Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 28, Issue 10, pp 2319–2324 | Cite as

Comparison of cervical sagittal parameters among patients with neck pain and healthy controls: a comparative cross-sectional study

  • Morteza Faghih Jouibari
  • Jean Charles Le Huec
  • Mohammad Hosein Ranjbar Hameghavandi
  • Navid Moghadam
  • Farzin Farahbakhsh
  • Masoud Khadivi
  • Mohsen RostamiEmail author
  • Ramin Kordi
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Previous studies have shown poor health-related outcomes among patients with spinal sagittal malalignment of the thoracolumbar or spinopelvic region, and less interest has been paid to the relationship between cervical sagittal balance and functional outcome of the patients. This study aims to compare the cervical sagittal parameters between patients with non-specific neck pain and asymptomatic controls.

Method

Twenty-five patients (21 females/4 males) with non-specific neck pain and 25 age-, sex- and BMI-matched controls (18 females/7 males) participated in the study. Using a standard lateral cervical radiography, the Cobb angle between occiput–C2, C1–C2, C1–C7 and C2–C7 as well as the thoracic inlet angle (TIA) and C7 and T1 slope angles was measured. Also the spine cranial angle (SCA) and the C2–SVA (sacral vertical axis) and C1–SVA were measured. The primary outcome measure of the study was comparison of the sagittal balance variables between the patients and the healthy controls. Secondary outcome measures were correlation between pain intensity of the patients in neck pain group and their demographic and radiographic findings. Data analysis was performed using independent sample T test and Pearson’s correlation for primary and secondary outcome measurements, respectively.

Results

There was no difference in cervical lordosis curvature (measured by C2–C7 and C1–C7 lordosis angle) between patients with non-specific NP and healthy controls (P value = 0.45 and 0.37, respectively). We found that T1 slope angle was significantly (P value = 0.02) lower in patients with neck pain.

Conclusion

Our findings showed that the slope of the upper endplate of T1 vertebrae body (T1 slope) is significantly lower among patients with non-specific neck pain compared to controls. A compensatory mechanism to bring the center of head gravity back to the spinal axis might be the possible explanation for this difference.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords

Sagittal balance Non-specific neck pain Malalignment 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

This work was supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Supplementary material

586_2019_6117_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (140 kb)
Supplementary file1 (PPTX 140 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Haldeman S, Carroll L, Cassidy JD, Schubert J, Nygren Å (2008) The bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Eur Spine J 17:5–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0619-8 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M (2012) Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2163–2196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McLean SM, May S, Klaber-Moffett J, Sharp DM, Gardiner E (2010) Risk factors for the onset of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Commun Health 64:565–572.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.090720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nguyen N-LM, Baluch DA, Patel AA (2014) Cervical sagittal balance: a review. Contemp Spine Surg 15:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CSS.0000441214.29279.d0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 30:2024–2029.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Le Huec JC, Saddiki R, Franke J, Rigal J, Aunoble S (2011) Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line: the basics. Eur Spine J 20:558–563.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1939-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gore DR (2001) Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a ten-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2463–2466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moon BJ, Choi KH, Yun C, Ha Y (2015) Cross-sectional study of neck pain and cervical sagittal alignment in air force pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 86:445–451.  https://doi.org/10.3357/amhp.4123.2015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iyer S, Nemani VM, Nguyen J, Elysee J, Burapachaisri A, Ames CP, Kim HJ (2016) Impact of cervical sagittal alignment parameters on neck disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:371–377.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grob D, Frauenfelder H, Mannion AF (2007) The association between cervical spine curvature and neck pain. Eur Spine J 16:669–678.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0254-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JH, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kwon TH, Park YK, Moon HJ (2015) The relationship between neck pain and cervical alignment in young female nursing staff. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 58:231–235.  https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.3.231 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fujiwara H, Oda T, Makino T, Moriguchi Y, Yonenobu K, Kaito T (2018) Impact of cervical sagittal alignment on axial neck pain and health-related quality of life after cervical laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study. Clin Spine Surg 31:E245–E251.  https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000619 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsunoda D, Iizuka Y, Iizuka H, Nishinome M, Kobayashi R, Ara T, Yamamoto A, Takagishi K (2013) Associations between neck and shoulder pain (called katakori in Japanese) and sagittal spinal alignment parameters among the general population. J Orthop Sci 18:216–219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0341-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee JH, Park YK, Kim JH (2014) Chronic neck pain in young adults: perspectives on anatomic differences. Spine J 14:2628–2638.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.039 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uchida K, Nakajima H, Sato R, Yayama T, Mwaka ES, Kobayashi S, Baba H (2009) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with kyphosis or sagittal sigmoid alignment: outcome after anterior or posterior decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 11:521–528.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.2.spine08385 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miyazaki M, Hymanson HJ, Morishita Y, He W, Zhang H, Wu G, Kong MH, Tsumura H, Wang JC (2008) Kinematic analysis of the relationship between sagittal alignment and disc degeneration in the cervical spine. Spine 33:E870–E876.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181839733 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guzman J, Hurwitz EL, Carroll LJ, Haldeman S, Côté P, Carragee EJ, Peloso PM, van der Velde G, Holm LW, Hogg-Johnson S, Nordin M, Cassidy JD (2008) A new conceptual model of neck pain: linking onset, course, and care: the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine 33:S14–S23.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643efb CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH, Glassman SD, Suk S-I, Cha CW (2005) Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36″ radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine 30:427–433.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000153698.94091.f8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carreon LY, Smith CL, Dimar JR, Glassman SD (2016) Correlation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters on full-length spine radiographs compared with dedicated cervical radiographs. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11:12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-016-0072-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weng C, Wang J, Tuchman A, Wang J, Fu C, Hsieh PC, Buser Z, Wang JC (2016) Influence of T1 slope on the cervical sagittal balance in degenerative cervical spine: an analysis using kinematic MRI. Spine 41:185–190.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001353 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Silber JS, Lipetz JS, Hayes VM, Lonner BS (2004) Measurement variability in the assessment of sagittal alignment of the cervical spine: a comparison of the Gore and Cobb methods. Clin Spine Surg 17:301–305.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000095824.98982.53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20:1351–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F (2010) The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J 10:994–998.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ling FP, Chevillotte T, Leglise A, Thompson W, Bouthors C, Le Huec JC (2018) Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review. Eur Spine J 27:8–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5462-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41:1149–1160.  https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gay RE (1993) The curve of the cervical spine: variations and significance. J Manip Physiol Ther 16:591–594Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kumagai G, Ono A, Numasawa T, Wada K, Inoue R, Iwasaki H, Ishibashi Y, Iwane K, Matsuzaka M, Takahashi I, Umeda T, Nakaji S (2014) Association between roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine and neck symptoms in a Japanese community population. J Orthop Sci 19:390–397.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0549-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Yoshiaki T, Shiga H (1998) Cervical curvature in acute whiplash injuries: prospective comparative study with asymptomatic subjects. Injury 29:775–778.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(98)00184-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McAviney J, Schulz D, Bock R, Harrison DE, Holland B (2005) Determining the relationship between cervical lordosis and neck complaints. J Manip Physiol Ther 28:187–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee S-H, Kim K-T, Seo E-M, Suk K-S, Kwack Y-H, Son E-S (2012) The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults. Clin Spine Surg 25:E41–E47.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182396301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee S-H, Son E-S, Seo E-M, Suk K-S, Kim K-T (2015) Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment. Spine J 15:705–712.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.059 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Panjabi MM, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, Grauer J, Babat LB, Dvorak J (1998) Critical load of the human cervical spine: an in vitro experimental study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 13:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Okada E, Matsumoto M, Ichihara D, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, Nishiwaki Y, Takahata T (2011) Cross-sectional area of posterior extensor muscles of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: a 10-year longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Spine J 20:1567–1573.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1774-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Noormohammadpour P, Mansournia MA, Koohpayehzadeh J, Asgari F, Rostami M, Rafei A, Kordi R (2017) Prevalence of chronic neck pain, low back pain, and knee pain and their related factors in community-dwelling adults in Iran: a population-based national study. Clin J Pain 33:181–187.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0000000000000396 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morteza Faghih Jouibari
    • 1
  • Jean Charles Le Huec
    • 2
  • Mohammad Hosein Ranjbar Hameghavandi
    • 3
  • Navid Moghadam
    • 3
  • Farzin Farahbakhsh
    • 1
    • 3
  • Masoud Khadivi
    • 1
  • Mohsen Rostami
    • 4
    Email author
  • Ramin Kordi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati HospitalTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Spine Unit 2University Victor SegalenBordeauxFrance
  3. 3.Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience InstituteTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  4. 4.Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Imam HospitalTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations