Reliability and validity of self-reported questionnaires to measure pain and disability in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: part 3—a systematic review from the CADRE Collaboration
To determine the reliability and validity of self-reported questionnaires to measure pain and disability in adults with grades I–IV neck pain and its associated disorders (NAD).
We updated the systematic review of the 2000–2010 Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders and systematically searched databases from 2005 to 2017. Independent reviewers screened and critically appraised studies using standardized tools. Evidence from low-risk-of-bias studies was synthesized according to best evidence synthesis principles. Validity studies were ranked according to the Sackett and Haynes classification.
We screened 2823 articles, and 26 were eligible for critical appraisal; 18 were low risk of bias. Preliminary evidence suggests that the Neck Disability Index (original and short versions), Whiplash Disability Questionnaire, Neck Pain Driving Index, and ProFitMap-Neck may be valid and reliable to measure disability in patients with NAD. We found preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of pain measurements including the Body Pain Diagram, Visual Analogue Scale, the Numeric Rating Scale and the Pain-DETECT Questionnaire.
The evidence supporting the validity and reliability of instruments used to measure pain and disability is preliminary. Further validity studies are needed to confirm the clinical utility of self-reported questionnaires to assess pain and disability in patients with NAD.
KeywordsNeck pain Disability Self-reported questionnaire Reliability/validity Systematic review
The authors acknowledge and thank Mrs. Sophie Despeyroux, librarian at the Haute Autorité de Santé, for her suggestions and review of the search strategy. This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada Research Chairs program to Dr. Pierre Côté, Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology.
This study was funded by the Institut Franco-Européen de Chiropraxie, the Association Française de Chiropraxie and the Fondation de Recherche en Chiropraxie in France. None of these associations were involved in the collection of data, data analysis, interpretation of data, or drafting of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Lemeunier N, da Silva-Oolup S, Chow N, Southerst D, Carroll L, Wong JJ, Shearer H, Mastragostino P, Cox J, Côté E, Murnaghan K, Sutton D, Cȏté P (2017) Reliability and validity of clinical tests to assess the anatomical integrity of the cervical spine in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: Part 1. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration. European Spine J 26(9):2225–2241Google Scholar
- 4.Moser N, Lemeunier N, Southerst D, Shearer H, Murnaghan K, Sutton D, Côté P (2017) Validity and reliability of clinical tests to assess the cervical spine injuries in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: Part 2. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration. European Spine J 27(6):1219–1233Google Scholar
- 5.Lemeunier N, da Silva-Oolup S, Olesen K, Carroll LJ, Shearer H, Wong JJ, Brady OD, Côté E, Stern P, Sutton D, Suri M, Torres P, Tuff T, Murnaghan K, Côté P (2019) Reliability and validity of clinical tests to assess measurements of pain and disability in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: Part 3. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration. European Spine J (accepted)Google Scholar
- 6.Lemeunier N, Jeoun EB, Suri M, Tuff T, Shearer H, Mior S, Wong JJ, da Silva-Oolup S, Torres P, D’Silva C, Stern P, Yu H, Millan M, Sutton, Murnaghan K, Cȏté P (2018) Reliability and validity of clinical tests to assess the posture, pain location and cervical mobility in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: Part 4. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 38:128–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Lemeunier N, Suri M, Welsh P, Shearer H, Nordin M, Wong JJ, Torres, da Silva-Oolup S, D’Silva C, Jeoun EB, Stern P, Yu H, Murnaghan K, Sutton D, Côté P (2018) Reliability and validity of clinical tests to assess the functionality of the cervical spine in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: Part 5. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration. European J Physiotherapy (submitted)Google Scholar
- 8.Guzman J, Hurwitz EL, Carroll LJ et al (2010) A new conceptual model for neck pain—linking onset, course, and care: The Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(4):101–122Google Scholar
- 9.Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E (1995) Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(8 Suppl):1S–73S (Review. Erratum in: Spine 1995 Nov 1;20(21):2372) Google Scholar
- 10.Holbrook A. Self-reported measure. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/encyclopedia-of-survey-research-methods/n523.xml
- 11.Jarvis M, Russel J. Chapter 4—Research methods. In: Broché (ed) Exploring psychology: AS student book for AQA A, Broché Editions, p 91Google Scholar
- 14.World Health Organization (2016) World Health Organization [internet]. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Disabilities; 2016 [cited 4 Oct 2016]. http://www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en/
- 15.Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Fletcher GS (2012) Clinical epidemiology: the essentials, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 20.Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37(5):360–363Google Scholar
- 21.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Grp P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Br Med J 89(9):873–880Google Scholar
- 29.Southerst D, Stupar M, Côté P, Mior S, Stern P (2013) The reliability of measuring pain distribution and location using body pain diagrams in patients with acute whiplash-associated disorders. National University of Health Sciences, Lombard, pp 395–402Google Scholar
- 39.Ferrari R, Russell A, Kelly AJ (2006) Assessing whiplash recovery—the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire. Aust Fam Physician 35(8):653–654Google Scholar
- 42.Odole AC, Adegoke BO, Akomas NC (2011) Validity and test re-test reliability of the neck disability index in the Nigerian clinical setting. Afr J Med Med Sci 40(2):135–138Google Scholar
- 49.Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL et al (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19(4):539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. JMPT 14:409–415Google Scholar