The effect of tramadol and meloxicam, alone and in combination on oxidative stress status in dogs
- 53 Downloads
Management of pain by different therapeutic agents has always been one of the most important components in clinical veterinary care. Concerns about various side effects of analgesics drugs have lead the pain relief to combination drug therapy. The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of combined tramadol and meloxicam on oxidative stress status in dogs. Twenty clinically healthy dogs were randomly divided into four groups and administered with placebo, tramadol, meloxicam, and combined meloxicam with tramadol for 10 days. The antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase (CAT), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and malondialdehyde (MDA) were assayed in blood samples which were collected in days 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20. In dogs administrated with tramadol, the antioxidant enzymes and TAC were significantly decreased and MDA level was significantly increased. However, meloxicam group showed no alteration in the levels of GPx, CAT, TAC, and MDA. Moreover, administration of meloxicam with tramadol improved oxidative stress status through inhibiting lipid peroxidation, increasing antioxidant enzymes, and TAC. These results indicate that meloxicam is effective in reducing oxidative stress induced by tramadol. Therefore, combination of tramadol and meloxicam is desired due to their potential analgesic result and ameliorating effect on oxidative stress status.
KeywordsTramadol Meloxicam Oxidative stress Dog
This study is financially and technically supported by the Research Council of Shiraz University and School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University (Grant No. 71-GR-VT-5).
Compliance with ethical standards
The experiment was performed under the approval of the state committee on animal ethics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran (IACUC no: 4687/63). Also, the recommendations of European Council Directive (86/609/EC) of November 24, 1986, regarding the protection of animals used for experimental purposes were considered.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Flecknell PA, Waterman-Pearson A (2000) Pain management in animals. WB SaundersGoogle Scholar
- Khan AM, Rampal S (2014) Effects of repeated oral administration of pazufloxacin mesylate and meloxicam on the antioxidant status in rabbits. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 53:399–403Google Scholar
- Lin CS, Liu CY, Sun YL, Chang LC, Chiu YT, Huang SY, Lin JH, Yang PC, Chu R, Huang M (1997) Alteration of endogenous antioxidant enzymes in naturally occurring hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Biochem Mol Biol Int 43:1253–1263Google Scholar
- Mathews KA (1996) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics in pain management in dogs and cats. Can Vet J 37:539–545Google Scholar
- Nikvsarkar M, Banerjee A, Shah D, Trivedi J, Patel M, Cherian B, Padh H (2006) Reduction in aluminum induced oxidative stress by meloxicam in rat brain. Iran Biomed J 10:151–155Google Scholar
- Ortiz MI, MolIna MAR, Arai Y, Romano CL (2012) Analgesic drugs combinations in the treatment of different types of pain. Pain Res Treat 2012:612519Google Scholar
- Raffa RB, Friderichs E, Reimann W, Shank RP, Codd EE, Vaught JL (1992) Opioid and nonopioid components independently contribute to the mechanism of action of tramadol, an ‘atypical’ opioid analgesic. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 260:275–285Google Scholar
- Ramsey I (2008) BSAVA Small Animal Formulary, 7th Revised edn. British Small Animal Veterinary Association Publication, GloucesterGoogle Scholar
- Tallarida RJ (2001) Drug synergism: its detection and applications. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298:865–872Google Scholar
- Taylor P (2003) Pain management in dogs and cats–more causes and locations to contemplate. WB SaundersGoogle Scholar
- Teixeira RC, Monteiro ER, Campagnol D, Coelho K, Bressan TF, Monteiro BS (2013) Effects of tramadol alone, in combination with meloxicam or dipyrone, on postoperative pain and the analgesic requirement in dogs undergoing unilateral mastectomy with or without ovariohysterectomy. Vet Anaesth Analg 40:641–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar