The efficacy of postoperative bracing after spine surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review

  • Davide NasiEmail author
  • Mauro Dobran
  • Giacomo Pavesi
Review Article



Postoperative bracing treatment is widely used after surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases. However, the guidelines are lacking in this regard, and its use is mainly driven by individual surgeon preferences. The objective of the current review was to evaluate the available evidence on the use of postoperative bracing after surgery for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.


The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed while conducting a systematic search of the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from January 1990 to January 2019. High-quality studies were included that evaluated disability, pain, quality of life, the rate of fusion, complications, and rate of reoperations in patients who had surgery for lumbar degenerative disease, with and without postoperative bracing. The overall strength of evidence across the studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.


Of the 391 citations screened, four randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Based on low- to moderate-quality evidence, postoperative bracing in patients with lumbar degenerative disease does not result in improved disability, pain, and quality of life compared to no bracing patients. Low-quality evidence suggests that there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the rate of fusion, complications, and the need for reoperation.


To date, there is not a medical evidence to support the use of bracing after surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.


Postoperative bracing Spine surgery for lumbar degenerative disease Lumbar spinal fusion Lumbar microdiscectomy Lumbar spine surgery 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.

Supplementary material

586_2019_6202_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (284 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 284 kb)


  1. 1.
    Yee AJ, Yoo JU, Marsolais EB et al (2008) Use of a postoperative lumbar corset after lumbar spinal arthrodesis for degenerative conditions of the spine: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(10):2062–2068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Soliman HA, Barchi S, Parent S et al (2017) The early impact of postoperative bracing on pain and quality of life following posterior instrumented fusion for lumbar degenerative conditions: a randomized trial. Spine 43(3):155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yao YC, Lin HH, Chang MC (2018) Bracing following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is not necessary for patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease: a prospective, randomized trial. Clin Spine Surg 1(9):E441–E445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zoia C, Bongetta D, Alicino C, Chimenti M, Pugliese R, Gaetani P (2018) Usefulness of corset adoption after single-level lumbar discectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Spine 28(5):481–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bible JE, Biswas D, Whang PG, Simpson AK, Rechtine GR, Grauer JN (2009) Postoperative bracing after spine surgery for degenerative conditions: a questionnaire study. Spine J 9(4):309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bogaert L, Van Wambeke P, Thys T et al (2019) Postoperative bracing after lumbar surgery: a survey amongst spinal surgeons in Belgium. Eur Spine J 28(2):442–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dailey AT, Ghogawala Z, Choudhri TF et al (2014) Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 14: brace therapy as an adjunct to or substitute for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 21(1):91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhu MP, Tetreault LA, Sorefan-Mangou F, Garwood P, Wilson JR (2018) Efficacy, safety, and economics of bracing after spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J 18(9):1513–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnsson R, Strömqvist B, Axelsson P, Selvik G (1992) Influence of spinal immobilization on consolidation of posterolateral lumbosacral fusion: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric and radiographic analysis. Spine 17:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Axelsson P, Johnsson R, Strömqvist B (1992) Effect of lumbar orthosis on intervertebral mobility: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine 17:678–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Axelsson P, Johnsson R, Strömqvist B (1993) Lumbar orthosis with unilateral hip immobilization: effect on intervertebral mobility determined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine 18:876–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Graichen F, Neff G (1999) Braces do not reduce loads on internal spinal fixation devices. Clin Biomech 14:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    North American Spine Society website. Clinical guidelines. Available from: Accessed 16th April 2018
  14. 14.
    Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Archer KR, Wegener ST, Seebach C et al (2011) The effect of fear of movement beliefs on pain and disability after surgery for lumbar and cervical degenerative conditions. Spine 36:1554–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Madera M, Brady J, Deily S et al (2017) The role of physical therapy and rehabilitation after lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative disease: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 26:694–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dobran M, Marini A, Nasi D et al (2017) Risk factors of surgical site infections in instrumented spine surgery. Surg Neurol Int 8:212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dobran M, Marini A, Gladi M et al (2017) Deep spinal infection in instrumented spinal surgery: diagnostic factors and therapy. G Chir 38:124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di ModenaUniversità degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmiliaModena, BaggiovaraItaly
  2. 2.Department of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti di AnconaUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations