Advertisement

Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 461–475 | Cite as

Investigation of nonlinear dynamic behavior of a capacitive carbon nano-tube based electromechanical switch considering van der Waals force

  • Hamed MobkiEmail author
  • Ghader Rezazadeh
  • Afsoon Vefaghi
  • Majid Vatankhah Moradi
Technical Paper
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, nonlinear dynamic behavior of a capacitive carbon nano-tube switch is investigated considering van der Waals (vdW) force. The carbon nano-tube is considered as a nano-beam and dynamic equation of motion for this switch is presented based on the Euler–Bernoulli beam model. In order to simplify the bifurcation analysis of the carbon nano-switch, dynamic equation based on the modified mass–damper–spring model has been extracted. The fixed points of the switch have been studied in the absence and presence of the electrostatic force. Global and local criterion for stability study of the nano switch is employed. In order to study the local stability of the fixed points, the associated eigenvalues were extracted and the stability of these points was identified. For studying global stability, motion trajectories of the switch with and without considering damping effect are provided and presented. Basin of attraction set and region of periodic set and dependency of them on the applied voltage, as well as the vdW force and damping effect are investigated. Critical values of the applied voltage and vdW parameter leading to qualitative changes in the nano switch behavior through a saddle node bifurcation are obtained.

Notes

References

  1. Afrang S, Mobki H, Sadeghi MH, Rezazadeh G (2015) A new MEMS based variable capacitor with wide tunability, high linearity and low actuation voltage. Microelectron J 46(2):191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ananthasuresh GK, Gupta RK, Senturia SD (1996) An approach to macromodeling of MEMS for nonlinear dynamic simulation. In: Proceedings of the ASME international conference of mechanical engineering congress and exposition (MEMS), Atlanta, GA, 1996, pp 401–407Google Scholar
  3. Azizi A, Mobki H, Rezazadeh G (2016) Bifurcation behavior of a capacitive micro-beam suspended between two conductive plates. Int J Sens Netw Data Commun 5(149):1–10Google Scholar
  4. Chang T, Gao H (2003) Size-dependent elastic properties of a single-walled carbon nanotube via a molecular mechanics model. J Mech Phys Solids 51(6):1059–1074CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Dequesnes M, Rotkin SV, Aluru NR (2002) Calculation of pull-in voltages for carbon-nanotube-based nanoelectromechanical switches. Nanotechnology 13(1):120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fakhrabadi MMS, Khorasani PK, Rastgoo A, Ahmadian MT (2013) Molecular dynamics simulation of pull-in phenomena in carbon nanotubes with Stone–Wales defects. Solid State Commun 157:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fakhrabadi MMS, Rastgoo A, Ahmadian MT (2014) Fluid-solid interaction in electrostatically actuated carbon nanotubes. J Mech Sci Technol 28(4):1431–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farrokhabadi A, Koochi A, Abadyan M (2014) Modeling the instability of CNT tweezers using a continuum model. Microsyst Technol 20(2):291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354(6348):56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kacem N, Baguet S, Hentz S, Dufour R (2011) Computational and quasi-analytical models for non-linear vibrations of resonant MEMS and NEMS sensors. Int J Nonlinear Mech 46(3):532–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ke CH, Pugno N, Peng B, Espinosa HD (2005) Experiments and modeling of carbon nanotube-based NEMS devices. J Mech Phys Solids 53(6):1314–1333CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Keivani M, Koochi A, Sedighi HM, Abadian A, Abadyan M (2016) A nonlinear model for incorporating the coupled effects of surface energy and microstructure on the electromechanical stability of NEMS. Arab J Sci Eng 41(11):4397–4410MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Khadem SE, Rasekh M, Toghraee A (2012) Design and simulation of a carbon nanotube-based adjustable nano-electromechanical shock switch. Appl Math Model 36(6):2329–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koochi A, Sedighi HM, Abadyan M (2014) Modeling the size dependent pull-in instability of beam-type NEMS using strain gradient theory. Lat Am J Solids Struct 11(10):1806–1829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin WH, Zhao YP (2003) Dynamic behaviour of nanoscale electrostatic actuators. Chin Phys Lett 20(11):2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin WH, Zhao YP (2005a) Nonlinear behavior for nanoscale electrostatic actuators with Casimir force. Chaos Solitons Fractals 23(5):1777–1785CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin WH, Zhao YP (2005b) Casimir effect on the pull-in parameters of nanometer switches. Microsyst Technol 11(2–3):80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mobki H, Sadeghi MH, Afrang S, Rezazadeh G (2011) On the tunability of a MEMS based variable capacitor with a novel structure. Microsyst Technol 17(9):1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mobki H, Rezazadeh G, Sadeghi M, Vakili-Tahami F, Seyyed-Fakhrabadi MM (2013) A comprehensive study of stability in an electro-statically actuated micro-beam. Int J Nonlinear Mech 48:78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mobki H, Sadeghi MH, Rezazadeh G, Fathalilou M (2014) Nonlinear behavior of a nano-scale beam considering length scale-parameter. Appl Math Model 38(5–6):1881–1895MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Nayfeh AH, Balachandran B (2008) Applied nonlinear dynamics: analytical, computational and experimental methods. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Patel AM, Joshi AY (2017) Characterizing the nonlinear behaviour of double walled carbon nanotube based nano mass sensor. Microsyst Technol 23(6):1879–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rashvand K, Rezazadeh G, Mobki H, Ghayesh MH (2013) On the size-dependent behavior of a capacitive circular micro-plate considering the variable length-scale parameter. Int J Mech Sci 77:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rezazadeh G, Vakili-Tahami F, Mobki H, Seyyed Fakhrabadi MM, Alizadeh A (2010) Static and dynamic pull-in phenomena of a capacitive carbon nano tube. In: 18th annual international conference on mechanical engineering-ISME 2010, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, 11–13 MayGoogle Scholar
  25. Sedighi HM, Daneshmand F (2014) Static and dynamic pull-in instability of multi-walled carbon nanotube probes by He’s iteration perturbation method. J Mech Sci Technol 28(9):3459–3469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sedighi HM, Farjam N (2017) A modified model for dynamic instability of CNT based actuators by considering rippling deformation, tip-charge concentration and Casimir attraction. Microsyst Technol 23(6):2175–2191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sedighi HM, Moory-Shirbani M, Shishesaz M, Koochi A, Abadyan M (2016) Size-dependent dynamic behavior and instability analysis of nano-scale rotational varactor in the presence of Casimir attraction. Int J Appl Mech 8(02):1650018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thostenson ET, Ren Z, Chou TW (2001) Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Compos Sci Technol 61(13):1899–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vaccarini L, Goze C, Henrard L, Hernandez E, Bernier P, Rubio A (2000) Mechanical and electronic properties of carbon and boron–nitride nanotubes. Carbon 38(11–12):1681–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vakili-Tahami F, Mobki H, Keyvani-Janbahan AA, Rezazadeh G (2009) Pull-in phenomena and dynamic response of a capacitive nano-beam switch. Sens Transducers 110(11):26Google Scholar
  31. Wang Q, Varadan VK (2006) Wave characteristics of carbon nanotubes. Int J Solids Struct 43(2):254–265CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang KF, Wang BL (2014) Influence of surface energy on the non-linear pull-in instability of nano-switches. Int J Nonlinear Mech 59:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang KF, Wang BL (2015) A general model for nano-cantilever switches with consideration of surface effects and nonlinear curvature. Phys E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct 66:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang KF, Kitamura T, Wang B (2015) Nonlinear pull-in instability and free vibration of micro/nanoscale plates with surface energy—a modified couple stress theory model. Int J Mech Sci 99:288–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang KF, Wang B, Zhang C (2017a) Surface energy and thermal stress effect on nonlinear vibration of electrostatically actuated circular micro-/nanoplates based on modified couple stress theory. Acta Mech 228(1):129–140MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang KF, Zeng S, Wang BL (2017b) Large amplitude free vibration of electrically actuated nanobeams with surface energy and thermal effects. Int J Mech Sci 131:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang KF, Wang BL, Zeng S (2017c) Small scale effect on the pull-in instability and vibration of graphene sheets. Microsyst Technol 23(6):2033–2041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yazdanpanahi E, Noghrehabadi A, Ghalambaz M (2014) Pull-in instability of electrostatic doubly clamped nano actuators: introduction of a balanced liquid layer (BLL). Int J Nonlinear Mech 58:128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang Y, Zhao YP (2006) Numerical and analytical study on the pull-in instability of micro-structure under electrostatic loading. Sens Actuators A 127(2):366–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamed Mobki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ghader Rezazadeh
    • 2
  • Afsoon Vefaghi
    • 2
  • Majid Vatankhah Moradi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran

Personalised recommendations