Numerical simulation of a novel microfluidic electroosmotic micromixer with Cantor fractal structure

  • Zeyang Wu
  • Xueye ChenEmail author
Technical Paper


In this paper, we design a novel low voltage of electroosmotic micromixer with fractal structure. Because of the influence of high voltage on electrode and solution, we propose an electroosmotic micromixer of low voltage. In order to optimize the electrode position, we design the Cantor fractal according to Cantor principle, and arrange the electrode pairs on the fractal. Then we study the mixing effect of the electrode pairs length on the mixing performance, the effect of the electrode position and the effect of fractal electrode group spacing on the mixing efficiency. When the electroosmotic micromixer has three electrode groups at alternating voltage of 5 V and alternating frequency of 8 Hz, the best mixing efficiency can reach 95.2% in one second. We call this micromixer Cantor fractal electroosmotic micromixer (CFEM). At the same Re, the mixing efficiency of CFEM is higher than the electrodeless micromixer 50%.



This work was supported by The Key Project of Department of Education of Liaoning Province (JZL201715401), Liaoning Province BaiQianWan Talent Project. We sincerely thank Prof. Chong Liu for his kind guidance.


  1. Ahmed F, Kim KY (2017) Parametric study of an electroosmotic micromixer with heterogeneous charged surface patches. Micromachines 8(7):199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chau JLH, Leung AYL, Yeung KL (2003) Zeolite micromembranes. Lab Chip 3(2):53–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Xueye, Li Tiechuan (2017) A novel passive micromixer designed by applying an optimization algorithm to the zigzag microchannel. Chem Eng J 313:1406–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen X, Zhang L (2017a) A review on micromixers actuated with magnetic nanomaterials. Microchimica Acta 184(10):3639–3649 (3(3)) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen X, Zhang L (2017b) Review in manufacturing methods of nanochannels of bio-nanofluidic chips. Sens Actuators B Chem 1:1. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen X, Zhao Z (2017) Numerical investigation on layout optimization of obstacles in a three-dimensional passive micromixer. Analytica Chimica Acta 964:142–149 (7(3)) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen H, Zhang Y, Mezic I et al (2003) Numerical simulation of an electroosmotic micromixer. ASME Publ FED 259:653–658Google Scholar
  8. Chen X, Shen J, Hu Z, Huo X (2016a) Manufacturing methods and applications of membranes in microfluidics. Biomed Microdevice 18(6):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen X, Li T, Zeng H, Hu Z, Fu B (2016b) Numerical and experimental investigation on micromixers with serpentine microchannels. Int J Heat Mass Transf 98:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen X, Li T, Shen J et al (2016c) Fractal design of microfluidics and nanofluidics—a review. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 155:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen X, Li T, Shen J, Hu Z (2017) From structures, packaging to application: a system-level review for micro direct methanol fuel cell. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 80:669–678 (6(2)) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forouzanfar S, Talebzadeh N, Zargari S et al (2015) The effect of microchannel width on mixing efficiency of microfluidic electroosmotic mixer. In: Robotics and mechatronics (ICROM), 2015 3rd RSI international conference on. IEEE, 2015, pp 629–634Google Scholar
  13. Green NG, Ramos A, González A et al (2000) Fluid flow induced by nonuniform ac electric fields in electrolytes on microelectrodes. I. Experimental measurements. Phys Rev E 61(4):4011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lu LH, Ryu KS, Liu C (2002) A magnetic microstirrer and array for microfluidic mixing. Microelectromech Syst J 11(5):462–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lu P, Liu X, Zhang C (2017) Electroosmotic flow in a rough nanochannel with surface roughness characterized by fractal Cantor. Micromachines 8(6):190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nimafar M, Viktorov V, Martinelli M (2012) Experimental investigation of split and recombination micromixer in confront with basic T-and O-type micromixers. Int J Mech Appl 2(5):61–69Google Scholar
  17. Niu X, Wen W, Liu L et al (2006) Active microfluidic mixer chip. Appl Phys Lett 88(15):153508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oddy MH, Santiago JG, Mikkelsen JC (2001) Electrokinetic instability micromixing. Anal Chem 73(24):5822–5832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sasaki N, Kitamori T, Kim HB (2010) Experimental and theoretical characterization of an AC electroosmotic micromixer. Anal Sci 26(7):815–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shi YZ, Xiong S, Zhang Y et al (2018a) Sculpting nanoparticle dynamics for single-bacteria-level screening and direct binding-efficiency measurement. Nat Commun 9(1):815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shi Y, Xiong S, Chin LK et al (2018b) Nanometer-precision linear sorting with synchronized optofluidic dual barriers. Sci Adv 4(1):eaao0773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Simonnet C, Groisman A (2005) Chaotic mixing in a steady flow in a microchannel. Phys Rev Lett 94(13):134501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yin Z (2018) Rapid prototyping of PET microfluidic chips by laser ablation and water-soaking bonding method. Micro Nano Lett 13(9):1302–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yin Z, Zou H (2017) Multilayer patterning technique for micro-and nanofluidic chip fabrication. Microfluid Nanofluid 21(12):174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yin Z, Cheng E, Zou H (2018) Fast microfluidic chip fabrication technique by laser erosion and sticky tape assist bonding technique. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 18(6):4082–4086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yoon MS, Kim BJ, Sung HJ (2008) Pumping and mixing in a microchannel using AC asymmetric electrode arrays. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 29(1):269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zadeh HF (2005) Experimental validation of flow and mass transport in an electrically-excited micromixer. Wissenschaftliche Berichte FZKA 7152Google Scholar
  28. Zhou T, Wang H, Shi L et al (2016) An enhanced electroosmotic micromixer with an efficient asymmetric lateral structure. Micromachines 7(12):218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou T, Ge J, Shi L et al (2018a) Dielectrophoretic choking phenomenon of a deformable particle in a converging-diverging microchannel. Electrophoresis 39(4):590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou T, Deng Y, Zhao H et al (2018b) The mechanism of size-based particle separation by dielectrophoresis in the viscoelastic flows. J Fluids Eng 140(9):091302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical Engineer and AutomationLiaoning University of TechnologyJinzhouChina

Personalised recommendations