Advertisement

Impact of patient position on coronal Cobb angle measurement in non-ambulatory myelodysplastic patients

  • Norman RamirezEmail author
  • Jorge Padilla
  • Sigfredo Villarin
  • Francisco Irizarry
  • Ivan Iriarte
  • Jeffrey Sawyer
Original Article • SPINE - IMAGING
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of patient position on the magnitude of the coronal Cobb angle measurements in relation to the change of position using plain radiograph on non-ambulatory children with myelodysplasia.

Summary of background data

Whole-spine radiographs with the patient sitting generally are preferred for the diagnosis and monitoring of progression of scoliosis in neuromuscular patients. Supine, supine traction, and sitting push-up positions have been used as substitutes, although there is no general consensus validating if these positions correlate with the sitting position. The magnitude of the Cobb angles in neuromuscular scoliosis may vary greatly depending on the position of the patient.

Methods

Radiographs of 39 myelodysplastic, non-ambulatory children were evaluated to assess the impact of change in positions (unsupported sitting, sitting push-up, supine, and supine traction) on coronal Cobb angle measurement using plain whole-spine radiographs.

Results

The mean difference in thoracic Cobb angle measurements between sitting and all other positions ranged from 6° to 12°. At the lumbar level, the Cobb angles ranged from 12° to 16°.

Conclusions

Statistically significant differences in the Cobb angle measurements were identified between plain radiographs of the whole spine with the patient in the unsupported sitting position compared to sitting push-up, supine, and supine traction positions. The data support that the magnitude of the Cobb angles in neuromuscular scoliosis varies greatly depending on the position of the patient.

Level of evidence

III.

Keywords

Neuromuscular scoliosis Coronal Cobb angle Myelodysplasia Spine radiograph 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Children’s Spine Foundation for the grant awarded to perform the study. We also give recognition to John M Flynn MD (deceased) who gave the initial support.

Funding

Funding was provided by Children Spine Foundation Grant #18.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Halawi M, Lark R, Fitch R (2015) Neuromuscular scoliosis: current concepts. Orthopedics 38:e452–e456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. In: Edwards JW (ed) Instructional course lectures. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeon, Ann Arbor, pp 261–275Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta M, Wijesekera S, Sossan A et al (2007) Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 32:691–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brink RC, Colo D, Schlösser TPC et al (2017) Upright, prone, and supine spinal morphology and alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12:6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keenan BE, Izatt MT, Askin GN et al (2014) Supine to standing Cobb angle change in idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of endplate pre-selection. Scoliosis 9:16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vavruch L, Tropp H (2016) A comparison of Cobb angle: standing versus supine images of late-onset idiopathic scoliosis. Polish J Radiol 81:270–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Torell G, Nachemson A, Haderspeck-Grib K et al (1985) Standing and supine Cobb measures in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 10:425–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee MC, Solomito M, Patel A (2013) Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs. Spine 38:E656–E661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wessberg P, Danielson BI, Willen J (2006) Comparison of Cobb angles in idiopathic scoliosis on standing radiographs and supine axially loaded MRI. Spine 31:3039–3044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trivedi J, Thomson JD, Slakey JB et al (2002) Clinical and radiographic predictors of scoliosis in patients with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(8):1389–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Canfield MA, Mai CT, Wang P, O’Halloran A, Marengo LK, Olney RS et al (2014) The association between race/ethnicity and major birth defects in the United States, 1999–2007. Am J Public Health 104:e1–e10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pediatric Orthopedic SurgeonHospital De La Concepcion - San German, Puerto RicoMayaguezUSA
  2. 2.Ponce Health Sciences UniversityPonceUSA
  3. 3.University of Tennessee-Campbell ClinicMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations