Tourniquet use in lower limb fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 84 Downloads
Tourniquets are commonly used in today’s orthopaedic surgical practice, but little evidence is available regarding the links between the use of a tourniquet and the amount of post-operative pain and other complications. The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing tourniquet versus non-tourniquet use during fracture surgery of the lower limb in adult patients.
A search was performed using the keyword “tourniquet” in EmBase and as a MeSH term in PubMed, and no limitations (including language) were applied. Available studies were screened using the Covidence software, and demographic as well as outcome data were extracted from the final studies. Critical appraisal was performed according to Cochrane Risk of Bias guidelines. Pooled data were assessed for heterogeneity using Chi-squared and I2 tests.
Five studies were included, and no statistically significant difference was found in the amount of pain and post-operative complications between tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups. Length of in-hospital stay was longer in the tourniquet groups. An overall high risk of bias was found in the included studies.
Although the validity and statistical strength of our results are not strong enough to suggest a change in practice in tourniquet use, the operating surgeon should still carefully consider his or her decision to use a tourniquet in lower limb fracture surgery, as there are indeed complications associated with it and no current evidence to support its continued use.
Level of evidence
Level I, systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
KeywordsTourniquet Fracture Lower limb Complication Pain
The authors thank the library search technicians at the library at Odense Universitetshospital for their assistance in gathering material.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that no financial or personal relationships with other people or organisations exist that could inappropriately influence the work in this study.
- 3.Palmer SH, Graham G (1994) Tourniquet-induced rhabdomyolysis after total knee replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 6:416–417Google Scholar
- 7.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Deveraux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Konrad G, Markmiller M, Lenich A, Mayr E, Ruter A (2005) Tourniquets may increase postoperative swelling and pain after internal fixation of ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433:189–194. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000151849.37260.0a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Stauffer ME, Taylor SD, Watson DJ, Peloso PM, Morrison A (2011) Definition of nonresponse to analgesic treatment of arthritic pain: an analytical literature review of the smallest detectable difference, the minimal detectable change, and the minimal clinically important difference on the pain visual analog scale. Int J Inflam. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/231926 Google Scholar