Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1441–1447 | Cite as

Indirect foraminal decompression and improvement in the lumbar alignment after percutaneous cement discoplasty

  • Laszlo Kiss
  • Peter Pal Varga
  • Zsolt Szoverfi
  • Gabor Jakab
  • Peter Endre Eltes
  • Aron LazaryEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure, that can provide a segmental stabilizing and indirect decompression effect in case of severely degenerated discs characterized by vacuum phenomenon. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of PCD on spinopelvic radiological parameters and their associations with the clinical outcome.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected dataset of 28 patients (112 lumbar segments) who underwent single- or multilevel PCD was performed. Spinopelvic, intrasegmental and intersegmental parameters were measured on lumbar X-rays pre-, postoperatively and 6 months after the surgery. Correlations between radiological parameters and clinical outcome data were determined.

Results

Sacral slope significantly increased (p < .001), and pelvic tilt (p < .05) was decreased after the PCD procedure. Segmental and total lordosis (p < .05, p < .05) disc and foraminal height showed significantly increase (p < .001, p < .001) after procedure. Pain and disability (ODI) significantly decreased due to PCD. An association was found between postoperative increase in SS and improvement in ODI (r = 0.39, p < .05). The change in low back pain was correlated with segmental scoliosis correction (p < .001). Moderate correlation was detected between the increase in disc height and ODI (p < .05) as well as leg pain (p < .01).

Conclusion

PCD is an effective minimally invasive technique to treat axial pain and disability related to severe lumbar disc degeneration. Our study shows that an improvement in lumbar alignment and a significant indirect foraminal decompression could be achieved with the procedure. These changes can significantly contribute to the pain relief and increase in the patients’ functional capacity.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords

Percutaneous cement discoplasty Radiological parameters Outcome Lumbar alignment Indirect foraminal decompression 

Notes

Funding

Aron Lazary has received research grants from the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund, Budapest, Hungary, Award number: OTKA FK123884.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

586_2019_5966_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (157 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 156 kb)
586_2019_5966_MOESM2_ESM.docx (54 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 53 kb)
586_2019_5966_MOESM3_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 13 kb)
586_2019_5966_MOESM4_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Shah AMKSYJ, Chan WCW, Chan D (2017) Intervertebral disc degeneration. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26:1873–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams MA, Dolan P (2012) Intervertebral disc degeneration: evidence for two distinct phenotypes. J Anat 221:497–506.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01551.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leone A, Guglielmi G, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Bonomo L (2007) Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology 245:62–77.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2451051359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dolan P, Luo J, Pollintine P, Landham PR, Stefanakis M, Adams MA (2013) Intervertebral disc decompression following endplate damage: implications for disc degeneration depend on spinal level and age. Spine 38:1473–1481.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318290f3cc CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Varga PP, Jakab G, Bors IB, Lazary A, Szoverfi Z (2015) Experiences with PMMA cement as a stand-alone intervertebral spacer: percutaneous cement discoplasty in the case of vacuum phenomenon within lumbar intervertebral discs. Der Orthopade 44(Suppl 1):S1–S7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-014-3060-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sola C, Camino Willhuber G, Kido G, Pereira Duarte M, Bendersky M, Mereles M, Petracchi M, Gruenberg M (2018) Percutaneous cement discoplasty for the treatment of advanced degenerative disk disease in elderly patients. Eur Spine J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5547-7 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 33:90–94.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beyer F, Geier F, Bredow J, Oppermann J, Eysel P, Sobottke R (2015) Influence of spinopelvic parameters on non-operative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Technol Health Care 23:871–879.  https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-151032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chapman TM Jr, Baldus CR, Lurie JD, Glassman SD, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Boachie-Adjei O, Kim HJ, Smith JS, Crawford CH 3rd, Lenke LG, Buchowski JM, Edwards C 2nd, Koski T, Parent S, Lewis S, Kang DG, McClendon J Jr, Metz L, Zebala LP, Kelly MP, Spratt KF, Bridwell KH (2016) Baseline patient-reported outcomes correlate weakly with radiographic parameters: a multicenter, prospective NIH adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis study of 286 patients. Spine 41:1701–1708.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eskilsson K, Sharma D, Johansson C, Hedlund R (2017) The impact of spinopelvic morphology on the short-term outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in 104 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 27:74–80.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simon J, Longis PM, Passuti N (2017) Correlation between radiographic parameters and functional scores in degenerative lumbar and thoracolumbar scoliosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:285–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Castellvi AE, Nienke TW, Marulanda GA, Murtagh RD, Santoni BG (2014) Indirect decompression of lumbar stenosis with transpsoas interbody cages and percutaneous posterior instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:1784–1791.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3464-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malham GM, Parker RM, Goss B, Blecher CM (2015) Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study. European Spine J 24(Suppl 3):339–345.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3807-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pereira EA, Farwana M, Lam KS (2017) Extreme lateral interbody fusion relieves symptoms of spinal stenosis and low-grade spondylolisthesis by indirect decompression in complex patients. J Clin Neurosci 35:56–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Endo K, Suzuki H, Tanaka H, Kang Y, Yamamoto K (2010) Sagittal spinal alignment in patients with lumbar disc herniation. European Spine J 19:435–438.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1240-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Spinal Disorders, Buda Health CenterBudapestHungary
  2. 2.In Silico Biomechanics Laboratory, National Center for Spinal DisordersBuda Health CenterBudapestHungary
  3. 3.School of PhD StudiesSemmelweis UniversityBudapestHungary
  4. 4.Department of Musculosceletal OncologySemmelweis UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations