Advertisement

Functional outcome of surgically treated U-shaped sacral fractures: experience from 41 cases

  • Li He
  • Chengla YiEmail author
  • David J. Hak
  • Zhiyong Hou
Original Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To delineate the changes in functional outcomes of surgically treated U-shaped sacral fractures.

Methods

Forty-one patients with U-shaped sacral fractures were followed for a mean of 4.1 years after surgery. Impairment of lower extremities was assessed via a modified Gibbons score. Urinary function was assessed with a structured interview and residual urine volume. Sexual and bowel functions, as well as patient-reported health, were evaluated using a structured interview, and pain was evaluated with the visual analog scale. Comparisons of data at different time points were conducted with a mixed model, and Z-scores of the SF-36 questionnaire were calculated.

Results

Forty patients reported pain at 1 year and demonstrated no change at 2 years (p = 0.24). Thirty-six of 39 eligible patients had neurological deficits involving the lower extremities at baseline and demonstrated improvement at 1 year (p = 0.0002) but not between years 1 and 2 (p = 0.47). Twenty-three of 38 eligible patients had impaired bladder function, and 13 of 35 eligible patients had impaired bowel function at 3 months. Urinary function was worse at 2 years than at 1 year (p = 0.02). Sexual dysfunction was common, and patient-reported health was significantly worse than that of the normal population.

Conclusions

Neurological function in the lower extremities of patients with U-shaped sacral fractures improved after surgery; however, bowel and sexual functions did not change, and urinary function deteriorated over time. The majority of impairments appear to be permanent if still present at 1 year after surgery.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords

U-shaped sacral fractures Functional outcome Neurological deficits Patient-reported health Surgical treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Yin Li for assisting in statistical analysis and outcome interpretation. Yin Li is from State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in the submission of this manuscript.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Supplementary material

586_2019_5900_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (3.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 3442 kb)
586_2019_5900_MOESM2_ESM.tif (8.9 mb)
Supplementary Fig. 1 Images showing the variations in U-shaped sacral fractures, including the U-shaped (a), H-shaped (b), T-shaped (c), and Y-shaped (d) pattern (TIFF 9089 kb)
586_2019_5900_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 12 kb)
586_2019_5900_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (XLSX 10 kb)
586_2019_5900_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (10 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (XLSX 10 kb)
586_2019_5900_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (XLSX 12 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kaye ID, Yoon RS, Stickney W, Snavely J, Vaccaro AR, Liporace FA (2018) Treatment of spinopelvic dissociation: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 6(1):e7.  https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.16.00119 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strange-Vognsen HH, Lebech A (1991) An unusual type of fracture in the upper sacrum. J Orthop Trauma 5(2):200–203Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Gagna G, Mazel C (1985) Transverse fracture of the upper sacrum. Suicidal jumper’s fracture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10(9):838–845Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lindahl J, Makinen TJ, Koskinen SK, Soderlund T (2014) Factors associated with outcome of spinopelvic dissociation treated with lumbopelvic fixation. Injury 45(12):1914–1920.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.09.003 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gribnau AJ, van Hensbroek PB, Haverlag R, Ponsen KJ, Been HD, Goslings JC (2009) U-shaped sacral fractures: surgical treatment and quality of life. Injury 40(10):1040–1048.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.11.027 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yi C, Hak DJ (2012) Traumatic spinopelvic dissociation or U-shaped sacral fracture: a review of the literature. Injury 43(4):402–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.12.011 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adelved A, Totterman A, Glott T, Hellund JC, Madsen JE, Roise O (2016) Long-term functional outcome after traumatic lumbosacral dissociation. A retrospective case series of 13 patients. Injury 47(7):1562–1568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.006 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Markel DC, Raskas DS, Graziano GP (1993) A case of traumatic spino-pelvic dissociation. J Orthop Trauma 7(6):562–566Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vresilovic EJ, Mehta S, Placide R, Milam RAT (2005) Traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(5):1098–1103.  https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.d.01925 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lam CL, Tse EY, Gandek B, Fong DY (2005) The SF-36 summary scales were valid, reliable, and equivalent in a Chinese population. J Clin Epidemiol 58(8):815–822.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.008 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM (1999) Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 11(6):319–326Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr. (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208.  https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278597 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adelved A, Totterman A, Glott T, Madsen JE, Roise O (2012) Functional outcome 10 years after surgical treatment of displaced sacral fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(16):E1009–E1016.  https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31823a0d83 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keel MJ, Benneker LM, Siebenrock KA, Bastian JD (2011) Less invasive lumbopelvic stabilization of posterior pelvic ring instability: technique and preliminary results. J Trauma 71(3):E62–E70.  https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182092e66 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taguchi T, Kawai S, Kaneko K, Yugue D (1999) Operative management of displaced fractures of the sacrum. J Orthop Sci 4(5):347–352Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kulkarni MV, McArdle CB, Kopanicky D, Miner M, Cotler HB, Lee KF, Harris JH (1987) Acute spinal cord injury: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 164(3):837–843.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.164.3.3615885 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wintermark M, Mouhsine E, Theumann N, Mordasini P, van Melle G, Leyvraz PF, Schnyder P (2003) Thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients who have sustained severe trauma: depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 227(3):681–689.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2273020592 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schildhauer TA, Bellabarba C, Nork SE, Barei DP, Routt ML Jr., Chapman JR (2006) Decompression and lumbopelvic fixation for sacral fracture-dislocations with spino-pelvic dissociation. J Orthop Trauma 20(7):447–457Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rui W, Cheng W, Ma XQ, Zhao YF, Yan XY, Jia H (2011) Health-related quality of life in Chinese people: a population-based survey of five cities in China. Scand J Public Health 39(4):410–418.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810395817 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wyndaele JJ (1997) Correlation between clinical neurological data and urodynamic function in spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord 35(4):213–216Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramer LM, Ramer MS, Bradbury EJ (2014) Restoring function after spinal cord injury: towards clinical translation of experimental strategies. Lancet Neurol 13(12):1241–1256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70144-9 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Siebler JC, Hasley BP, Mormino MA (2010) Functional outcomes of Denis zone III sacral fractures treated nonoperatively. J Orthop Trauma 24(5):297–302.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ccb645 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nork SE, Jones CB, Harding SP, Mirza SK, Routt ML Jr. (2001) Percutaneous stabilization of U-shaped sacral fractures using iliosacral screws: technique and early results. J Orthop Trauma 15(4):238–246Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huittinen VM (1972) Lumbosacral nerve injury in fracture of the pelvis. A postmortem radiographic and patho-anatomical study. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 429:3–43Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sabiston CP, Wing PC (1986) Sacral fractures: classification and neurologic implications. J Trauma 26(12):1113–1115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Traumatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical CollegeHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedics, Denver Health Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineDenverUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryThe Third Hospital of HeBei Medical UniversityShijiazhuangChina

Personalised recommendations