European Spine Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 882–890 | Cite as

Surgical complications of extraspinal tumors in the cervical spine: a report of 110 cases and literature review

  • WenHua Yang
  • Liang Jiang
  • XiaoGuang Liu
  • Feng Wei
  • Miao Yu
  • FengLiang Wu
  • Lei Dang
  • Hua Zhou
  • Hua Zhang
  • ZhongJun Liu
Original Article
  • 176 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the safety of surgical intervention for extraspinal tumors in the cervical spine.

Methods

110 consecutive patients were enrolled and followed-up at least 12 months or until death. The complication rates and risk factors were documented and analyzed.

Results

The quality of life in the surviving patients was significantly improved. The overall local recurrence rate was 17.3%. Twenty percent of patients developed distant metastasis. The perioperative mortality rate (30 days after surgery) was 0.9%. The complication related mortality was 1.8%. The rates of overall complication and major complication were 41.8% and 20.9%, respectively. The independent predictors for overall complications were Karnofsky score <60, multisegmental resection, and operation time >3 h. The independent predictors of major complications were comorbidity, tumor location at C1–C2, and combined approach.

Conclusions

Surgery for cervical spine tumor could improve the quality of life, though it might be accompanied with high morbidity and mortality. It is a highly demanding procedure; however, it can be performed to an acceptable degree of safety.

Keywords

Spine tumor Cervical Surgery Complication Mortality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms ChenMei Ren for collecting the data.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Source of funding

The work described here was supported by the Research Grant of Peking University Third Hospital (No. Y71508-01).

Supplementary material

586_2017_5259_MOESM1_ESM.docx (56 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 55 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Boriani S, Gasbarrini A, Bandiera S et al (2016) Predictors for surgical complications of en bloc resections in the spine: review of 220 cases treated by the same team. Eur Spine J 25:3932–3941. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4463-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Imajo Y, Taguchi T, Yone K et al (2015) Japanese 2011 nationwide survey on complications from spine surgery. J Orthop Sci 20:38–54. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0656-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zileli M, Kilinçer C, Ersahin Y, Çagli S (2007) Primary tumors of the cervical spine: a retrospective review of 35 surgically managed cases. Spine J 7:165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibrahim A, Crockard A, Antonietti P et al (2008) Does spinal surgery improve the quality of life for those with extradural (spinal) osseous metastases? An international multicenter prospective observational study of 223 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 8:271–278. doi: 10.3171/SPI/2008/8/3/271 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Placantonakis DG, Laufer I, Wang JC et al (2008) Posterior stabilization strategies following resection of cervicothoracic junction tumors: review of 90 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Spine 9:111–119. doi: 10.3171/SPI/2008/9/8/111 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choi D, Melcher R, Harms J, Crockard A (2010) Outcome of 132 operations in 97 patients with chordomas of the craniocervical junction and upper cervical spine. Neurosurgery 66:59–65. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000362000.35742.3D CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arrigo RT, Kalanithi P, Cheng I et al (2011) Predictors of survival after surgical treatment of spinal metastasis. Neurosurgery 68:674–681. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318207780c CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Denaro V, Di Martino A, Papalia R, Denaro L (2011) Patients with cervical metastasis and neoplastic pachymeningitis are less likely to improve neurologically after surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:708–714. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1617-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim CH, Chung CK, Jahng T-A, Kim HJ (2011) Resumption of ambulatory status after surgery for nonambulatory patients with epidural spinal metastasis. Spine J 11:1015–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aizenberg MR, Fox BD, Suki D et al (2012) Surgical management of unknown primary tumors metastatic to the spine. J Neurosurg Spine 16:86–92. doi: 10.3171/2011.9.SPINE11422 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cho W, Chang U-K (2012) Neurological and survival outcomes after surgical management of subaxial cervical spine metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E969–E977. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824ee1c2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yasuda M, Bresson D, Chibbaro S et al (2012) Chordomas of the skull base and cervical spine: clinical outcomes associated with a multimodal surgical resection combined with proton-beam radiation in 40 patients. Neurosurg Rev 35:171–183. doi: 10.1007/s10143-011-0334-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liang T, Wan Y, Zou X et al (2013) Is surgery for spine metastasis reasonable in patients older than 60 years? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:628–639. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2699-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amendola L, Cappuccio M, De Iure F et al (2014) En bloc resections for primary spinal tumors in 20 years of experience: effectiveness and safety. Spine J 14:2608–2617. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Ruiter GCW, Lobatto DJ, Wolfs JF et al (2014) Reconstruction with expandable cages after single- and multilevel corpectomies for spinal metastases: a prospective case series of 60 patients. Spine J 14:2085–2093. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee BH, Park J-O, Kim H-S et al (2014) Perioperative complication and surgical outcome in patients with spine metastases: retrospective 200-case series in a single institute. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 122:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.04.025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tatsui CE, Suki D, Rao G et al (2014) Factors affecting survival in 267 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. J Neurosurg Spine 20:108–116. doi: 10.3171/2013.9.SPINE13158 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quraishi NA, Arealis G, Salem KMI et al (2015) The surgical management of metastatic spinal tumors based on an Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (ESCC) scale. Spine J 15:1738–1743. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.040 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vanek P, Bradac O, Trebicky F et al (2015) Influence of the preoperative neurological status on survival after the surgical treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases with spinal cord compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:1824–1830. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001141 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yadla S, Malone J, Campbell PG et al (2011) Incidence of early complications in cervical spine surgery and relation to preoperative diagnosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:50–54. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181d0d0e8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McDonnell MF, Glassman SD, Dimar JR et al (1996) Perioperative complications of anterior procedures on the spine. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78:839–847. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199701000-00052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cywinski JB, Xu M, Sessler DI et al (2009) Predictors of prolonged postoperative endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung resection. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 23:766–769. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.03.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Boriani S, Weinstein JN, Biagini R (1997) Primary bone tumors of the spine. Terminology and surgical staging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:1036–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bickenbach KA, Gonen M, Labow DM et al (2013) Indications for and efficacy of splenectomy for haematological disorders. Br J Surg 100:794–800. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9067 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boriani S, Bandiera S, Donthineni R et al (2010) Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine. Eur Spine J 19:231–241. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1137-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lau D, Leach MR, Than KD et al (2013) Independent predictors of complication following surgery for spinal metastasis. Eur Spine J 22:1402–1407. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2706-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arrigo RT, Kalanithi P, Cheng I et al (2011) Charlson score is a robust predictor of 30-day complications following spinal metastasis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E1274–E1280. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318206cda3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mueller AR, Platz K-P, Kremer B (2004) Early postoperative complications following liver transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:881–900. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2004.07.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Molinari R, Bessette M, Raich A et al (2014) Vertebral artery anomaly and injury in spinal surgery. Evid Based Spine Care J 5:016–027. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366980 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lunardini DJ, Eskander MS, Even JL et al (2014) Vertebral artery injuries in cervical spine surgery. Spine J 14:1520–1525. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopaedic DepartmentPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
  2. 2.Emergency Department, Beijing Shijitan HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Research Center of Clinical EpidemiologyPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations