Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 883–884 | Cite as

Letter to the Editor concerning “Comparison of combined anterior–posterior approach versus posterior-only approach in neuromuscular scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis” by Shao ZX, et al. [Eur Spine J; (2018) 27(9): 2213–2222]

  • Fei Jia
  • Jianmin SunEmail author
Letter to the Editor

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Fei Jia and Jianmin Sun declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Shao ZX, Fang X, Lv QB, Hu ZC, Shao SY, Hu YB et al (2018) Comparison of combined anterior–posterior approach versus posterior-only approach in neuromuscular scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 27(9):2213–2222.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5702-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keeler KA, Lenke LG, Good CR, Bridwell KH, Sides B, Luhmann SJ (2010) Spinal fusion for spastic neuromuscular scoliosis: is anterior releasing necessary when intraoperative halo-femoral traction is used? Spine 35:E427–E433.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d9527e CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D, Boutron I (2017) Chapter 10: addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.2.0. https://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed 11 Nov 2018
  4. 4.
    Çeçen GS, Gülabi D, Güçlü B, Çeçen DA, Oltulu İ (2016) Comparison of pedicle screw fixation and hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 50(3):351–355.  https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2016.14.0095 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SpineShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations