Advertisement

Darcy–Forchheimer flow and heat transfer augmentation of a viscoelastic fluid over an incessant moving needle in the presence of viscous dissipation

  • S. Sureshkumar Raju
  • K. Ganesh Kumar
  • Mohammad Rahimi-Gorji
  • Ilyas KhanEmail author
Technical Paper

Abstract

The main focus of the present study is to analyse the effect of viscous dissipation Darcy–Forchheimer flow and heat transfer augmentation of a viscoelastic fluid over an incessant moving needle. The governing partial differential equations of the defined problem are reduced into a set of nonlinear ordinary differential equations using adequate similarity transformations. Obtained set of similarity equations are then solved with the help of efficient numerical method fourth fifth order RKF-45 method. The effects of different flow pertinent parameters on the flow fields like velocity and temperature are shown in the form of graphs and tables. The detailed analysis of the problem is carried out based on the plotted graphs and tables.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to King Faisal University, P.O. 380, Al Aha-31982, Saudi Arabia, for providing the administrative and technical support.

References

  1. Ahmed N, Ali Shah N, Ahmad B, Inayat Ali Shah S, Ulhaq S, Rahimi-Gorji M (2018) Transient MHD convective flow of fractional nanofluid between vertical plates. J Appl Comput Mech.  https://doi.org/10.22055/jacm.2018.26947.1364 Google Scholar
  2. Ariel PD (1994) The flow of a visco-elastic fluid past a porous plate. Acta Mech 107:199–204CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaudhary RC, Jain P (2006) Hall effect on MHD mixed convection flow of a viscoelastic fluid past an infinite vertical porous plate with mass transfer and radiation. Theoret Appl Mech 33:281–309MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chowdhury MK, Islam MN (2000) MHD free convection flow of visco-elastic fluid past an infinite vertical porous plate. Heat Mass Transf 36:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Forchheimer P (1901) Wasserbewegung durch boden. Zeitschrift Ver D Ing 45:1782–1788Google Scholar
  6. Gaffar S, Abdul V, Prasad VR, Bég OA, Hidayathullah MdH, Venkatadri K (2018) Radiative and magnetohydrodynamics flow of third-grade viscoelastic fluid past an isothermal inverted cone in the presence of heat generation/absorption. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40(3):127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayat T, Muhammad T, Al-Mezal S, Liao SJ (2016) Darcy–Forchheimer flow with variable thermal conductivity and Cattaneo-Christov heat flux. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 26:2355–2369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayat T, Haider F, Muhammad T, Alsaedi A (2017) Three-dimensional rotating flow of carbon nanotubes with Darcy–Forchheimer porous medium. PLoS One 12:e0179576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hossain SI, Alam MM (2015) Effects of thermal diffusion on viscoelastic fluid flow through a vertical at plate. Proc Eng 105:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hussanan A, Khan I, Rahimi Gorji M, Khan WA (2019) CNTS-water-based nanofluid over a stretching sheet. BioNanoScience 1:2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-018-0592-6 Google Scholar
  11. Kandelousi, Sheikholeslami M (2014) Effect of spatially variable magnetic field on ferrofluid flow and heat transfer considering constant heat flux boundary condition. Eur Phys J Plus 129(11):248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khuzaimah Soid S, Ishak A, Pop I (2017) Boundary layer flow past a continuously moving thin needle in a nanofluid. Appl Therm Eng 114:58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar KG, Krishnamurthy MR, Rudraswamy NG (2018) Boundary layer flow and melting heat transfer of Prandtl fluid over a stretching surface by considering Joule heating effect. Multidiscip Modeling Mater Struct 1:2.  https://doi.org/10.1108/MMMS-03-2018-0055 Google Scholar
  14. Mabood F, Khan WA, Md Ismail AI (2015) MHD boundary layer flow and heat transfer of nanofluids over a nonlinear stretching sheet: a numerical study. J Magn Magn Mater 374:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muskat M (1946) The flow of homogeneous fluids through porous media. Edwards, IrvineGoogle Scholar
  16. Mustafa M (2015) Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model for rotating flow and heat transfer of upper-convected Maxwell fluid. AIP Adv 5(4):047109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pak BC, Cho YI (1998) Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Exp Heat Transfer 11:151–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pal D, Mondal H (2012) Hydromagnetic convective diffusion of species in Darcy–Forchheimer porous medium with non-uniform heat source/sink and variable viscosity. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 39:913–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pourmehran O, Rahimi-Gorji M, Gorji-Bandpy M, Baou M (2015) Comparison between the volumetric flow rate and pressure distribution for different kinds of sliding thrust bearing. Propuls Power Res 4(2):84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pourmehran O, Rahimi-Gorji M, Ganji DD (2017) Analysis of nanofluid flow in a porous media rotating system between two permeable sheets considering thermophoretic and Brownian motion. Therm Sci 21(5):2057–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seddeek MA (2006) Influence of viscous dissipation and thermophoresis on Darcy–Forchheimer mixed convection in a fluid saturated porous media. J Colloid Interface Sci 293:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shehzad SA, Abbasi FM, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2016) Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model for Darcy–Forchheimer flow of an Oldroyd-B fluid with variable conductivity and non-linear convection. J Mol Liq 224:274–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheikholeslami M (2018) Influence of magnetic field on Al2O3-H2O nanofluid forced convection heat transfer in a porous lid driven cavity with hot sphere obstacle by means of LBM. J Mol Liq 263:472–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sheikholeslami M, Sadoughi M (2017) Mesoscopic method for MHD nanofluid flow inside a porous cavity considering various shapes of nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 113:106–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheikholeslami M, Sadoughi MK (2018) Simulation of CuO-water nanofluid heat transfer enhancement in presence of melting surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf 116:909–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sheikholeslami M, Rana P, Soleimani S (2017) Numerical study of MHD natural convection liquid metal flow and heat transfer in a wavy enclosure using CVFEM. Heat Transfer Res 48(2):121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA, Abbasi FM, Li Z (2018a) Nanofluid flow and forced convection heat transfer due to Lorentz forces in a porous lid driven cubic enclosure with hot obstacle. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 338:491–505MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA, Li Z, Shafee A (2018b) Numerical modeling for alumina nanofluid magnetohydrodynamic convective heat transfer in a permeable medium using Darcy law. Int J Heat Mass Transf 127:614–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sheikholeslami M, Li Z, Shafee A (2018c) Lorentz forces effect on NEPCM heat transfer during solidification in a porous energy storage system. Int J Heat Mass Transf 127:665–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xuan Y, Qiang L (2003) Investigation on convective heat transfer and flow features of nanofluids. J Heat Transfer 125(1):151–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Sureshkumar Raju
    • 1
  • K. Ganesh Kumar
    • 2
  • Mohammad Rahimi-Gorji
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ilyas Khan
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of ScienceKing Faisal UniversityAl AhaSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsSJM Institution of TechnologyChitradurgaIndia
  3. 3.Experimental Surgery Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health ScienceGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  4. 4.Biofluid, Tissue and Solid Mechanics for Medical Applications Lab (IBiTech-bioMMeda)Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium
  5. 5.Faculty of Mathematics and StatisticsTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations