The standing and sitting sagittal spinopelvic alignment of Chinese young and elderly population: does age influence the differences between the two positions?
To investigate the characteristics of standing and sitting spinopelvic sagittal alignment among Chinese healthy population with different age groups.
This cross-sectional, prospective study included a total of 235 volunteers aged 19 to 71 years. Volunteers were divided into two groups: group A (age ≤ 40 years; n = 140) and group B (age > 40 years, n = 95). Student’s t test was performed to compare the sagittal parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic tilt (PT) between standing and sitting positions of two groups. Multiple regression was performed to explore the influence factors of differences between two positions.
In the standing position, group B had larger SVA, TK, PT and TPA than group A. When moving from standing to sitting position, increased SVA and PT were found in both groups, accompanied by decreased LL and TK. However, despite similar change in SVA, group B presented with lesser changes in LL, PT and TPA than group A in sitting position. Age and gender independently influenced the difference in PT and LL.
In the standing position, the older volunteers showed larger SVA, TPA, TK, CL and PT than young population. Both groups showed similar changes when moving from standing to sitting, but the differences between the positions were smaller in older population. These characteristics in the standing and sitting positions of different age groups should be considered when planning surgical reconstruction of sagittal alignment.
KeywordsSitting Elderly Spinal deformity Sagittal alignment Standing
This study was funded by AOSPINE China Research Grant (2017-06).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
- 1.Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Ames CP, Kebaish K, Hart RA, Farcy JP, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E803–E812. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318292b7b9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Devos P, Ames CP, Fu KM, Burton D, Hostin R, Klineberg E, Gupta M, Deviren V, Mundis G, Hart R, Bess S, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group (2013) The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery 73:559–568. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000000012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Takemoto M, Boissière L, Vital J-M, Pellisé F, Perez-Grueso FJS, Kleinstück F, Acaroglu ER, Alanay A, Obeid I (2017) Are sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters significantly associated with quality of life of adult spinal deformity patients? Multivariate linear regression analyses for pre-operative and short-term post-operative health-related quality of life. Eur Spine J 26:2176–2186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4872-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstuck F, Perez-Grueso FJS, Acaroglu E, Haddad S, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A, European Spine Study Group (2017) Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1661–1672. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.16.01594 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, Henry JK, Gum J, Smith J, Hostin R, Shaffrey C, Kim HJ, Ames C, Scheer J, Klineberg E, Bess S, Burton D, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group (2016) Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy J-P, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity—postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35:2224–2231. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ee6bd4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Zhang HC, Zhang ZF, Wang ZH, Cheng JY, Wu YC, Fan YM, Wang TH, Wang Z (2017) Optimal pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for adult degenerative scoliosis. Orthop Surg 9:304–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12343 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Ryan DJ, Hostin R, Hart R, Burton D, Ames C, Shaffrey C, Bess S, Errico T, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group (2014) The T1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1631–1640. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.m.01459 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Iyer S, Lenke LG, Nemani VM, Albert TJ, Sides BA, Metz LN, Cunningham ME, Kim HJ (2016) Variations in sagittal alignment parameters based on age: a prospective study of asymptomatic volunteers using full-body radiographs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1826–1836. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001642 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Shimoda H, Ono M, Watanabe K (2016) Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects. Eur Spine J 25:3675–3686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4702-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Moon MS, Lee H, Kim ST, Kim SJ, Kim MS, Kim DS (2018) Spinopelvic orientation on radiographs in various body postures: upright standing, chair sitting, Japanese style kneel sitting, and Korean style cross-legged sitting. Clin Orthop Surg 10:322–327. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2018.10.3.322 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar