Advertisement

The standing and sitting sagittal spinopelvic alignment of Chinese young and elderly population: does age influence the differences between the two positions?

  • Siyu Zhou
  • Zhuoran Sun
  • Wei Li
  • Wei Wang
  • Tong Su
  • Chengbo Du
  • Weishi LiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the characteristics of standing and sitting spinopelvic sagittal alignment among Chinese healthy population with different age groups.

Method

This cross-sectional, prospective study included a total of 235 volunteers aged 19 to 71 years. Volunteers were divided into two groups: group A (age ≤ 40 years; n = 140) and group B (age > 40 years, n = 95). Student’s t test was performed to compare the sagittal parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic tilt (PT) between standing and sitting positions of two groups. Multiple regression was performed to explore the influence factors of differences between two positions.

Results

In the standing position, group B had larger SVA, TK, PT and TPA than group A. When moving from standing to sitting position, increased SVA and PT were found in both groups, accompanied by decreased LL and TK. However, despite similar change in SVA, group B presented with lesser changes in LL, PT and TPA than group A in sitting position. Age and gender independently influenced the difference in PT and LL.

Conclusion

In the standing position, the older volunteers showed larger SVA, TPA, TK, CL and PT than young population. Both groups showed similar changes when moving from standing to sitting, but the differences between the positions were smaller in older population. These characteristics in the standing and sitting positions of different age groups should be considered when planning surgical reconstruction of sagittal alignment.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords

Sitting Elderly Spinal deformity Sagittal alignment Standing 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by AOSPINE China Research Grant (2017-06).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Supplementary material

586_2019_6185_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (2.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 2325 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Ames CP, Kebaish K, Hart RA, Farcy JP, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E803–E812.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318292b7b9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shin EK, Kim CH, Chung CK, Choi Y, Yim D, Jung W, Park SB, Moon JH, Heo W, Kim SM (2017) Sagittal imbalance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and outcomes after simple decompression surgery. Spine J 17:175–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Devos P, Ames CP, Fu KM, Burton D, Hostin R, Klineberg E, Gupta M, Deviren V, Mundis G, Hart R, Bess S, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group (2013) The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery 73:559–568.  https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000000012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takemoto M, Boissière L, Vital J-M, Pellisé F, Perez-Grueso FJS, Kleinstück F, Acaroglu ER, Alanay A, Obeid I (2017) Are sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters significantly associated with quality of life of adult spinal deformity patients? Multivariate linear regression analyses for pre-operative and short-term post-operative health-related quality of life. Eur Spine J 26:2176–2186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4872-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstuck F, Perez-Grueso FJS, Acaroglu E, Haddad S, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A, European Spine Study Group (2017) Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1661–1672.  https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.16.01594 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rothenfluh DA, Mueller DA, Rothenfluh E, Min K (2015) Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch predisposes to adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 24:1251–1258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3454-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhu Z, Xu L, Zhu F, Jiang L, Wang Z, Liu Z, Qian BP, Qiu Y (2014) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis in asymptomatic adults: norms in Chinese populations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E1–E6.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, Henry JK, Gum J, Smith J, Hostin R, Shaffrey C, Kim HJ, Ames C, Scheer J, Klineberg E, Bess S, Burton D, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group (2016) Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:62–68.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hey HWD, Teo AQA, Tan KA, Ng LWN, Lau LL, Liu KG, Wong HK (2017) How the spine differs in standing and in sitting-important considerations for correction of spinal deformity. Spine J 17:799–806.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.03.056 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy J-P, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity—postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35:2224–2231.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ee6bd4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang HC, Zhang ZF, Wang ZH, Cheng JY, Wu YC, Fan YM, Wang TH, Wang Z (2017) Optimal pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for adult degenerative scoliosis. Orthop Surg 9:304–310.  https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12343 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berjano P, Langella F, Ismael MF, Damilano M, Scopetta S, Lamartina C (2014) Successful correction of sagittal imbalance can be calculated on the basis of pelvic incidence and age. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 6):587–596.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3556-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, Buchowski MS, Beech BM, Pate RR, Troiano RP (2008) Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. Am J Epidemiol 167:875–881.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm390 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vaughn JJ, Schwend RM (2014) Sitting sagittal balance is different from standing balance in children with scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 34:202–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Rinella A, Edwards NC (2005) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine J 3:115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee ES, Ko CW, Suh SW, Kumar S, Kang IK, Yang JH (2014) The effect of age on sagittal plane profile of the lumbar spine according to standing, supine, and various sitting positions. J Orthop Surg Res 9:11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799x-9-11 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suzuki H, Endo K, Mizuochi J, Murata K, Nishimura H, Matsuoka Y, Tanaka H, Yamamoto K, Tateiwa T (2016) Sagittal lumbo-pelvic alignment in the sitting position of elderly persons. J Orthop Sci 21:713–717.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2016.06.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Endo K, Suzuki H, Nishimura H, Tanaka H, Shishido T, Yamamoto K (2012) Sagittal lumbar and pelvic alignment in the standing and sitting positions. J Orthop Sci 17:682–686.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0281-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Ryan DJ, Hostin R, Hart R, Burton D, Ames C, Shaffrey C, Bess S, Errico T, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group (2014) The T1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1631–1640.  https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.m.01459 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Iyer S, Lenke LG, Nemani VM, Albert TJ, Sides BA, Metz LN, Cunningham ME, Kim HJ (2016) Variations in sagittal alignment parameters based on age: a prospective study of asymptomatic volunteers using full-body radiographs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1826–1836.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001642 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Shimoda H, Ono M, Watanabe K (2016) Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects. Eur Spine J 25:3675–3686.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4702-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS (2011) Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian health measures survey. Health Rep 22:7–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Castanharo R, Duarte M, McGill S (2014) Corrective sitting strategies: an examination of muscle activity and spine loading. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 24:114–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.11.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lazennec J-Y, Ramaré S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, Hansen S, Saillant G, Maurs L, Trabelsi R (2000) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Philippot R, Wegrzyn J, Farizon F, Fessy MH (2009) Pelvic balance in sagittal and Lewinnek reference planes in the standing, supine and sitting positions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:70–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2008.01.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moon MS, Lee H, Kim ST, Kim SJ, Kim MS, Kim DS (2018) Spinopelvic orientation on radiographs in various body postures: upright standing, chair sitting, Japanese style kneel sitting, and Korean style cross-legged sitting. Clin Orthop Surg 10:322–327.  https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2018.10.3.322 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV, Baikousis AG (1998) Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane in an asymptomatic Greek population. Spine 23:700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sohn S, Chung CK, Kim YJ, Han I, Kang SM, Yoon JW, Kim H (2017) Sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic patients over 30 years old in the Korean population. Acta Neurochir 159:1119–1128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3100-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hayashi T, Daubs MD, Suzuki A, Scott TP, Phan KH, Ruangchainikom M, Takahashi S, Shiba K, Wang JC (2015) Motion characteristics and related factors of Modic changes in the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 22:511–517.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14496 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siyu Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhuoran Sun
    • 1
  • Wei Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wei Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tong Su
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chengbo Du
    • 1
    • 2
  • Weishi Li
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Orthopaedic DepartmentPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
  2. 2.Peking University Health Science CenterBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations