Multi-objective optimization design for a sand crab-inspired compliant microgripper
- 27 Downloads
A large working travel and a minimal stress are the most critical characteristics of a microgripper but they are conflicted each other. This paper develops a new efficient hybrid algorithm to solve the multi-objective optimization design for a sand bubbler crab-inspired compliant microgripper. The structure of sand bubbler crab-inspired compliant microgripper is inspired from the profile of sand bubbler crab. A surrogate-assisted multi-objective optimization is conducted by developing a hybrid approach of finite element analysis, response surface method, Kigring metamodel and multi-objective genetic algorithm. First, the data are collected by integrating the finite element analysis and response surface method. Subsequently, in the types of common surrogates, Kigring metamodel is adopted as an efficient tool to approximate the objective functions. And then, the Pareto-optimal fronts are found via the multi-objective genetic algorithm. The results indicated that the optimal results are at the displacement of 5999.9 µm and stress of 330.68 MPa. The results revealed that the optimized results are highly consistent with both the validation results. The accuracy of the surrogate models showed that the regression model is a good prediction. The proposed approach is useful tool to solve complex optimization designs.
This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under Grant number 107.03-2018.11.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- ANSYS Workbench Software (2016) ANSYS meshing advanced techniques—PADT lunch & learn series. ANSYS Inc.Google Scholar
- Cao L, Dolovich AT, Chen A, Zhang W (2018) Topology optimization of efficient and strong hybrid compliant mechanisms using a mixed mesh of beams and flexure hinges with strength control. Mech Mach Theory 121:213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen W, Qu J, Chen W, Zhang J (2017a) A compliant dual-axis gripper with integrated position and force sensing. Mechatronics 47:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen W, Zhang X, Li H et al (2017b) Nonlinear analysis and optimal design of a novel piezoelectric-driven compliant microgripper. Mech Mach Theory 118:32–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen S, Ling M, Zhang X (2018) Design and experiment of a millimeter-range and high-frequency compliant mechanism with two output ports. Mech Mach Theory 126:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dang MP, Dao TP, Chau NL, Le HG (2019) Effective hybrid algorithm of Taguchi method, FEM, RSM, and teaching learning-based optimization for multiobjective optimization design of a compliant rotary positioning stage for nanoindentation tester. Math Probl Eng 2019:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4191924 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Edin BB, Beccai L, Ascari L et al (2006) A bio-inspired approach for the design and characterization of a tactile sensory system for a cybernetic prosthetic hand. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2006, pp 1354–1358. https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.2006.1641897
- Ling M, Cao J, Jiang Z, Lin J (2018b) A semi-analytical modeling method for the static and dynamic analysis of complex compliant mechanism. Precis Eng 52:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sakhaei AH, Kaijima S, Lee TL et al (2018) Design and investigation of a multi-material compliant ratchet-like mechanism. Mech Mach Theory 121:184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Valentini PP, Pennestrì E (2018) Compliant four-bar linkage synthesis with second-order flexure hinge approximation. Mech Mach Theory 128:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar