Advertisement

Determination of the stiffness properties of a complex RF MEMS by superposition and finite elements method

  • M. Cihat YilmazEmail author
  • Sadettin Orhan
Technical Paper
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the deflection and stiffness of a micro cantilever beam with a rectangular notch are derived analytically by considering a non-uniformly distributed load as a cause of deflection, since the shape of a distributed load at the exact collapse time is not uniform in the real scenario. In order to calculate the deflection, due to the design of the beam structure, the superposition method is employed as well as the fundamental principles of mechanics. Moreover, it is also utilized in the subsequent stiffness calculations. Particularly, the stiffness concept is discussed under three different subsets: natural, actuation, and release stiffness, as they are essentials for the switching operations. In addition to the analytical study, FEM simulations are also carried out using CoventorWare in order to compare with the derived models. As the results reveal that accuracies of both the analytical models and simulations are acceptable, this study provides a utilitarian framework for designing different complex MEMS.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work and especially FEM simulation could be done under a huge support of research group of Dr. Mehmet Unlu from TOBB University (Ankara/Turkey).

References

  1. Bansal D, Kumar A, Sharma A, Kumar P, Rangra KJ (2014) Design of novel compact anti-stiction and low insertion loss RF MEMS switch. Microsyst Technol 20(2):337–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barazani B, Warnat S, MacIntosh AJ, Hubbard T (2017) MEMS measurements of single cell stiffness decay due to cyclic mechanical loading. Biomed Microdevice 19(4):77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birleanu C, Pustan M, Dudescu C, Merie V, Pintea I (2017) Analysis of the bending stiffness and adhesion effect in RF-MEMS structures. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 174, no. 1. IOP Publishing, p 012029Google Scholar
  4. Chowdhury S, Ahmadi M, Miller WC (2005) Pull-in voltage calculations for MEMS sensors with cantilevered beams. In: IEEE-NEWCAS conference, 2005. The 3rd international. IEEE, pp 143–146Google Scholar
  5. Fomani AA, Fouladi S, Mansour RR (2010) Magnetically-actuated dielectric cantilever RF MEMS switches. In: Microwave symposium digest (MTT), 2010 IEEE MTT-S international. IEEE, pp 296–299Google Scholar
  6. Gong Y, Zhao F, Xin H, Lin J, Bai Q (2009) Simulation and optimal design for rf mems cantilevered beam switch. In: Future computer and communication, 2009. FCC’09. International conference on. IEEE, pp 84–87Google Scholar
  7. Hibbeler RC (2011) Statics and mechanics of materials, in SI units. Pearson Education, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu L (2007) High performance RF MEMS series contact switch-design and simulations. In: Electronic components and technology conference, 2007. ECTC’07. Proceedings. 57th. IEEE, pp 158–164Google Scholar
  9. Marcelli R, Lucibello A, De Angelis G, Proietti E, Comastri D (2010) Mechanical modelling of capacitive RF MEMS shunt switches. Microsyst Technol 16(7):1057–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Muley CA, Naveed SA (2013) Modelling of cantilever based MEMS RF switch. In: Computing, communications and networking technologies (ICCCNT), 2013 fourth international conference on. IEEE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  11. Patel CD, Rebeiz GM (2011) RF MEMS metal-contact switches with mN-contact and restoring forces and low process sensitivity. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 59(5):1230–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pustan M, Birleanu C, Dudescu C (2017) Nanocharacterization of the adhesion effect and bending stiffness in optical MEMS. Appl Surf Sci 421:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rebeiz GM (2004) RF MEMS: theory, design, and technology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Saba N, Soin N, Khamil KN (2015) Simulation and analysis of actuation voltage of electrostatically actuated RF MEMS cantilever switch. In: Smart sensors and application (ICSSA), 2015 international conference on. IEEE, pp 106–110Google Scholar
  15. Saha SC, Singh T, Sasther T (2005) Design and simulation of RF MEMS cantilever and bridge switches for high switching speed and low voltage operation and their comparison. In: Signals, circuits and systems, 2005. ISSCS 2005. International symposium on (vol 1). IEEE, pp 131–134Google Scholar
  16. Saha SC, Hanke U, Jensen GU, Saether T (2006) Modeling of spring constant and pull-down voltage of non uniform RF MEMS cantilever. In: Behavioral modeling and simulation workshop, proceedings of the 2006 IEEE international. IEEE, pp 56–60Google Scholar
  17. Siahpour S, Zand MM, Mousavi M (2018) Dynamics and vibrations of particle-sensing MEMS considering thermal and electrostatic actuation. Microsyst Technol 24(3):1545–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Singh T, Pashaie F (2015) Finite element modeling of a Ti based compact RF MEMS series switch design for harsh environment. Microsyst Technol 21(10):2115–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wai-Chi W, Azid AA, Majlis BY (2010) Formulation of stiffness constant and effective mass for a folded beam. Arch Mech 62(5):405–418zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang Z, Chow L, Volakis JL, Saitou K, Kurabayashi K (2005) Contact physics modeling and optimization design of RF-MEMS cantilever switches. In: Antennas and propagation society international symposium, 2005 IEEE (vol 1). IEEE, pp 81–84Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentAnkara Yildirim Beyazit UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations