Advertisement

Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with disc degeneration

  • Adam Biczo
  • Julia Szita
  • Iain McCall
  • Peter Pal Varga
  • the Genodisc Consortium
  • Aron LazaryEmail author
Original Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Numerous candidate genes and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified in the background of lumbar disc degeneration (LDD). However, in most of these underpowered studies, definitions of LDD are inconsistent; moreover, many of the findings have not been replicated and are contradictory. Our aim was to characterize LDD by well-defined phenotypes and possible endophenotypes and analyse the association between these and candidate vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms on a large (N = 1426) dataset.

Methods

Seven candidate VDR SNPs were genotyped. Individual association, haplotype and gene–gene interaction analyses were performed. All degenerative endophenotypes were significantly associated with one or more candidate VDR gene variants.

Results

Haplotype analyses confirmed the association between the 3′-end VDR variants (BsmI, ApaI, TaqI) and Modic changes as well as the relationship of 5′-end variants (Cdx2, A1012G) with endplate defects. We also found significant interactions between the 3′- and 5′-end regulatory regions and endplate defects. Based on our results, VDR and its gene variants are highly associated with specific degenerative LDD endophenotypes.

Conclusion

Understanding relationships between phenotype and gene variants is crucial for describing the pathways leading to the multifactorial, polygenic degeneration process and LDD-related conditions.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords

VDR Lumbar disc degeneration Single-nucleotide polymorphism Haplotype Endophenotype 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7, 2007–2013) under Grant Agreement No. HEALTH-F2-2008-201626 (Genodisc Project). We thank Jill Urban and Jeremy Fairbank for commenting and editing the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

586_2019_6215_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (248 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 248 kb)
586_2019_6215_MOESM2_ESM.docx (49 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 48 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators (2018) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392(10159):1789–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Battie MC et al (1991) 1991 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Smoking and lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: an MRI study of identical twins. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(9):1015–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martirosyan NL et al (2016) Genetic alterations in intervertebral disc diseases. Front Surg 3:59PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Videman T et al (1998) Intragenic polymorphism of the vitamin D receptor gene associated with intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(23):2477–2485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jiang H et al (2017) Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and lumbar disc degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 26(1):267–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noponen-Hietala N et al (2003) Sequence variations in the collagen IX and XI genes are associated with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Ann Rheum Dis 62:1208–1214PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelempisioti A et al (2011) Genetic susceptibility of intervertebral disc degeneration among young Finnish adults. BMC Med Genet 12:153PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kawaguchi Y et al (2002) The association of lumbar disc disease with vitamin-D receptor gene polymorphism. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84-A(11):2022–2028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rajasekaran S et al (2016) How reliable are the reported genetic associations in disc degeneration?: The influence of phenotypes, age, population size, and inclusion sequence in 809 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(21):1649–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Battie MC et al (2014) Disc degeneration-related clinical phenotypes. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 3):S305–S314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bozsodi A et al (2016) Muscle strength is associated with vitamin D receptor gene variants. J Orthop Res 34(11):2031–2037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jamaludin A et al (2017) ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2017: automation of reading of radiological features from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the lumbar spine without human intervention is comparable with an expert radiologist. Eur Spine J 26(5):1374–1383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Segar AH et al (2016) The association between body mass index (BMI) and back or leg pain in patients with spinal conditions: results from the genodisc study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(20):E1237–E1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Szita J et al (2018) Risk factors of non-specific spinal pain in childhood. Eur Spine J 27(5):1119–1126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takatalo J et al (2009) Prevalence of degenerative imaging findings in lumbar magnetic resonance imaging among young adults. SPINE 34:1716–1721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gonzalez JR et al (2007) SNPassoc: an R package to perform whole genome association studies. Bioinformatics 23(5):644–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bao L et al (2017) Association between vitamin D receptor BsmI polymorphism and bone mineral density in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review of observational studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(17):e6718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu J et al (2016) Association between the vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and osteoporosis. Biomed Rep 5(2):233–236PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cheung KM et al (2006) Association of the TaqI allele in vitamin D receptor with degenerative disc disease and disc bulge in a Chinese population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(10):1143–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eser B et al (2010) Association of the polymorphisms of vitamin D receptor and aggrecan genes with degenerative disc disease. Genet Test Mol Biomark 14(3):313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones G et al (1998) Allelic variation in the vitamin D receptor, lifestyle factors and lumbar spinal degenerative disease. Ann Rheum Dis 57(2):94–99PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jordan KM et al (2005) Birthweight, vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism, and risk of lumbar spine osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 32(4):678–683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Videman T et al (2001) The relative roles of intragenic polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor gene in lumbar spine degeneration and bone density. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(3):E7–E12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yuan HY et al (2010) Matrix metalloproteinase-3 and vitamin D receptor genetic polymorphisms, and their interactions with occupational exposure in lumbar disc degeneration. J Occup Health 52(1):23–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin C et al (2017) Association between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and intervertebral disc degeneration: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sci 22(2):184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pabalan N et al (2017) Association between the FokI and ApaI polymorphisms in the Vitamin D receptor gene and intervertebral disc degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Genet Test Mol Biomark 21(1):24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fang Y et al (2005) Promoter and 3′-untranslated-region haplotypes in the vitamin d receptor gene predispose to osteoporotic fracture: the Rotterdam study. Am J Hum Genet 77(5):807–823PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hidekazu A et al (2001) The polymorphism in the caudal-related homeodomain protein Cdx-2 binding element in the human vitamin D receptor gene. J Bone Miner Res 16(7):1256–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Halsall JA et al (2004) A novel polymorphism in the 1A promoter region of the vitamin D receptor is associated with altered susceptibilty and prognosis in malignant melanoma. Br J Cancer 91(4):765–770PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gottesman II, Gould TD (2003) The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiatry 160(4):636–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Modic MT et al (1988) Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 166(1):193–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Crockett MT et al (2017) Modic type 1 vertebral endplate changes: injury, inflammation, or infection? Am J Roentgenol 209(1):167–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Burke JG et al (2002) Intervertebral discs which cause low back pain secrete high levels of proinflammatory mediators. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84(2):196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ohtori S et al (2006) Tumor necrosis factor-immunoreactive cells and PGP 9.5-immunoreactive nerve fibers in vertebral endplates of patients with discogenic low back pain and Modic type 1 or type 2 changes on MRI. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(9):1026–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    El Jilani MM et al (2015) Association between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and chronic periodontitis among Libyans. Libyan J Med 10(1):26771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jiang N et al (2016) Association of vitamin D receptor gene TaqI, BsmI, FokI and ApaI polymorphisms and susceptibility to extremity chronic osteomyelitis in Chinese population. Injury 47(8):1655–1660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tizaoui K, Hamzaoui K (2015) Association between VDR polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis disease: systematic review and updated meta-analysis of case-control studies. Immunobiology 220(6):807–816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fang Y et al (2003) Cdx-2 polymorphism in the promoter region of the human vitamin D receptor gene determines susceptibility to fracture in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res 18(9):1632–1641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Farfan HF (1982) Instability of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 165:110–123Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pockert AJ et al (2009) Modified expression of the ADAMTS enzymes and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3 during human intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Rheum 60(2):482–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Le Maitre CL, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA (2005) The role of interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis of human intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Res Ther 7(4):R732-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee S et al (2009) Comparison of growth factor and cytokine expression in patients with degenerated disc disease and herniated nucleus pulposus. Clin Biochem 42(15):1504–1511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hatano E et al (2006) Expression of ADAMTS-4 (aggrecanase-1) and possible involvement in regression of lumbar disc herniation. Spine 31(13):1426–1432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Patel KP et al (2007) Aggrecanases and aggrecanase-generated fragments in the human intervertebral disc at early and advanced stages of disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(23):2596–2603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tian Y et al (2013) Inflammatory cytokines associated with degenerative disc disease control aggrecanase-1 (ADAMTS-4) expression in nucleus pulposus cells through MAPK and NF-κB. Am J Pathol 182(6):2310–2321PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Howard SA, Koichi M, Nozomu I (2006) Intervertebral disc degeneration: biological and biomechanical factors. J Orthop Sci 11(5):541–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Biczo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Julia Szita
    • 1
    • 3
  • Iain McCall
    • 2
  • Peter Pal Varga
    • 1
  • the Genodisc Consortium
  • Aron Lazary
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.National Center for Spinal DisordersBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic ImagingThe Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District HospitalGobowen, OswestryUK
  3. 3.Semmelweis University School of Ph.D. StudiesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations