Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 762–767 | Cite as

Unilateral sacroiliitis: differentiating infective and inflammatory etiology by magnetic resonance imaging and tissue studies

  • Rishi Mugesh KannaEmail author
  • Aju Bosco
  • Ajoy Prasad Shetty
  • S. Rajasekaran
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Unilateral sacroiliitis (US) is an uncommon disease with varied etiology. The differentiation between infective and inflammatory causes for US based on MRI alone is often difficult. We studied the efficacy of MRI findings in comparison with tissue studies in the diagnosis of US.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients who presented with US and evaluated with MRI, biopsy for histopathology and tissue cultures was performed. Patients with bilateral sacroiliitis, traumatic and postpartum sacroiliitis were excluded. Based on defined MRI criteria, the patients were divided into two groups—infective (group A) and inflammation (group B).

Results

In total, 33 patients (mean age—33.4 ± 17.2 years) with MRI features of US had presented with unilateral gluteal pain (100%) and positive Patrick’s test (91.9%). Based on the MRI features of severe subchondral marrow edema, widening of joint space, intra-articular abscess and periarticular muscle abscess, infective sacroiliitis (A) was diagnosed in 20/33 (60.6% cases). A total of 13/33 (39.3%) patients had features of inflammation (B), based on the following MRI criteria—subchondral sclerosis with minimal edema, erosions, maintained joint space without abscess/destruction. Tissue evidence of infection was positive in 13/20 (65%) patients in group A while it was negative in all group B patients.

Conclusion

MRI had high sensitivity (71%) and 100% specificity in diagnosing inflammatory sacroiliitis while it had low specificity, but 100% sensitivity for diagnosing infective sacroiliitis. Hence, patients diagnosed as inflammatory sacroiliitis in MRI are unlikely to benefit from further tissue studies while percutaneous biopsy is recommended in patients diagnosed in MRI as infective sacroiliitis.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Sacroiliitis Tubercular Pyogenic Inflammatory MRI Tissue studies 

Notes

Funding

The study was funded by the Ganga Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation (GOREF).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Muche B, Bollow M, Francois RJ, Sieper J, Hamm B, Braun J (2003) Anatomic structures involved in early and late-stage sacroiliitis in spondylarthritis: a detailed analysis by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 48:1374–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hermet M, Minichiello E, Flipo RM et al (2012) Infectious sacroiliitis: a retrospective, multicenter study of 39 adults. BMC Infect Dis 12:305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramlakan RJ, Govender S (2007) Sacroiliac joint tuberculosis. Int Orthop 31:121–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Floman Y, Milgrom C, Gomori JM, Kenan S, Ezra Y, Liebergall M (1994) Acute postpartum inflammatory sacroiliitis. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(6):887–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacobson JA, Girish G, Jiang Y, Sabb B (2008) Radiographic evaluation of arthritis: degenerative joint diseases. Radiology 248:737–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Canella C, Schau B, Ribeiro E, Sbaffi B, Marchiori E (2013) MRI in seronegative spondyloarthritis: imaging features and differential diagnosis in the spine and sacroiliac joints. AJR 200:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tuli SM, Jaypee Brothers Publication; New Delhi (2010) Tuberculosis of the skeletal system (bones, joints, spine and bursal sheaths), pp 3–15Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osman AA, Govender S (1995) Septic sacroiliitis. Clin Orthop 313:214–219Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Attarian DE (2001) Septic sacroiliitis: the overlooked diagnosis. J South Orthop Assoc 10(1):57–60Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldberg J, Kovarsky J (1983) Tuberculous sacroiliitis. South Med J 76(9):1175–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stürzenbecher A, Braun J, Paris S, Biedermann T, Hamm B, Bollow M (2000) MR imaging of septic sacroiliitis. Skelet Radiol 29:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klein MA, Winalski CS, Wax MR et al (1991) MR imaging of septic sacroiliitis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bakker PA, van den Berg R, Lenczner G (2017) Can we use structural lesions seen on MRI of the sacroiliac joints reliably for the classification of patients according to the ASAS axial spondyloarthritis criteria? Data from the DESIR cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 76(2):392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Khan MA et al (2004) How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early. Ann Rheum Dis 63:535–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bakker PA, van den Berg R, Hooge M (2018) Impact of replacing radiographic sacroiliitis by magnetic resonance imaging structural lesions on the classification of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxf).  https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex532 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim NH, Lee HM, Suh JS (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of tuberculous spondylitis. Spine 19(21):2451–2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gong Y, Zheng N, Chen SB et al (2012) Ten years’ experience with needle biopsy in the early diagnosis of sacroiliitis. Arthritis Rheum 64(5):1399–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marzo-Ortega H, O’Connor P, Emery P et al (2007) Sacroiliac joint biopsies in early scaroiliitis. Rheumatology (Oxf) 46(7):1210–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knipp D, Simeone FJ, Nelson SB et al (2018) Percutaneous CT-guided sacroiliac joint sampling for infection: aspiration, biopsy, and technique. Skelet Radiol 47(4):473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pouchot J, Vinceneux P, Barge J et al (1988) Tuberculosis of the sacroiliac joint: clinical features, outcome and evaluation of closed needle biopsy in 11 consecutive cases. Am J Med 84:622–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kang Y, Hong SH, Kim JY et al (2015) Unilateral sacroiliitis: Differential diagnosis between infectious sacroiliitis and spondyloarthritis based on MRI findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205(5):1048–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aydingoz U, Yildiz AE, Ozdemir ZM et al (2012) A critical overview of the imaging arm of the ASAS criteria for diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis: what the radiologist should know. Diagn Interv Radiol (Ank) 18:555–565Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rishi Mugesh Kanna
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aju Bosco
    • 1
  • Ajoy Prasad Shetty
    • 1
  • S. Rajasekaran
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Spine SurgeryGanga HospitalCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations