Advertisement

The impacts of internal versus external fixation for tibial fractures with simultaneous acute compartment syndrome

  • Hossein Akbari Aghdam
  • Erfan Sheikhbahaei
  • Hamidreza Hajihashemi
  • Davoud Kazemi
  • Ali AndalibEmail author
Original Article • LOWER LIMB - FRACTURES
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

High-energy tibial fractures may cause compartment syndrome, which needs fasciotomy. However, in this procedure, close fractures become an open wound and choosing the best type of fixation for this situation has been a problem. We assumed early open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) instead of late internal fixation or external fixation, or stage-based approach is a better method.

Methods

We collected fifty-seven medical records from 2012 to 2017 stored in Alzahra and Kashani University Hospital databases. We selected important information of their medical files, called the submitted phone numbers, and asked them to come to our clinic and examined their leg for any malunion and/or movement restriction postoperatively. We asked about pain and paresthesia in their leg. Twelve cases were excluded.

Results

Demographic variables were not significantly different between these two groups. Deep infection, malunion, decreased range of motion in both knee and ankle joints, pain and paresthesia mainly occurred in external fixation group, except malunion (p value = 0.032), other variables were not statistically significant between two groups. More surgeries were performed predominantly for external fixation group (p value < 0.001). External fixation stayed 4.7 days longer at hospital although it was not statistically significant (p value = 0.108).

Conclusion

It is better to perform fasciotomy and ORIF simultaneously in one surgery to lower the number of surgeries, days of hospitalization, decrease the risk of deep infection, malunion and movement restriction although its postoperative outcomes were not considerably different from external fixation. We indicate that stage-based approach is accompanied by poor outcomes and lesser satisfaction.

Keywords

Compartment syndrome Tibial fractures Fracture fixation Internal fracture fixation Postoperative complications Fasciotomy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Dr. Mohammad Ali Tahririan, Mr. Amir Salar Moazen Safaei and Dr. Mohammad Marasi for their kind support throughout this research and proofreading the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

This study started after receiving its ethical approval from Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, department of medical ethics in research with registered inquiry of IR.MUI.REC.1395.1.066.

References

  1. 1.
    Reverte MM, Dimitriou R, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2011) What is the effect of compartment syndrome and fasciotomies on fracture healing in tibial fractures? Injury 42(12):1402–1407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haller JM, Holt D, Rothberg DL, Kubiak EN, Higgins TF (2016) Does early versus delayed spanning external fixation impact complication rates for high-energy tibial plateau and plafond fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(6):1436–1444.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4583-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crist BD, Della Rocca GJ, Stannard JP (2010) Compartment syndrome surgical management techniques associated with tibial plateau fractures. J Knee Surg 23(1):3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goyal S, Naik MA, Tripathy SK, Rao SK (2017) Functional outcome of tibial fracture with acute compartment syndrome and correlation to deep posterior compartment pressure. World J Orthop 8(5):385.  https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i5.385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beebe MJ, Auston DA, Quade JH, Serrano-Riera R, Shah AR, Watson DT et al (2017) OTA/AO classification is highly predictive of acute compartment syndrome after tibia fracture. J Orthop Trauma 31(11):600–605.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Metcalfe D, Hickson CJ, McKee L, Griffin XL (2015) External versus internal fixation for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Traumatol 16(4):275–285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-015-0372-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin S, Mauffrey C, Hammerberg EM, Stahel PF, Hak DJ (2014) Surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(5):797–803.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1252-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao X, Ma J, Ma X, Jiang X, Wang Y, Li F, Lu B (2017) A meta-analysis of external fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. Int J Surg 39:65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zura RD, Adams SB, Jeray KJ, Obremskey WT, Stinnett SS, Olson SA (2010) Timing of definitive fixation of severe tibial plateau fractures with compartment syndrome does not have an effect on the rate of infection. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 69(6):1523–1526.  https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d40403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim TH, Chung JY, Kim KS, Song HK (2017) Is external fixation needed for the treatment of tibial fractures with acute compartment syndrome? Injury.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.018 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morris BJ, Unger RZ, Archer KR, Mathis SL, Perdue AM, Obremskey WT (2013) Risk factors of infection after ORIF of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 27(9):e196–e200.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318284704e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Momaya AM, Hlavacek J, Etier B, Johannesmeyer D, Oladeji LO, Niemeier TE et al (2016) Risk factors for infection after operative fixation of Tibial plateau fractures. Injury 47(7):1501–1505.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gamulin A, Lübbeke A, Belinga P, Hoffmeyer P, Perneger TV, Zingg M, Cunningham G (2017) Clinical and radiographic predictors of acute compartment syndrome in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):307.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1680-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shao J, Chang H, Zhu Y, Chen W, Zheng Z, Zhang H, Zhang Y (2017) Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 41:176–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blair JA, Stoops TK, Doarn MC, Kemper D, Erdogan M, Griffing R, Sagi HC (2016) Infection and nonunion after fasciotomy for compartment syndrome associated with tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma 30(7):392–396.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hak DJ, Lee M, Gotham DR (2010) Influence of prior fasciotomy on infection after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 69(4):886–888.  https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b83fe9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hossein Akbari Aghdam
    • 1
  • Erfan Sheikhbahaei
    • 2
  • Hamidreza Hajihashemi
    • 2
  • Davoud Kazemi
    • 2
  • Ali Andalib
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Orthopaedic Surgery Department, School of Medicine, Kashani University HospitalIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Students Research Committee, School of MedicineIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations