The extended posterior approach for resection of sacral tumours
- 104 Downloads
The conventional posterior approach is mostly advocated for excision of sacral tumours below S2. We describe an operative technique of single-stage en bloc resection of sacral tumours, extending up to S1, through an extended posterior approach.
Nine patients, who had undergone resection of sacral tumours, by the described technique formed the basis of this study. Four patients had chordomas, whereas schwannoma, neurilemmoma, giant-cell tumour, malignant paraganglioma and recurrent Ewing’s sarcoma were seen in one patient each. They were followed up at regular intervals with a mean follow-up of 45.4 months. Perioperative complications, their functional and oncological outcomes at final follow-up were analysed.
None of the patients had any perioperative complications like uncontrolled haemorrhage, injury to the rectum, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. One patient had a superficial wound infection which subsided with regular dressing, and another patient developed a wound breakdown that required an additional flap procedure. At final follow-up, six patients were able to walk without any assistive devices, six patients had normal bladder function, and five patients had normal bowel function. Five patients did not have any recurrence at final follow-up, whereas two were alive with the disease and two had died.
The reported technique allows en bloc resection of sacral tumours up to S1, through a posterior-only approach. It is less invasive with minimal morbidity. The functional and oncological outcomes are similar to those reported by other investigators.
KeywordsSacral tumours Surgical resection Posterior approach
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Institutional ethical clearance was obtained before starting the study.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Gennari LE, Azzarelli AL, Quagliuolo VI (1987) A posterior approach for the excision of sacral chordoma. Bone Joint J 69(4):565–568Google Scholar
- 7.Fuchs B, Dickey ID, Yaszemski MJ, Inwards CY, Sim FH (2005) Operative management of sacral chordoma. JBJS 87(10):2211–2216Google Scholar