Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Superior performance area changing capacitive MEMS accelerometer employing additional lateral springs for low frequency applications


This paper introduces an effective and efficient microstructure of a differential area changing capacitive accelerometer to ensure low cross-axis sensitivity, high linearity and low noise figure for low frequency applications like Structural Health Monitoring and seismic sensing. The major design concern in an area dependent capacitance structure is that even small magnitude of cross axis displacement can drastically affect the sensitivity and linearity. The authors first focused their effort to obtain the guidelines for the best performance in the conventional structure of area changing capacitive sensors. The results clearly demonstrated that the existing structures used conventionally cannot meet the stringent requirements for low frequency applications. Subsequently, the various studies on the new structure proposed in this work were presented and the results are compared with latest reports for benchmarking. It has been estimated that the new structure can give cross-axis displacement as low as 0.5%, linearity of 2.53% and noise figure of 4.89 ng/\(\sqrt {\text{Hz}}\), the best achieved in so for. These studies clearly demonstrate that the ill effects of parasitic capacitance on voltage sensitivity and linearity can be suppressed by the new design. These results further show that the area changing capacitive structure employing additional lateral springs is a promising candidate for low frequency applications like seismography. The other major advantage of this structure is that the fabrication process flow need not be changed in the production line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27


  1. Aktan AE, Catbas FN (2003) Development of a model health monitoring guide for major bridges. In: Federal highway administration research and development, Drexel intelligent infrastructure and transportation safety institute

  2. Amini BV, Ayazi F (2005) Micro-gravity capacitive silicon-on-insulator accelerometers. J Micromech Microeng 15:2113–2120

  3. Analog, ADXL356B, Datasheet. https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/ADXL356-357.pdf

  4. Bais B, Majlis BY (2005) Mechanical sensitivity enhancement of an area changed capacitive accelerometer by optimization of the device geometry. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 44:175–183

  5. Bais B, Majlis BY (2008) Low-g area-changed MEMS accelerometer using bulk silicon technique. Am J Appl Sci 5(6):626–632

  6. Bais B, Ahanchian A, Burhanuddin YM (2005) A low-g bulk micromachined silicon accelerometer with area changed differential capacitance smart sensors, actuators, and MEMS, SPIE, vol 5836

  7. Benmessaoud M, Nasreddine MM (2013) Optimization of MEMS capacitive accelerometer. Microsyst Technol 19:713–720

  8. Chuang W-C et al (2012) The fringe capacitance formula of microstructures. J Micromech Microeng 22:025015

  9. Colibrys, MS9010, Datasheet. https://www.colibrys.com/product/ms9000-mems-accelerometer/

  10. Dong W et al (2012) A differential capacitive accelerometer with four folded springs and changeable area. Adv Mater Res 457–458:1470–1474

  11. Farrar CR, Park G, Allen DW, Todd MD (2006) Sensor network paradigms for structural health monitoring. J Struct Control Health Monit 13:210–225

  12. Gabrielson TB (1993) Mechanical-thermal noise in micromachined acoustic and vibration sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Dev 40(5):903–909

  13. He J, Zhou W, Yu H, He X, Peng P (2018) Structural designing of a MEMS capacitive accelerometer for low temperature coefficient and high linearity. Sensors 18:643

  14. Kavitha S, Daniel RJ, Sumangala K (2013) A simple analytical design approach based on computer aided analysis of bulk micromachined piezoresistive MEMS. Measurement 46:3372–3388

  15. Kavitha S, Daniel RJ, Sumangala K (2016a) Design and analysis of MEMS comb drive capacitive accelerometer for SHM and seismic applications. Measurement 93:327–339

  16. Kavitha S, Daniel RJ, Sumangala K (2016b) High Performance MEMS accelerometers for concrete SHM applications and comparison with COTS Accelerometers. Mech Syst Signal Process 66–67:410–424

  17. Kistler 8330A2.5, Datasheet. https://intertechnology.com/Kistler/pdfs/Accelerometer_Model_8330A2_5.pdf

  18. Li B, Lu D, Wang W (2001) Micromachined accelerometer with area-changed capacitance. Mechatronics 11:811–819

  19. Lynch JP, Partridge A, Law KH, Kenny TW, Kiremidjian AS, Carryer E (2003) Design of piezoresistive MEMS-based accelerometer for integration with wireless sensing unit for structural monitoring. J Aerosp Eng 16:108–114

  20. Lynch JP, Wang Y, Loh K, Yi JH, Yun CB (2006) Wireless structural monitoring of the geumdang bridge using resolution enhancing signal conditioning. In: Procd. 24th Int. Modal Analysis Conf. (IMAC XXIV)

  21. Mistry KK, Swamy KB, Sen S (2010) Design of an SOI-MEMS high resolution capacitive type single axis accelerometer. Microsyst Technol 16:2057–2066

  22. Mohammed Z, Dushaq G, Chatterjee A, Rasras M (2017) An optimization technique for performance improvement of gap-changeable MEMS accelerometers. J Mechatron 54:203–216

  23. Mohammed Z, Elfadel IA, Rasras M (2018) Monolithic multi degree of freedom (MDoF) capacitive MEMS accelerometers. Micromachines 9:602

  24. Pak M, Fernandez FV, Dundar G (2018) A novel design methodology for the mixed-domain optimization of a MEMS accelerometer. Integr VLSI J 62:314–321

  25. Physical-Logic, MAXL-OL-2020, Datasheet. http://physical-logic.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/MAXL-OL-2020-Performance-Datasheet-B06.pdf

  26. Rao K et al (2019) A MEMS micro-g capacitive accelerometer based on through-silicon-wafer-etching process. Micromachines 10:380

  27. Sankar AR, Jency JG, Das S (2012) Design, fabrication and testing of a high performance silicon piezoresistive Z-axis accelerometer with proof mass-edge-aligned-flexures. Microsyst Technol 18:9–23

  28. Silicon Design, INC (1221), Datasheet. https://www.krone.co.jp/pdf/1221.pdf

  29. Suzuki Y et al (2006) Micromachined high-aspect-ratio parylene spring and its application to low-frequency accelerometers. J Microelectromech Syst 15:1364–1370

  30. Wai-Chi W, Azid AA, Majlis BY (2010) Formulation of stiffness constant and effective mass for a folded beam. Achiev Mech 62(5):405–418

  31. Wu W et al (2017) High-sensitivity encoder-like micro area-changed capacitive transducer for a nano-g micro accelerometer. Sensors 17:2158

Download references


The authors express their sincere gratitude to the NPMaSS authorities for the MEMS simulation and design tools provided to NPMaSS MEMS Design centre—Annamalai University and financial support from Digital India Corporation, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India through Visvesvaraya Ph.D. scheme.

Author information

Correspondence to Joseph Daniel Rathnasami.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solai, K., Rathnasami, J.D. & Koilmani, S. Superior performance area changing capacitive MEMS accelerometer employing additional lateral springs for low frequency applications. Microsyst Technol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-020-04776-y

Download citation