Comparative Clinical Pathology

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 517–523 | Cite as

Cross-sectional sero-prevalence of tularemia among murine rodents of Nepal

  • Narayan AcharyaEmail author
  • Krishna Prasad Acharya
  • Ishwari Prasad Dhakal
Original Article


In April of 2015, a massive earthquake and hundreds of aftershocks stroked entire country. Geophysical disasters not only create economic crisis but also cause changes in disease ecology. Tularemia is a zoonotic disease with range of pathogenicity in different animal species. This study was designed to identify the disease status of tularemia in different species of murine rodents of Chitwan District of Nepal. Once the rodents were recovered from metal traps, they were euthanized by injectable anesthesia overdose followed by cervical dislocation. Blood was collected from the heart, and serum was isolated. Presence of tularemia antibodies in the serum was tested by using immunochromatographic test kit containing bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Of the total 80 serum samples tested, 1 sample was found tularemia positive, i.e., apparent prevalence 1.25% (95% CI, i.e., normal approx. CL, − 1.18 to 3.68%) and the true prevalence 0.5024% (95% CI, i.e., Blacker CL, 0 to 5.45%). Likewise, 23.75% (95% CI, i.e., normal approx. CL, 14.42 to 33.08%) of the animals were found with a few to numerous whitish/grayish or yellowish foci and 13.75% (95% CI, i.e., normal approx. CL, 6.2 to 21.3%) of animals with cystic lesions in their liver parenchyma. The location’s prevalence was 3.70% for Bharatpur, while nil for the rest of the areas and the difference was statistically insignificant (*P > 0.05). This evidence of existence of Francisella tularensis in Nepal is expected to evoke public interest at different levels. Food and commodities contaminated with secretions and excretions of rats and mice are strongly suggested to avoid as a safety measure to rodents born infectious diseases.


Tularemia Nepal Rodent diseases Prevalence 



Special thanks to Dr. Yuvraj Panth, Dr. Dipendra Kandel, Dr. Bishnuhari Sharma, and Dr. Manoj Lamichhane for their kind support in survey and rodent collection, and also, our strong gratitude to staffs of Biotechnology Center, Department of Microbiology and Department of Veterinary Medicine of Agriculture and Forestry University of Nepal who were with us at every point of this study. Finally, we would like to thank all the participating locals who wholeheartedly supported to capture rodents at their premises and nearby areas.

Authors’ contributions

NA and IPD conceived and designed the study. NA and KPA carried out sampling and laboratory analysis. NA and KPA drafted the manuscript and carried out statistical analysis, while IPD analyzed and interpreted the data. All the authors of this manuscript have perused and agreed for its final approval.

Funding information

Financial support for this study was received from Asia Network for Sustainable Agriculture and Bioresources (ANSAB).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All essential institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.


  1. Christova I, Gladnishka T (2005) Prevalence of infection with Francisella tularensis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in rodents from an endemic focus of tularemia in Bulgaria. Ann Agric Environ Med 12:149–152Google Scholar
  2. Dell RB, Holleran S, Ramakrishnan R (2002) Sample size determination. ILAR J 43:207–213. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dhungel DN, Pun SB, Shrestha N (2009) Chapter 3. In: The Nepal – India Water Relationship: Challenges. pp. 69–98.Google Scholar
  4. Ekanayake S, Warnasuriya ND, Samarakoon PS et al (1999) An unusual “infection” of a child in Sri Lanka, with Taenia taeniaeformis of the cat. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 93:869–873. Google Scholar
  5. Elashvili E, Kracalik I, Burjanadze I et al (2015) Environmental monitoring and surveillance of rodents and vectors for francisella tularensis following outbreaks of human tularemia in Georgia. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis 15:633–636. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. El-Etr SH, Margolis JJ, Monack D et al (2009) Francisella tularensis type A strains cause the rapid encystment of Acanthamoeba castellanii and survive in amoebal cysts for three weeks postinfection. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7488–7500. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Friend M (2006) Tularemia, Circular. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, p 1Google Scholar
  8. Gürcan Ş (2014) Epidemiology of tularemia. Balkan Med J 31:3–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gyuranecz M, Szeredi L, Makrai L et al (2010) Tularemia of European Brown Hare (Lepus europaeus). Vet Pathol 47:958–963. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gyuranecz M, Rigó K, Dán Á et al (2011) Investigation of the ecology of Francisella tularensis during an inter-epizootic period. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis 11:1031–1035. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. He J, Innis BL, Shrestha MP et al (2002) Evidence that rodents are a reservoir of hepatitis E virus for humans in Nepal. J Clin Microbiol 40:4493–4498. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Javed M (2016) Molecular and serological characterization of soilborne Francisella tularensis. University of veterinary and animal sciences, LahoreGoogle Scholar
  13. Jnawali SR, Baral HS, Lee S et al (2011) The Status of Nepal’ s Mammals: The National Red List Series. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  14. Karadenizli A, Forsman M, Şimşek H et al (2015) Genomic analyses of Francisella tularensis strains confirm disease transmission from drinking water sources, Turkey, 2008, 2009 and 2012. Eurosurveillance 20:1–5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keim P, Johansson A, Wagner DM (2007) Molecular epidemiology, evolution, and ecology of francisella. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1105:30–66. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kemp C (2001) Bioterrorism: introduction and major agents. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 13:483–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kılıç S (2010) A general overview of francisella tularensis and the epidemiology of Tularemia in Turkey. FLORA 15:37–58Google Scholar
  18. Kouadio IK, Aljunid S, Kamigaki T et al (2012) Infectious diseases following natural disasters: prevention and control measures. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 10:95–104. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindhusen Lindhé E, Hjertqvist M, Wahab T (2018) Outbreak of tularaemia connected to a contaminated well in the Västra Götaland region in Sweden. Zoonoses Public Health 65:142–146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu Y, Yu Y, Feng L et al (2016) Phylogeography of Francisella tularensis from Tibet, China: evidence for an asian origin and radiation of holarctica-type Tularemia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 7:865–868. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MoAD (2012) Statistical information on nepalese agriculture. Singhadurbar, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
  22. Mörner T (1992) The ecology of tularaemia. Rev Sci Tech 11:1123–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mostafavi E, Shahraki AH, Japoni-Nejad A et al (2017) A field study of plague and Tularemia in Rodents, Western Iran. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 17:247–253. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. OIE (2008) Tularemia. In: OIE Terrestrial Manual. pp. 361–366.Google Scholar
  25. Olsufiev NG, Emelynova OS, Dunayeva TN (1959) Comparative study of strains of B. tularense in the old and new world and their taxonomy. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 3:138–149Google Scholar
  26. Pourhossein B, Esmaeili S, Gyuranecz M, Mostafavi E (2015) Tularemia and plague survey in rodents in an earthquake zone in southeastern Iran. Epidemiol Heal 37:e2015050. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roth TM, Foley J, Wright S (2017) Abiotic and biotic contributors to support inter-epidemic Francisella tularensis in an agricultural peri-urban environment. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis 17:vbz.2017.2148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scheel O, Sandvik T, Hoel T, Aasen S (1992) Tularemia in Norway. A clinical and epidemiological review. TidsskrNor Laegeforen 112:635–637Google Scholar
  29. Schulze C, Heuner K, Myrtennäs K et al (2016) High and novel genetic diversity of Francisella tularensis in Germany and indication of environmental persistence. Epidemiol Infect 144:1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shabbir MZ, Jamil T, Ali AA et al (2015) Prevalence and distribution of soil-borne zoonotic pathogens in Lahore district of Pakistan. Front Microbiol 6:917. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharma N, Hotta A, Yamamoto Y et al (2014) Serosurveillance for Francisella tularensis among wild animals in japan using a newly developed competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 14:234–239. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sharma R, Tiwari K, Birmingham K et al (2017) Cysticercus fasciolaris in brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) in Grenada, West Indies. J Parasitol Res 2017:1723406. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singla LD, Singla N, Parshad VR et al (2008) Rodents as reservoirs of parasites in India. Integr Zool 3:21–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sjöstedt A (2007) Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology, and clinical manifestations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1105:1–29. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang Y, Peng Y, Hai R et al (2014) Diversity of francisella tularensis subsp. Holarctica Lineages, China. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1191–1194. Google Scholar
  36. Zhang F, Liu W, Chu MC et al (2006) Francisella tularensis in Rodents, China. Emerg Infect Dis 12:994–996. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas Tech University, Institute of Environmental and Human HealthLubbockUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Public HealthAgriculture and Forestry UniversityRampurNepal
  3. 3.Ministry of Livestock DevelopmentKathmanduNepal

Personalised recommendations