A case series of patients change in mobility following a hip fracture

  • Toby JennisonEmail author
  • Rathan Yarlagadda
Original Article • HIP - TRAUMA



Hip fractures are common in the elderly population. It is currently believed that patients can expect to lose a level of mobility following a hip fracture. The aim of this study was to compare the pre- and post-treatment mobility of patients treated in our institution who had suffered a fracture neck of femur and identify the factors that could predict pre-operatively those patients who would suffer a deterioration in mobility after treatment.


Patients admitted to a large UK teaching hospital with a surgically treated neck of femur fracture were included between 2 April 2011 and 31 March 2014. Patient’s mobility was assessed on admission and at 1 year following surgery.


There were a total of 615 patients alive at 1 year. There were 142 males and 473 females with a mean age of 82.1 (range 47–100). On admission, 338 (55.0%) mobilised independently 52.2% had no change in their pre-fracture mobility at 1 year following their treatment. Age, a lower AMTS, a higher ASA and living in residential care were significant risk factors for not regaining their pre-fracture mobility. Sex and type of fracture were not associated with change in mobility.


It is commonly stated that patients lose one level of mobility following a hip fracture. This case series demonstrates that over 50% of patients can expect to have the same level of mobility at 1 year post-surgery as they did previously.


Hip fracture Mobility Hemiarthroplasty Dynamic hip screw 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Toby Jennison and Rathan Yarlagadda declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2011) The management of hip fracture in adults. Clinical guideline (CG124). London NICE. 2011:
  2. 2.
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2012) Hip fracture quality standard (QS16). London NICE. 2012:
  3. 3.
    Magaziner J, Fredman L, Hawkes W, Hebel JR, Zimmerman S, Orwig DL, Wehren L (2003) Changes in functional status attributable to hip fracture: a comparison of hip fracture patients to community-dwelling aged. Am J Epidemiol 157(11):1023–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vochteloo AJH, Moerman S, Tuinebreijer WE, Maier AB, de Vries MR, Bloem RM, Nelissen RG, Pilot P (2013) More than half of hip fracture patients do not regain mobility in the first postoperative year. Geriatr Gerontol Int 13(2):334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosell PA, Parker MJ (2003) Functional outcome after hip fracture. A 1-year prospective outcome study of 275 patients. Injury 34(7):529–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chirodian N, Arch B, Injury Parker MJ (2005) Sliding hip screw fixation of trochanteric hip fractures: outcome of 1024 procedures. Injury 36(6):793–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mariconda M, Costa GG, Cerbasi S, Recano P, Orabona G, Gambacorta M, Misasi M (2016) Factors predicting mobility and the change in activities of daily living after hip fracture: a 1-year prospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 30(2):71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fukui N, Watanabe Y, Nakano T, Sawaguchi T (2012) Predictors for ambulatory ability and the change in ADL after hip fracture in patients with different levels of mobility before injury: a 1-year prospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 26(3):163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kristensen MT, Foss NB, Ekdahl C, Kehlet H (2010) Prefracture functional level evaluated by the new mobility score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthop 81(3):296–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kristensen MT (2011) Factors affecting functional prognosis of patients with hip fracture. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 47(2):257–264Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kristensen MT, Kehlet H (2012) Most patients regain prefracture basic mobility after hip fracture surgery in a fast-track programme. Dan Med J 59(6):A4447Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsuboi M, Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S, Wingstrand H, Thorngren KG (2007) Mortality and mobility after hip fracture in Japan: a ten-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89(4):461–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haentjens P, Autier P, Barette M, Boonen S (2005) Predictors of functional outcome following intracapsular hip fracture in elderly women. A one-year prospective cohort study. Injury 36(7):842–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haentjens P, Autier P, Barette M, Venken K, Vanderschueren D, Boonen S, Hip Fracture Study Group (2007) Survival and functional outcome according to hip fracture type: a one-year prospective cohort study in elderly women with an intertrochanteric or femoral neck fracture. Bone 41(6):958–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beaupre LA, Cinats JG, Jones CA, Scharfenberger AV, William C, Johnston D, Senthilselvan A, Saunders LD (2007) Does functional recovery in elderly hip fracture patients differ between patients admitted from long-term care and the community? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62(10):1127–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dharmarajan TS, Tankala H, Patel B, Sipalay M, Norkus EP (2001) Outcome in ambulatory status immediately following hip fracture surgery in the acute setting: a comparison of nursing home residents and community older adults. Med Dir Assoc 2(3):115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parker MJ, Palmer CR (1993) A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 75:797–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Foss NB, Kristensen MT, Kehlet H (2006) Prediction of postoperative morbidity, mortality and rehabilitation in hip fracture patients: the cumulated ambulation score. Clin Rehabil 20(8):701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plymouth Hospitals NHS TrustPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations