Acquired spondylolysis and spinopelvic sagittal alignment
- 126 Downloads
Acquired spondylolysis represents an uncommon complication of spine surgery, of an unknown incidence and etiology. We studied patients presenting this rare entity, with the purpose to investigate the incidence, imaging findings, patients’ clinical characteristics, as well as to provide an interpretation of the mechanisms that may lead to this phenomenon. The presented working hypothesis, regarding etiology, suggests that there is a relation between variations in spinopelvic sagittal alignment and acquired spondylolysis. Between January 2010 and January 2015, six patients presented spondylolysis after short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, at a mean time of 43 months after surgery. The preoperative intactness and postoperative defect of pars interarticularis were documented with computed tomography scans in all patients. Standard radiographical spinopelvic parameters were measured before and after surgery. The optimum values of lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis modifier (PI-LL mismatch) were calculated as well. The incidence of acquired spondylolysis was 0.95% among patients with short-segment lumbar fusion. Patients presented high-grade PI with a vertically orientated sacral endplate, while LL was found 9° greater and PI-LL mismatch 9° lower than the respective optimum values, indicating a non-harmonized alignment. In conclusion, acquired spondylolysis, though rare, may occur in patients with high-grade PI and sacral slope, and suboptimal spinopelvic sagittal alignment after lumbar spine surgery, thereby highlighting the importance of detailed preoperative planning in spine surgery, along with the study of sagittal balance.
KeywordsIatrogenic Acquired Spondylolysis Spinopelvic parameters Malalignment
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. No benefits have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject matter of this article.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 10.Soultanis KC, Mavrogenis AF, Starantzis KA, Markopoulos C, Stavropoulos NA, Mimidis G, Kokkalis ZT, Papagelopoulos PJ (2014) When and how to operate on thoracic and lumbar spine fractures? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(4):443–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1341-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Labelle H, Weidenbaum M (2006) Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in the presence of L5-s1 isthmic lysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(21):2484–2490. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000239155.37261.69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Ames CP, Kebaish K, Hart RA, Farcy JP, Lafage V, International Spine Study G (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(13):E803–E812. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318292b7b9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D, DeWald C, Mehdian H, Shaffrey C, Tribus C, Lafage V (2012) Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(12):1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31823e15e2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar