Advertisement

Fabricating chambers of inkjet printhead by bonding SU-8 nozzle plate with suitable crosslinked degree

  • Xing Wang
  • Zheng Yang
  • Liping Qi
  • Shixia Yan
  • Shangfei Wang
  • Maocong Yi
  • Xiao Shan
  • Jiangang Zhou
  • Helin ZouEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The process of fabricating chambers is becoming increasingly important for inkjet printhead. However, the majority of present fabrication methods suffer from some problems, such as chamber collapsed, chamber blocked, and the deformation of nozzle plate. This paper develops a novel method for fabricating inkjet chambers by bonding the nozzle plate of SU-8 photoresist with suitable crosslinked degree onto the open microchamber. The softbake temperature of the nozzle plates was optimized for the high bonding strength and the low chamber deformation. The crosslinked degree of the SU-8 photoresist with different exposure dose and post exposure bake (PEB) parameters were calculated based on Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy experiments. The effects of exposure dose and PEB parameters on crosslinked degree of the SU-8 photoresist were analyzed. The influence of crosslinked degree of the SU-8 photoresist on the chamber deformation rate and bonding strength were investigated. The optimized bonding strength of 0.57 MPa and chamber deformation rate of 4.35% were obtained in the final inkjet printhead. Compared with most of the current processing methods, this fabrication technique has great potential due to the decreased chamber deformation rate and the increased bonding strength.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51775088).

References

  1. Abgrall P, Lattes C, Conederal V, Dollat X, Colin S, Gue AM (2006) A novel fabrication method of flexible and monolithic 3D microfluidic structures using lamination of SU-8 films. J Micromech Microeng 16:113–121.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/16/1/016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ail MH, Nasiri NM, Ko WL (2016) Multi-nozzle extrusion system for 3D printer and its control mechanism. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:999–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8205-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumann FW, Kopp O, Roller D (2017) Abstract API for 3D printing hardware and software resources. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:1519–1535.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0260-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen YH, Wang WC, Young KC, Chang TT, Chen SH (1999) Plastic microchip electrophoresis for analysis of PCR products of hepatitis C virus. Clin Chem 45:1938–1943Google Scholar
  5. Cheng YT, Lin LW, Najafi K (2001) A hermetic glass-silicon package formed using localized aluminum/silicon-glass bonding. J Microelectromech Syst 10:392–399.  https://doi.org/10.1109/84.946791 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feng R, Farris RJ (2003) Influence of processing conditions on the thermal and mechanical properties of SU8 negative photoresist coatings. J Micromech Microeng 13:80–88.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/13/1/312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hsu Y-C, Chen T-Y (2007) Applying Taguchi methods for solvent-assisted PMMA bonding technique for static and dynamic μ-TAS devices. Biomed Microdevices 9:513–522.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-007-9059-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keller S, Blagoi G, Lillemose M, Haefliger D, Boisen A (2008) Processing of thin SU-8 films. J Micromech Microeng 18:125020.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/18/12/125020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim DS, Khan A, Ranman K, Khan S, Kim HC, Choi KH (2011) Drop-on-demand direct printing of colloidal copper nanoparticles by electrohydrodynamic atomization. Mater Manuf Process 26:1196–1201.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2011.551956 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ko SH, Pan H, Grigoropoulos CP, Luscombe CK, Frechet JMJ, Poulikakos D (2007) All-inkjet-printed flexible electronics fabrication on a polymer substrate by low-temperature high-resolution selective laser sintering of metal nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 18:345202.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/34/345202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li S, Freidhoff CB, Young RM, Ghodssi R (2003) Fabrication of micronozzles using low-temperature wafer-level bonding with SU-8. J Micromech Microeng 13(5):732–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCormick RM, Nelson RJ, AlonsoAmigo MG, Benvegnu J, Hooper HH (1997) Microchannel electrophoretic separations of DNA in injection-molded plastic substrates. Anal Chem 69:2626–2630.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9701997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Milionis A, Noyes C, Loth E, Bayer IS, Lichtenberger AW, Stathopoulos VN, Vourdas N (2016) Water-repellent approaches for 3-D printed internal passages. Mater Manuf Process 31:1162–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1059443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Robin CJ, Jonnalagadda KN (2016) Effect of size and moisture on the mechanical behavior of SU-8 thin films. J Micromech Microeng 26:025020.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/26/2/025020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Robin CJ, Vishnoi A, Jonnalagadda KN (2014) Mechanical behavior and anisotropy of spin-coated SU-8 thin films for MEMS. J Microelectromech Syst 23:168–180.  https://doi.org/10.1109/jmems.2013.2264341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scordo G, Moscone D, Palleschi G, Arduini F (2018) A reagent-free paper-based sensor embedded in a 3D printing device for cholinesterase activity measurement in serum. Sens Actuators B Chem 258:1015–1021.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.11.134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sensu Y, Sekiguichi A, Kono Y, Mori S, Honda N, Weber WD (2005) Profile simulation of SU-8 thick film resist. J Photopolym Sci Technol 18:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shen SC, Wang MW, Lee CJ (2009) Manufacture of an integrated three-dimensional structure nozzle plate using microinjection molding for a 1200-dpi inkjet printhead. J Microelectromech Syst 18:52–63.  https://doi.org/10.1109/jmems.2008.2009847 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tsao CW, Devoe DL (2009) Bonding of thermoplastic polymer microfluidics. Microfluid Nanofluid 6:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-008-0361-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tuomikoski S, Franssila S (2005) Free-standing SU-8 microfluidic chips by adhesive bonding and release etching. Sens Actuators A Phys 120:408–415.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2005.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Xu Y, Harrison D, Fyson J, Zhang R (2017) Development of 3D printing technology for the manufacture of flexible electric double-layer capacitors. Mater Manuf Process 1401712:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1401712 Google Scholar
  22. Yamaguchi S, Ueno A, Akiyama Y, Morishima K (2012) Cell patterning through inkjet printing of one cell per droplet. Biofabrication 4:045005.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/4/4/045005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yi M, Feng J, Yin Z, Zou H (2017) Fabricating method of SU-8 photoresist conical nozzle for inkjet printhead. Mater Manuf Process 33:898–904.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1364848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang J, Chan-Park MB, Conner SR (2004) Effect of exposure dose on the replication fidelity and profile of very high aspect ratio microchannels in SU-8. Lab Chip 4:646–653.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b403304c CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xing Wang
    • 1
  • Zheng Yang
    • 1
  • Liping Qi
    • 2
  • Shixia Yan
    • 1
  • Shangfei Wang
    • 1
  • Maocong Yi
    • 1
  • Xiao Shan
    • 3
  • Jiangang Zhou
    • 4
  • Helin Zou
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Micro/Nano Technology and Systems of Liaoning ProvinceDalian University of TechnologyDalianPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Mechanical Design and Automation Group, College of China and New Zealand CollaborationDalian Ocean UniversityDalianPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.College of Physics Science and TechnologyDalian UniversityDalianPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations