Advertisement

Mycorrhiza

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 435–443 | Cite as

Archaeospora ecuadoriana sp. nov. from a mountainous biodiversity hotspot area in Ecuador, and transfer of Palaeospora spainiae to Archaeospora, as A. spainiae comb. nov.

  • Arthur SchüßlerEmail author
  • Christopher Walker
Original Article

Abstract

A new glomeromycotan fungus, Archaeospora ecuadoriana sp. nov., was found in the south Ecuadorian mountain rainforest region, a global plant biodiversity hotspot. It was cultivated as single spore isolate originating from nursery-grown native tree seedlings inoculated with mixed soil from pristine forest and agricultural fields. The new species is known from the Loja area, southern Ecuador, at about 2100 m above mean sea level (mamsl) and has been detected in potato roots from an Andean region in Peru at 2658 mamsl by previous molecular data. The fungus forms small, colourless to frosted white, mainly globose spores, averaging 61 × 60 μm, formed singly or very rarely in clusters. There is no reaction to Melzer’s reagent, other than a slight unspecific overall yellow iodine staining. The spores are very similar to those of Archaeospora trappei and A. schenckii. However, molecular phylogenetic analysis shows the species to be clearly separate from all other described Archaeospora species. The analysis of the available Archaeospora sequence data shows that sequences of Palaeospora spainiae, of the monospecific genus Palaeospora, cluster within the genus Archaeospora. Palaeospora therefore is synonymised with Archaeospora and P. spainiae is transferred to Archaeospora, as A. spainiae comb. nov.

Keywords

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi DNA barcode Ecuador Archaeospora ecuadoriana Archaeospora spainiae Species description 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Claudia Krüger for conducting the PCR and cloning of the DNA and some of the cultivation work.

Funding information

The German Research Foundation (DFG) funded part of this study in the frame of the Research Unit 816, Project SCHU 1203/10.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Arthur Schüßler and Christopher Walker. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Arthur Schüßler and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Bills RJ (2015) Phylogenetic relationships among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species in the deeply rooted Archaeosporales (Glomeromycota). West Virginia University, Morgantown, DissertationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brummitt N, Lughadha E (2003) Biodiversity: where’s hot and where’s not. Conserv Biol 17:1442–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dalpé Y, Declerck S (2002) Development of Acaulospora rehmii spore and hyphal swellings under root-organ culture. Mycologia 94:850–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fracchia S, Scervino J, Menéndez A, Godeas A (2003) Isolation, culture and host colonization of Entrophospora schenckii (Glomales), an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Nova Hedwigia 77:383–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gerdemann JW, Trappe JM (1974) The Endogonaceae in the Pacific Northwest. Mycol Mem No 5:1–76Google Scholar
  6. Jørgensen PM, León-Yánez S (1999) Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador. Monogr Syst Bot Missouri Bot Gard 75:1–1182Google Scholar
  7. Kramadibrata K, Walker C, Schwarzott D, Schüßler A (2000) A new species of Scutellospora with a coiled germination shield. Ann Bot 86:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krüger M, Stockinger H, Krüger C, Schüßler A (2009) DNA-based species level detection of Glomeromycota: one PCR primer set for all arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 183:212–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the gateway computing environments workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  10. Morton JB (1990) Evolutionary relationships among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the Endogonaceae. Mycologia 82:192–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morton JB, Redecker D (2001) Two new families of Glomales, Archaeosporaceae and Paraglomaceae, with two new genera Archaeospora and Paraglomus, based on concordant molecular and morphological characters. Mycologia 93:181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oehl F, Sieverding E, Palenzuela J, Ineichen K, da Silva GA (2011) Advances in Glomeromycota taxonomy and classification. IMA Fungus 2:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oehl F, Sánchez-Castro I, Palenzuela J, da Silva GA (2015) Palaeospora spainii, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus from Swiss agricultural soils. Nova Hedwigia 101:89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schenck NC, Spain JL, Sieverding E (1986) A new sporocarpic species of Acaulospora (Endogonaceae). Mycotaxon 25:111–117Google Scholar
  15. Schüßler A, Walker C (2010) The Glomeromycota. A species list with new families and new genera. Schüßler A, Walker C, Gloucester. Published in December 2010 in libraries at The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, The Royal Botanic Garden Kew, Botanische Staatssammlung Munich, and Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Schüßler A, Krüger C, Urgiles N (2016) Phylogenetically diverse AM fungi from Ecuador strongly improve seedling growth of native potential crop trees. Mycorrhiza 26:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schwarzott D, Schüßler A (2001) A simple and reliable method for SSU rRNA gene DNA extraction, amplification, and cloning from single AM fungal spores. Mycorrhiza 10:203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Senés-Guerrero C, Schüßler A (2016) A conserved arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal core-species community colonizes potato roots in the Andes. Fungal Divers 77:317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Senés-Guerrero C, Torres-Cortés G, Pfeiffer S, Rojas M, Schüßler A (2014) Potato-associated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in the Peruvian Andes. Mycorrhiza 24:405–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sieverding E, Oehl F (2006) Revision of Entrophospora and description of Kuklospora and Intraspora, two new genera in the arbuscular mycorrhizal Glomeromycetes. J Appl Bot Food Qual 80:69–81Google Scholar
  21. Sieverding E, Toro ST (1987) Entrophospora schenckii: a new species in the Endogonaceae from Colombia. Mycotaxon 28:209–214Google Scholar
  22. Spain JL (2003) Emendation of Archaeospora and of its type species, Archaeospora trappei. Mycotaxon 87:109–112Google Scholar
  23. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stockinger H, Krüger M, Schüßler A (2010) DNA barcoding of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 187:461–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor A, Walker C, Bending GD (2014) Dimorphic spore production in the genus Acaulospora. Mycoscience 55:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Urgiles N, Loján P, Aguirre N, Blaschke H, Günter S, Stimm B, Kottke I (2009) Application of mycorrhizal roots improves growth of tropical tree seedlings in the nursery: a step towards reforestation with native species in the Andes of Ecuador. New Forest 38:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walker C (1983) Taxonomic concepts in the Endogonaceae: spore wall characteristics in species descriptions. Mycotaxon 18:443–455Google Scholar
  28. Walker C, Trappe JM (1993) Names and epithets in the Glomales and Endogonales. Mycol Res 97:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Genetics, Department BiologyLudwig-Maximilians-University MunichMartinsriedGermany
  2. 2.SYMPLANTA GmbH und Co. KGDarmstadtGermany
  3. 3.Royal Botanic Garden EdinburghEdinburghUK
  4. 4.School of Agriculture and EnvironmentUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations