Reduction techniques for difficult subtrochanteric fractures
- 204 Downloads
Subtrochanteric fractures can result from high-energy trauma in young patients or from a fall or minor trauma in the elderly. Intramedullary nails are currently the most commonly used implants for the stabilization of these fractures. However, the anesthetic procedure for the patients, the surgical reduction and osteosynthesis for the fractures are challenging. The anesthetic management of orthopedic trauma patients should be based upon various parameters that must be evaluated before the implementation of any anesthetic technique. Surgery- and patient-related characteristics and possible comorbidities must be considered during the pre-anesthetic evaluation. Adequate fracture reduction and proper nail entry point are critical. Understanding of the deforming forces acting on various fracture patterns and knowledge of surgical reduction techniques are essential in obtaining successful outcomes. This article discusses the intraoperative reduction techniques for subtrochanteric fractures in adults and summarizes tips and tricks that the readers may find useful and educative.
KeywordsHip fractures Subtrochanteric Reduction techniques Anesthesia
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Saudan M, Lubbeke A, Sadowski C, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P (2002) Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma 16(6):386–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Haidukewych GJ (2009) Intertrochanteric fractures: ten tips to improve results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(3):712–719Google Scholar
- 15.Russel TA (2006) Subtrochanteric femur fractures: reconstruction nailing. In: Hurley R, LePlante M (eds) Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery: fractures, 2nd edn. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 291–322Google Scholar
- 18.Farrar MJ, Binns MS (1996) Percutaneous reduction for closed nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J R Coll Surg Edinb 41(4):267–268Google Scholar
- 20.Moeller TB, Reif E (2007) Lower extremity. In: Verlagsgruppe (ed) Pocket atlas of sectional anatomy: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, pp 116–140Google Scholar
- 32.Kacha NJ, Jadeja CA, Patel PJ, Chaudhari HB, Jivani JR, Pithadia VS (2018) Comparative study for evaluating efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block for alleviating pain of positioning for spinal anesthesia in patients with hip and proximal femur fractures. Indian J Orthop 52(2):147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Morin AM, Kratz CD, Eberhart LH, Dinges G, Heider E, Schwarz N, Eisenhardt G, Geldner G, Wulf H (2005) Postoperative analgesia and functional recovery after total-knee replacement: comparison of a continuous posterior lumbar plexus (psoas compartment) block, a continuous femoral nerve block, and the combination of a continuous femoral and sciatic nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 30(5):434–445Google Scholar
- 36.Mavrogenis AF, Panagopoulos GN, Megaloikonomos PD, Igoumenou VG, Galanopoulos I, Vottis CT, Karabinas P, Koulouvaris P, Kontogeorgakos VA, Vlamis J, Papagelopoulos PJ (2016) Complications after hip nailing for fractures. Orthopedics 39(1):e108–e116. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20151222-11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar