Advertisement

Rationality of an \(S_6\)-Invariant Quartic 3-Fold

  • Ilya KarzhemanovEmail author
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

We complete the study of rationality problem for hypersurfaces \(X_t\subset \mathbb {P}^4\) of degree 4 invariant under the action of the symmetric group \(S_6\).

Keywords

Quartic 3-fold Ordinary double point Rationality 

Mathematics Subject Classification

14E08 14E30 14M10 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Some parts of the paper were prepared during my visits to AG Laboratory at HSE (Moscow) and Miami University (US). I am grateful to these Institutions and people there for hospitality. Also thanks to anonymous referee for valuable comments. The work was supported by World Premier International Research Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan, by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (26887009) from Japan Mathematical Society (Kakenhi), and by the Russian Academic Excellence Project 5-100.

References

  1. Beauville, A.: Non-rationality of the \(S_6\)-symmetric quartic threefolds. Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino 71(3–4), 385–388 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogomolov, F., Karzhemanov, I., Kuyumzhiyan, K.: Unirationality and existence of infinitely transitive models. In: Bogomolov, F., Brendan, H., Tschinkel, Y. (eds.) Birational Geometry, Rational Curves, and Arithmetic. Simons Symposia. Springer, New York, pp. 77–92 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. Cheltsov, I., Przhiyalkovski, V., Shramov, C.: Hyperelliptic and trigonal Fano threefolds. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 69(2), 145–204 (2005). translation in Izv. Math. 69 (2005), no. 2, 365 – 421MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheltsov, I., Shramov, C.: Five embeddings of one simple group. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 366(3), 1289–1331 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cutkosky, S.: Elementary contractions of Gorenstein threefolds. Math. Ann. 280(3), 521–525 (1988)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Cynk, S.: Defect of a nodal hypersurface. Manuscr. Math. 104(3), 325–331 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Dolgachev, I.V.: Classical Algebraic Geometry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. de Fernex, T., Fusi, D.: Rationality in families of threefolds. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) 62(1), 127–135 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Graber, T., Harris, J., Starr, J.: Families of rationally connected varieties. J. Am. Math. Soc. 16(1), 57–67 (2003). (electronic)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunt, B.: The Geometry of Some Special Arithmetic Quotients. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1637. Springer, Berlin (1996)Google Scholar
  11. Iskovskikh, V.A., Prokhorov, Y.G.: Fano varieties. In: Algebraic geometry, V, Encyclopaedia Math. Sci., 47. Springer, Berlin, pp. 1–247 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. Jahnke, P., Radloff, I.: Gorenstein Fano threefolds with base points in the anticanonical system. Compos. Math. 142(2), 422–432 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Jahnke, P., Radloff, I.: Terminal Fano threefolds and their smoothings. Math. Z. 269(3–4), 1129–1136 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaloghiros, A.-S.: A classification of terminal quartic 3-folds and applications to rationality questions. Math. Ann. 354(1), 263–296 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Kawamata, Y.: Crepant blowing-up of \(3\)-dimensional canonical singularities and its application to degenerations of surfaces. Ann. Math. (2) 127(1), 93–163 (1988)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kollár, J.: Grothendieck-Lefschetz type theorems for the local Picard group. J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 28A, 267–285 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Kollár, J., Mori, S.: Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, Translated from the 1998 Japanese Original, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 134. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  18. Lazarsfeld, R.: Positivity in Algebraic Geometry. I, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, vol. 48, Springer, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar
  19. Manin, Y.I.: Cubic Forms: Algebra, Geometry, Arithmetic, Translated from the Russian by M. Hazewinkel, North-Holland Amsterdam (1974)Google Scholar
  20. Namikawa, Y.: Smoothing Fano \(3\)-folds. J. Algebraic Geom. 6(2), 307–324 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Prokhorov, Y. G.: Fields of invariants of finite linear groups. In: Cohomological and Geometric Approaches to Rationality Problems, Progr. Math., 282, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, pp. 245–273 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. Prokhorov, YuG: Simple finite subgroups of the Cremona group of rank 3. J. Algebraic Geom. 21(3), 563–600 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Prokhorov, YuG: The degree of Fano threefolds with canonical Gorenstein singularities. Mat. Sb. 196(1), 81–122 (2005). translation in Sb. Math. 196 (2005), no. 1-2, 77 – 114MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Prokhorov, YuG, Shokurov, V.V.: Towards the second main theorem on complements. J. Algebraic Geom. 18(1), 151–199 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Shokurov, V.V.: Three-dimensional log perestroikas. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 56(1), 105–203 (1992). translation in Russian Acad. Sci. Izv. Math. 40 (1993), no. 1, 95 – 202MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyInstitutskij pereulokDolgoprudnyiRussia

Personalised recommendations