The most appropriate cervical vertebra for the measurement of occipitocervical inclination parameter: a validation study of C3, C4, and C5 levels using multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging
- 4 Downloads
To evaluate which cervical level is the most appropriate level to measure occipitocervical inclination (OCI).
Sixty-two patients with multi-positional MRI: 24 males and 38 females, who had cervical lordosis and had a disk degeneration grade of 3 or less were included. We measured patient’s OCI at C3, C4, and C5, occipitocervical angle (OCA), occipitocervical distance (OCD), C2–7 angle, and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) in neutral, flexion, and extension position. The correlation between OCI and OCA, OCD, C2–7 angle, and cSVA on each cervical level in all three positions was tested using Pearson’s correlation coefficient test. The difference between OCIs at each cervical level was tested by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. p value of less than 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level.
C5 OCI showed statistically significant correlation with OCA, OCD, C2–7 angle, and cSVA in all three positions (p < 0.05, r = 0.214–0.525). C3 OCI in flexion (p = 0.393, r = 0.081) and C4 OCI in neutral and flexion (neutral p = 0.275, r 0.104; flexion p = 0.987, r = 0.002) did not show significant correlation with C2–7 angle. There was a statistically significant difference between C3, C4, and C5 OCIs in neutral and extension position (p < 0.05). At the same time, OCI showed statistically strong correlation between adjacent cervical levels (p < 0.001, r = 0.627–0.822).
C5 cervical level is the most appropriate level for OCI measurement. OCI should be measured at the same cervical level at all time. C4 OCI can reliably substitute C5 OCI in case C5 which is invisible on radiographic image.
KeywordsOccipitocervical Occipitocervical alignment Occipitocervical parameters Occipitocervical inclination Occipitocervical angle
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest for the current study.
Disclosures outside of submitted work: ZB- consultancy: Xenco Medical, AO Spine (past); Research Support: SeaSpine (paid directly to institution); JCW - Royalties – Biomet, Seaspine, Amedica, DePuy Synthes; Investments/Options – Bone Biologics, Pearldiver, Electrocore, Surgitech; Board of Directors - North American Spine Society, AO Foundation (20,000 honorariums for board position, plus travel for board meetings), Cervical Spine Research Society; Editorial Boards - Spine, The Spine Journal, Clinical Spine Surgery, Global Spine Journal; Fellowship Funding (paid directly to institution): AO Foundation.
- 5.Izeki M, Neo M, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Ito H, Nagai K, Matsuda S (2014) The O-C2 angle established at occipito-cervical fusion dictates the patient’s destiny in terms of postoperative dyspnea and/or dysphagia. Eur Spine J 23(2):328–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2963-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Suzuki A, Daubs MD, Inoue H, Hayashi T, Aghdasi B, Montgomery SR, Ruangchainikom M, Hu X, Lee CJ, Wang CJ, Wang BJ, Nakamura H (2013) Prevalence and motion characteristics of degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis in the symptomatic adult. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(17):E1115–E1120. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829b1487 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Ruangchainikom M, Daubs MD, Suzuki A, Hayashi T, Weintraub G, Lee CJ, Inoue H, Tian H, Aghdasi B, Scott TP, Phan KH, Chotivichit A, Wang JC (2014) Effect of cervical kyphotic deformity type on the motion characteristics and dynamic spinal cord compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(12):932–938. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Paholpak P, Tamai K, Shoell K, Sessumpun K, Buser Z, Wang JC (2017) Can multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging be used to evaluate angular parameters in cervical spine? A comparison of multi-positional MRI to dynamic plain radiograph. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5306-1 Google Scholar
- 17.Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK, Schwab FJ, Le Huec JC, Massicotte EM, Patel AA, Traynelis VC, Kim HJ, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Lafage V (2013) Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22 Suppl 1):S149–S160. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Evans JD (1996) Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar