European Spine Journal

, Volume 16, Issue 11, pp 1867–1874 | Cite as

Kinematics of the lumbar spine in trunk rotation: in vivo three-dimensional analysis using magnetic resonance imaging

  • Ryutaro FujiiEmail author
  • Hironobu Sakaura
  • Yoshihiro Mukai
  • Noboru Hosono
  • Takahiro Ishii
  • Motoki Iwasaki
  • Hideki Yoshikawa
  • Kazuomi Sugamoto
Original Article


In vivo three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of the lumbar spine has not been well evaluated by the conventional methods because of their methodological limitations, while 3D intervertebral motions have been quantitatively determined by cadaver studies. We thus developed a novel 3D analyzing system for the relative motions of individual vertebrae using 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and analyzed in vivo 3D intervertebral motions of the lumbar spine during trunk rotation. Ten healthy volunteers underwent 3D MRI of the lumbar spine in nine positions with 15° increments during trunk rotation (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and maximum). Relative motions of the lumbar spine were calculated by automatically superimposing a segmented 3D MRI of the vertebra in the neutral position over images of each position using the voxel-based registration method. These 3D motions were represented with 6 degrees of freedom by Euler angles and translations on the coordinate system. The mean axial rotation of ten healthy volunteers of each lumbar spinal segment in 45° trunk rotation to each side ranged from 1.2° to 1.7°. Coupled flexion with axial rotation was observed at the segments from L1/2 to L5/S1. Coupled lateral bending of the segments from L1/2 to L4/5 was in the opposite direction of the trunk rotation, while that of T12/L1 and L5/S1 was in the same direction. The direction of the coupled lateral bending in the present study was different from that in the previous cadaver study only at L4/5. This difference might result from the non-load state of the supine position in the current study and/or the non-physiological state in the cadaver study. Our system has two limitations: (1) the study was conducted with each volunteer in the supine position, and (2) because the rotation device regulated trunk rotation, trunk rotation might not have been physiological. In vivo 3D intervertebral motions of the lumbar spine during trunk rotation were evaluated using our novel motion analysis system. These data may be useful for the optimal orthopaedic management of lumbar spinal disorders.


Kinematics Coupled motion Lumbar spine Volume registration 



The authors wish to thank Mr. Ryoji Nakao for assisting with programming computer software, Mr. Mitsuhiro Shiotani and Mr. Daisuke Oka for help in producing MRI, and Mr. Sadayuki Miyatani for assistance in producing the device for motion analysis.

Supplementary material

(MPG 3.46 Mb)


  1. 1.
    Goto A, Moritomo H, Murase T, Oka K, Sugamoto K, Arimura T, Masumoto J, Tamura S, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T (2005) In vivo three-dimensional wrist motion analysis using magnetic resonance imaging and volume-based registration. J Orthop Res 23(4):750–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ishii T, Mukai Y, Hosono N, Sakaura H, Nakajima Y, Sato Y, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H (2004) Kinematics of the upper cervical spine in rotation: in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Spine 29(7):E139–E144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ishii T, Mukai Y, Hosono N, Sakaura H, Fujii R, Nakajima Y, Tamura S, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H (2004) Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Spine 29(24):2826–2831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ishii T, Mukai Y, Hosono N, Sakaura H, Fujii R, Nakajima Y, Tamura S, Iwasaki M, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K (2006) Kinematics of the cervical spine in lateral bending: in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Spine 31(2):155–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee RY (2001) Kinematics of rotational mobilisation of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 16(6):481–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lorensen W, Cline H (1987) Marching cubes: a high-resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Comput Graph 21:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lovett RW (1905) The mechanism of the normal spine and its relation to scoliosis. Boston Med Surg J 13:349–358Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McGregor AH, Anderton L, Gedroyc WM, Johnson J, Hughes SP (2001) Assessment of spinal kinematics using open interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res (392):341–348Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGregor AH, Anderton L, Gedroyc WM, Johnson J, Hughes SP (2002) The use of interventional open MRI to assess the kinematics of the lumbar spine in patients with spondylolisthesis. Spine 27(14):1582–1586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panjabi M, Yamamoto I, Oxland T, Crisco J (1989) How does posture affect coupling in the lumbar spine? Spine 14(9):1002–1011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Yamamoto I, Crisco JJ (1994) Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(3):413–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pearcy MJ, Tibrewal SB (1984) Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine 9(6):582–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takayanagi K, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Moriya H, Kitahara H, Tamaki T (2001) Using cineradiography for continuous dynamic-motion analysis of the lumbar spine. Spine 26(17):1858–1865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Herp G, Rowe P, Salter P, Paul JP (2000) Three-dimensional lumbar spinal kinematics: a study of range of movement in 100 healthy subjects aged 20 to 60+ years. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39(12):1337–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edn. JB Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamamoto I, Panjabi MM, Crisco T, Oxland T (1989) Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine 14(11):1256–1260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryutaro Fujii
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hironobu Sakaura
    • 1
  • Yoshihiro Mukai
    • 2
  • Noboru Hosono
    • 3
  • Takahiro Ishii
    • 4
  • Motoki Iwasaki
    • 1
  • Hideki Yoshikawa
    • 1
  • Kazuomi Sugamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Orthopaedic SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineSuitaJapan
  2. 2.Orthopaedic SurgerySumitomo HospitalOsakaJapan
  3. 3.Orthopaedic SurgeryOsaka Kouseinenkin HospitalOsakaJapan
  4. 4.Orthopaedic SurgeryHoshigaoka Kouseinenkin HosupitalHirakataJapan

Personalised recommendations