Advertisement

Arthroscopic extra-articular suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with knotless suture anchor

  • Pinkawas KongmalaiEmail author
Technical Note • SHOULDER - ARTHROSCOPY
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon is a frequently performed procedure during shoulder arthroscopy. Various open and arthroscopic techniques have been described with comparable outcomes and complication rates. We describe a simple, knotless, arthroscopic extra-articular biceps tenodesis technique using a 4.5-mm knotless anchor. This technique avoids the complications associated with open tenodesis surgery while still removing the diseased biceps tendon from the bicipital groove. The benefits from knotless suture anchor include no requirement of arthroscopic knot tying and no risk of the knot irritation under the coracoid and coracoacromial ligament.

Keywords

Biceps tenodesis Suprapectoral biceps tenodesis Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis Tension free biceps tenodesis Hidden biceps lesion Knotless suture anchor 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Kongmalai has nothing to disclose.

Supplementary material

Video 1

Demonstrate arthroscopic extra-articular suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with knotless suture anchor. The patient was in the beach chair position and the right shoulder was operated (MP4 209574 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hsu AR, Ghodadra NS, Provencher MT, Lewis PB, Bach BR (2011) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(2):326–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.019 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pander P, Sierevelt IN, Pecasse G, van Noort A (2018) Irreparable rotator cuff tears: long-term follow-up, five to ten years, of arthroscopic debridement and tenotomy of the long head of the biceps. Int Orthop.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3991-y Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gurnani N, van Deurzen DF, Janmaat VT, van den Bekerom MP (2016) Tenotomy or tenodesis for pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(12):3765–3771.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3640-6 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vellios EE, Nazemi AK, Yeranosian MG, Cohen JR, Wang JC, McAllister DR, Petrigliano FA (2015) Demographic trends in arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis across the United States. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24(10):e279–e285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.021 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shih CA, Chiang FL, Hong CK, Lin CW, Wang PH, Jou IM, Su WR (2017) Arthroscopic transtendinous biceps tenodesis with all-suture anchor. Arthrosc Tech 6(3):e705–e709.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2017.01.018 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Werner BC, Evans CL, Holzgrefe RE, Tuman JM, Hart JM, Carson EW, Diduch DR, Miller MD, Brockmeier SF (2014) Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of minimum 2-year clinical outcomes. Am J Sports Med 42(11):2583–2590.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514547226 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Said HG, Babaqi AA, Mohamadean A, Khater AH, Sobhy MH (2014) Modified subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Int Orthop 38(5):1063–1066.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2272-z Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hong C-K, Hsu K-L, Kuan F-C, Lin C-L, Yeh M-L, Su W-R (2018) Biomechanical evaluation of a transtendinous all-suture anchor technique versus interference screw technique for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis in a cadaveric model. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.007 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Castagna A, Conti M, Mouhsine E, Bungaro P, Garofalo R (2006) Arthroscopic biceps tendon tenodesis: the anchorage technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(6):581–585.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-005-0026-1 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sethi PM, Rajaram A, Beitzel K, Hackett TR, Chowaniec DM, Mazzocca AD (2013) Biomechanical performance of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of interference screw fixation, cortical button fixation, and interference screw diameter. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(4):451–457.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.016 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gigi R, Dolkart O, Sharfman ZT, Goldstein Y, Brosh T, Rath E, Maman E, Chechik O (2017) Biomechanical evaluation of two arthroscopic techniques for biceps tenodesis: triple loop suture versus simple suture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26(1):165–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.019 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carofino BC, Brogan DM, Kircher MF, Elhassan BT, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2013) Iatrogenic nerve injuries during shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(18):1667–1674.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00238 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nho SJ, Reiff SN, Verma NN, Slabaugh MA, Mazzocca AD, Romeo AA (2010) Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(5):764–768.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.01.024 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sears BW, Spencer EE, Getz CL (2011) Humeral fracture following subpectoral biceps tenodesis in 2 active, healthy patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(6):e7–e11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.02.020 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rhee PC, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2013) Iatrogenic brachial plexus injuries associated with open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a report of 4 cases. Am J Sports Med 41(9):2048–2053.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513495646 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moon SC, Cho NS, Rhee YG (2015) Analysis of “hidden lesions” of the extra-articular biceps after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: the subpectoral portion as the optimal tenodesis site. Am J Sports Med 43(1):63–68.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514554193 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sanders B, Lavery KP, Pennington S, Warner JJP (2012) Clinical success of biceps tenodesis with and without release of the transverse humeral ligament. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(1):66–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.037 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jarrett CD, McClelland WB Jr, Xerogeanes JW (2011) Minimally invasive proximal biceps tenodesis: an anatomical study for optimal placement and safe surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(3):477–480.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.002 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Patzer T, Kircher J, Krauspe R (2012) All-arthroscopic suprapectoral long head of biceps tendon tenodesis with interference screw-like tendon fixation after modified lasso-loop stitch tendon securing. Arthrosc Tech 1(1):e53–e56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2012.01.003 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koch BS, Burks RT (2012) Failure of biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 28(5):735–740.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.019 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Song HS, Williams GR Jr (2012) All-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis by knotless winding suture. Arthrosc Tech 1(1):e43–e46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2012.01.002 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaback LA, Gowda AL, Paller D, Green A, Blaine T (2015) Long head biceps tenodesis with a knotless cinch suture anchor: a biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy 31(5):831–835.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.043 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shon MS, Koh KH, Lim TK, Lee SW, Park YE, Yoo JC (2013) Arthroscopic suture anchor tenodesis: loop-suture technique. Arthrosc Tech 2(2):e105–e110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2012.12.003 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tan H, Wang D, Lebaschi AH, Hutchinson ID, Ying L, Deng XH, Rodeo SA, Warren RF (2018) Comparison of bone tunnel and cortical surface tendon-to-bone healing in a rabbit model of biceps tenodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100(6):479–486.  https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.00797 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hohmann E (2018) Editorial commentary: Shoulder subpectoral biceps tenodesis significantly increases the humeral fracture risk—Is this a reason to look for alternatives? Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 34(3):814–815.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.012 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of MedicineSrinakarinwirot UniversityOngkharakThailand

Personalised recommendations