Advertisement

A visual automatic analysis and evaluation method based on virtual reality in microgravity environment

  • Dong ZhouEmail author
  • Qi-Di Zhou
  • Zi-Yue Guo
  • Yu-Shu Xie
Technical Paper
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

To ensure the safety of the astronauts and the prolongation of the life of the space station, maintainability design and verification is an integral part of design process. As a crucial factor in maintainability design, visibility evaluation is the most important part of maintainability design and verification. However, completely different ergonomics parameters and lacking of relevant research are the two major problems limiting the development and application of the visibility design in the microgravity environment. This paper proposes a visibility automation analysis and evaluation model in microgravity environment based on virtual maintenance. Firstly, visibility evaluation indicators are determined by the literature research and the astronauts working condition investigations. Secondly, in responds to the indicators, this paper proposes an evaluation method combining ergonomics and maintainability criteria based on microgravity. Moreover, a comprehensive visual accessibility evaluation model in microgravity environment is developed. Finally, a case of ORU disassembly in space station is conducted and verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Notes

References

  1. Angelini R, Costa MJAA (2002) Multimedial maintenance manuals: international space station applications for on-orbit maintenance support. Acta Astron 51:415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aromaa S, Väänänen K (2016) Suitability of virtual prototypes to support human factors/ergonomics evaluation during the design. Appl Ergon 56:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg LP, Vance JM (2017) Industry use of virtual reality in product design and manufacturing: a survey. Virtual Real 21:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0293-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butina AJ (2001) Managing NASA’s international space station logistics and maintenance program. In: Space technology and applications international forum (STAIF-2000) on space exploration and transportation—journey into the future, Albuquerque, Feb 11–14 2001. Aip conference proceedings, pp 161–169Google Scholar
  5. Coleshill E, Oshinowo L, Rembala R, Bina B, Rey D, Sindelar S (2009) Dextre: Improving maintenance operations on the international space station. Acta Astronaut 64:869–874.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2008.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di PP, Narici MV (2003) Muscles in microgravity: from fibres to human motion. J Biomech 36:403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elia V, Gnoni MG, Lanzilotto A (2016) Evaluating the application of augmented reality devices in manufacturing from a process point of view: an AHP based model. Expert Syst Appl 63:187–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geng J, Li Y, Wang R, Wang Z, Lv C, Zhou DJAA (2017) A virtual maintenance-based approach for satellite assembling and troubleshooting assessment. Acta Astronaut 138:434–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glasauer S, Mittelstaedt H (1998) Perception of spatial orientation in microgravity. Brain Res Rev 28:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gong FM, Gao B, Niu QL (2008) An algorithm for rapidly computing the minimum distance between two objects collision detection. In: Cisp 2008: 1st international congress on image and signal processing, vol 2, proceedings.  https://doi.org/10.1109/cisp.2008.432
  11. Howard BM, Vance JM (2007) Desktop haptic virtual assembly using physically based modelling. Virtual Real 11:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ieronutti L, Chittaro L (2007) Employing virtual humans for education and training in X3D/VRML worlds. Comput Educ 49:93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones PM, Fiedler EM (2010) Human performance in space. Rev Hum Factors Ergon 30:172–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koga K (2000) Gravity cue has implicit effects on human behavior. Aviat Space Environ Med 71:A78–A86Google Scholar
  15. Leone G (1998) The effect of gravity on human recognition of disoriented objects. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 28:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li T, Wei CF, Li W (2016a) Simulation and validation technology of manned spacecraft on-orbit maintenance. Spacecr Environ Eng 33:510–515Google Scholar
  17. Li Z, Yang C, Su C-Y, Deng J, Zhang W (2016b) Vision-based model predictive control for steering of a nonholonomic mobile robot. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 24:553–564Google Scholar
  18. Liu X, Peng G, Liu X, Hou Y (2010) Development of a collaborative virtual maintenance environment with agent technology. J Manuf Syst 29:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morbidi F, Mariottini GL, Prattichizzo D (2010) Brief paper: observer design via Immersion and Invariance for vision-based leader-follower formation control. Automatica 46:148–154MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Nasa (1995) Man-systems integration standards. Publishing on NASAWeb. https://msis.jsc.nasa.gov/Volume1.htm. Accessed July 1995
  21. Patterson LP (2001) On-orbit maintenance operations strategy for the international space station—concept and implementation. In: ElGenk MS (ed) Space technology and applications international forum-2001, vol 552. Aip conference proceedings, pp 139–146Google Scholar
  22. Pouliquen M, Bernard A, Marsot J, Chodorge L (2007) Virtual hands and virtual reality multimodal platform to design safer industrial systems. Comput Ind 58:46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rao Y, Xu BL, Jing T, Zhang F, Zhao X (2017) The current status and future perspectives of virtual maintenance. Proc Comput Sci 107:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanjog J, Karmakar S, Patel T, Chowdhury A (2015) Towards virtual ergonomics: aviation and aerospace. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 87:266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Song Y, Li Z (2012) Research on the evaluation method of aircraft virtual maintenance training based on AHP. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on computer application and system modeling. Atlantis Press.  https://doi.org/10.2991/iccasm.2012.205
  26. Song H, Choi W, Kim H (2016) Robust vision-based relative localization approach using an RGB-depth camera and LiDAR sensor fusion. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63:3725–3736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun X, Gao F, Yuan X, Zhao J (2011) Application of human modeling in multi-crew cockpit design. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tim B (2007) A NASA perspective on maintenance activities and maintenance crews. Kennedy Space Center Publishing NASAWeb. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20120003406. Accessed 13 Nov 2007
  29. Tkatchova S (2018) Commercial space station activities. In: Emerging space markets. Springer, Berlin, pp 73–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55669-6_5
  30. Tong S (2007) Man-machine engineering design and application manual. Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang YP, Dang JW, Yang JY, Wang S (2013) Research on triangular mesh simplification algorithm of virtual object model. In: Applied mechanics and materials. Trans Tech Publ, pp 1410–1414.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.271-272.1410
  32. Wang C, Kang D, Zhao X, Peng L, Zhang C (2016) Extraction of feature points on 3D meshes through data gravitation. In: Intelligent computing theories and application. ICIC 2016. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9772. Springer, Cham.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42294-7_54 Google Scholar
  33. Wang W, Zhang W, Feng W (2017) The astronaut ergonomics assessment methodology in microgravity environment. In: Reliability systems engineering (ICRSE), 2017 second international conference. IEEE, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  34. Xue Q, Sun J, Hao J, Liu M (2018) The research on layout and simulation of human-machine interface in vehicle. In: Digital human modeling. Applications in health, safety, ergonomics, and risk management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 97–108Google Scholar
  35. Yang CH, Wei J, Yao L (2009) Synthetic evaluation of maintenance accessibility for complex equipment based on QFD and D-S theory. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 15:2172–2177Google Scholar
  36. Zarei A, Ghodsi M (2005) Efficient computation of query point visibility in polygons with holes. In: Symposium on computational geometry, pp 314–320Google Scholar
  37. Zeng Y, Shang J, Cao Y, Yang Y (2009) Research on visibility evaluation methods in maintainability design. Eng Graph 1:014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Qi-Di Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Zi-Yue Guo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yu-Shu Xie
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and SystemsBeihang UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Reliability and Systems EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.State Key Defense Science and Technology Laboratory on Reliability and Environmental EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations