroscopic single-row, double-row, and suture bridge rotator cuff repair at a minimum of 1 year of imaging follow-up: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31(11):2274–2281. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayashida K, Tanaka M, Koizumi K, Kakiuchi M (2012) Characteristic retear patterns assessed by magnetic resonance imaging after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 28(4):458–464. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG (2010) Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 38(4):664–671. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee KW, Seo DW, Bae KW, Choy WS (2013) Clinical and radiological evaluation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture bridge technique. Clin Orthop Surg 5(4):306. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim KC, Shin HD, Cha SM, Park JY (2014) Comparisons of retear patterns for 3 arthroscopic rotator cuff repair methods. Am J Sports Med 42(3):558–565. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schwarzer G (2007) meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R News. 7(3):40–45Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Higgins J, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane CollaborationGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gerhardt C, Hug K, Pauly S, Marnitz T, Scheibel M (2012) Arthroscopic single-row modified mason-allen repair versus double-row suture bridge reconstruction for supraspinatus tendon tears. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2777–2785. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neyton L, Godenèche A, Nové-Josserand L, Carrillon Y, Cléchet J, Hardy MB (2013) Arthroscopic suture-bridge repair for small to medium size supraspinatus tear: healing rate and retear pattern. Arthroscopy 29(1):10–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tanaka M, Hayashida K, Kobayashi A, Kakiuchi M (2015) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with absorbable sutures in the medial-row anchors. Arthroscopy 31(11):2099–2105. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K, Lo IKY (2008) Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 24(6):727–731. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Virk MS, Bruce B, Hussey KE et al (2017) Biomechanical performance of medial row suture placement relative to the musculotendinous junction in transosseous equivalent suture bridge double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 33(2):242–250. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kullar RS, Reagan JM, Kolz CW, Burks RT, Henninger HB (2015) Suture placement near the musculotendinous junction in the supraspinatus: implications for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 43(1):57–62. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yamakado K, Katsuo S, Mizuno K, Arakawa H, Hayashi S (2010) Medial-row failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 26(3):430–435. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rhee YG, Cho NS, Parke CS (2012) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using modified mason-allen medial row stitch. Am J Sports Med 40(11):2440–2447. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hug K, Gerhardt C, Haneveld H, Scheibel M (2015) Arthroscopic knotless-anchor rotator cuff repair: a clinical and radiological evaluation. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthosc. 23(9):2628–2634. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stahnke K, Nikulka C, Diederichs G, Haneveld H, Scheibel M, Gerhardt C (2016) Serial MRI evaluation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in double-row technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(5):665–672. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Medicine DivisionUniversity of Cincinnati Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, El-Hadara University HospitalUniversity of Alexandria Medical CenterAlexandriaEgypt
  3. 3.Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Statistics, Medical Research InstituteUniversity of AlexandriaAlexandriaEgypt

Personalised recommendations