Advertisement

Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 25, Issue 12, pp 4685–4692 | Cite as

An improved displacement model for micro-electro-mechanical-system based ultrasonic transducer

  • Moumita Pal
  • N. P. Maity
  • Reshmi MaityEmail author
Technical Paper

Abstract

This paper analyses the electrical capacitance, electrostatic force on the membrane and displacement profile of a silicon nitride based micromachined ultrasonic transducer. These specified parameters are characterized by a proposed simple and compact fringing field model. The proposed model together with the fringing effect of Landau and Lifschitz method well matches the 3-D simulated PZFlex, finite element method (FEM) extracted results. An equivalent capacitor having electrodes’ diameters comparable to their distance are used in modeling the transmitting transducer. This makes the fringing field at the corners of the electrodes prevalent, resulting in excess capacitive effect. This excess capacitance affects the performance parameters. An observable displacement profile is perceived for variation in device structural and physical parameters. The influences of the device parameters and the bias on the variation of the characteristics of the membrane are also analyzed.

Notes

References

  1. Boulmé A, Ngo S, Minonzio JG, Legros M, Talmant M, Laugier P, Certon D (2014) A capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer probe for assessment of cortical bone. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 61(4):710–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen A, Wong L, Na S, Li Z, Macecek M, Yeow J (2016) Fabrication of a curved row-column addressed capacitive michromachined ultrasonic transducer array. IEEE J Microelectromech Syst 25(4):675–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng TC, Tsai TH (2016) CMOS ultrasonic receiver with on-chip analog-to-digital front end for high-resolution ultrasound imaging systems. IEEE Sens J 16(20):7454–7463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gurun G, Tekes C, Zahorian J, Xu T, Satir S, Karaman M, Hasler J, Degertekin FL (2014) Single-Chip CMUT-on-CMOS front-end system for real-time volumetric IVUS and ICE imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 61(2):239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hohlfeld K, Michaelis A, Gebhardt S (2013) Piezoelectric transducers on the basis of free-formed PZT components. IEEE Proc Int Symp Appl Ferroelectr.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAF.2013.6748675 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang W, Kim J, Kim K, Bakshi S, Williams J, Matthieu P, Loboa E, Shung KK, Zhou Q, Jiang X (2016) A novel ultrasound technique for non-invasive assessment of cell differentiation. IEEE Sens J 16(1):61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Landau LD, Lifschitz EM (1987) Electrodynamics of continuous media. Permagon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Maity NP, Maity R, Thapa RK, Baishya S (2016) A tunneling current density model for ultra thin HfO2 high-k dielectric material based MOS devices. Superlattices and Microstruct 95:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maity R, Maity NP, Thapa RK, Baishya S (2017a) An improved analytical and finite element method model of nanoelectromechanical system based micromachined ultrasonic transducers. Microsyst Technol 23(6):2163–2173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maity R, Maity NP, Baishya S (2017b) Circular membrane approximation model with the effect of the finiteness of the electrode’s diameter of MEMS capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers. Microsyst Technol 23(8):3513–3524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maity R, Maity NP, Srinivasa RK, Guha K, Baishya S (2018a) A new compact analytical model of nano-electro-mechanical-systems based capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for pulse echo imaging. J Comput Electron 17:1334–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maity R, Maity NP, Guha K, Baishya S (2018b) Analysis of spring softening effect on the collapse voltage of capacitive MEMS ultrasonic transducers. Microsyst Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-018-4040-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miao J, Wang H, Li P, Shen W, Xue C, Xiong J (2016) Glass-SOI-based hybrid-bonded capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer with hermetic cavities for immersion applications. IEEE J Microelectromech Syst 25(5):976–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mills DM, Smith SW (1999) Multi-layered PZT/polymer composites to increase signal-to-noise ratio and resolution for medical ultrasound transducers. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 46(4):961–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pîslaru-Dănescu L, Lipan LC, Pisică I, Ilina ID, Dumitru A (2014) New energy harvesting systems, designed for new piezoelectric transducers, with charging energy management. IEEE Proc Int Conf Expo Electr Power Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPE.2014.6969989 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yu Y, Pun SH, Mak PU, Cheng CH, Wang J, Mak P, Vai MI (2016) Design of a collapse mode CMUT with an embossed membrane for improving output pressure. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 63(6):854–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang Q, Cicek PV, Allidina K, Nabki F, El-Gamal MN (2014) Surface-micromachined CMUT using low-temperature deposited silicon carbide membranes for above-IC integration. IEEE J Microelectromech Syst 23(2):482–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringMizoram University (A Central University)AizawlIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringJIS College of EngineeringKalyaniIndia

Personalised recommendations