Advertisement

Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 487–497 | Cite as

Laterally vibrating MEMS resonant vacuum sensor based on cavity-SOI process for evaluation of wide range of sealed cavity pressure

  • Cong LiuEmail author
  • Joerg Froemel
  • Jianlin Chen
  • Takashiro Tsukamoto
  • Shuji Tanaka
Technical Paper
  • 131 Downloads

Abstract

This paper reports a laterally vibrating MEMS resonant vacuum sensor which senses ambient pressure based on the squeeze-film damping effect. The single-anchored double-ended tuning fork structure is proposed to minimize anchor loss and thermoelastic dissipation. The squeeze-film damping gap width is designed to be changeable for the purpose of adjusting the squeeze-film damping effect at different gas pressure. By making the squeeze-film damping dominant and suppressing other energy loss mechanisms, the low pressure end of detectable range is enlarged and as the result a wider detectable pressure range can be achieved. The resonator was fabricated by cavity silicon-on-insulator technique for the purpose of design and fabrication flexibility, and was characterized in a vacuum chamber. The proposed sensor can sense the air pressure at relatively high quality factor from around 60 to 30,000 in the range of 1000–1 Pa. The structure design and fabrication is compatible with standard MEMS processes and provides a path towards the application for the evaluation of the vacuum level of sealed micro-size cavities for wafer level integration.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was partly supported by a project commissioned by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO). The author, Cong Liu, thanks the China Scholarship Council (CSC) (no. 201506120054) for scholarship support.

References

  1. Andrews M, Harris I, Turner G (1993) A comparison of squeeze-film theory with measurements on a microstructure. Sens Actuators A 36:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao M, Yang H (2007) Squeeze film air damping in MEMS. Sens Actuators A 136:3–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2007.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng Y-T, Hsu W-T, Najafi K, Nguyen C-C, Lin L (2002) Vacuum packaging technology using localized aluminum/silicon-to-glass bonding. J Microelectromech Syst 11:556–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolleman RJ, Davidovikj D, Cartamil-Bueno SJ, van der Zant HS, Steeneken PG (2015) Graphene squeeze-film pressure sensors. Nano Lett 16:568–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frömel J, Billep D, Gessner T, Wiemer M (2006) Application of micromechanical resonant structures for measuring the sealing of bonded sensor systems. Microsyst Technol 12:481–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Graham AB et al (2010) A method for wafer-scale encapsulation of large lateral deflection MEMS devices. J Microelectromech Syst 19:28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang Y, Ergun AS, Haeggstrom E, Badi MH, Khuri-Yakub BT (2003) Fabricating capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers with wafer-bonding technology. J Microelectromech Syst 12:128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hutcherson S, Ye W (2004) On the squeeze-film damping of micro-resonators in the free-molecule regime. J Micromech Microeng 14:1726–1733.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/14/12/018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kainz A, Hortschitz W, Stifter M, Schalko J, Keplinger F (2014) Optimization of passive air damping of MOEMS vibration sensors. Procedia Eng 87:440–443.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kainz A, Hortschitz W, Schalko J, Jachimowicz A, Keplinger F (2015) Air damping as design feature in lateral oscillators. Sens Actuators A 236:357–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2015.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumar L et al (2015) MEMS oscillating squeeze-film pressure sensor with optoelectronic feedback. J Micromech Microeng 25:045011.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/25/4/045011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee B, Seok S, Chun K (2003) A study on wafer level vacuum packaging for MEMS devices. J Micromech Microeng 13:663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee JEY, Zhu Y, Seshia AA (2008) A bulk acoustic mode single-crystal silicon microresonator with a high-quality factor. J Micromech Microeng 18:064001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/18/6/064001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Legtenberg R, Tilmans HA (1994) Electrostatically driven vacuum-encapsulated polysilicon resonators. Part I: Design and fabrication. Sens Actuators A 45:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li P, Fang Y (2010) A molecular dynamics simulation approach for the squeeze-film damping of MEMS devices in the free molecular regime. J Micromech Microeng 20:035005.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/20/3/035005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu C, Hirano H, Froemel J, Tanaka S (2017) Wafer-level vacuum sealing using AgAg thermocompression bonding after fly-cut planarization. Sens Actuators A 261:210–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2017.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mol L, Rocha LA, Cretu E, Wolffenbuttel RF (2009) Squeezed film damping measurements on a parallel-plate MEMS in the free molecule regime. J Micromech Microeng 19:074021.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/19/7/074021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodriguez J et al (2017) Wide-range temperature dependence studies for devices limited by thermoelastic dissipation and anchor damping. In: Solid-state sensors, actuators and microsystems (TRANSDUCERS), 2017 19th international conference on, 2017. IEEE, pp 1100–1103Google Scholar
  19. Shao L, Palaniapan M (2008) Effect of etch holes on quality factor of bulk-mode micromechanical resonators. Electron Lett 44:938–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Southworth DR, Craighead HG, Parpia JM (2009) Pressure dependent resonant frequency of micromechanical drumhead resonators. Appl Phys Lett 94:213506.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3141731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanaka S (2014) Wafer-level hermetic MEMS packaging by anodic bonding and its reliability issues. Microelectron Reliab 54:875–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Trusov AA, Shkel AM (2007) Capacitive detection in resonant MEMS with arbitrary amplitude of motion. J Micromech Microeng 17:1583–1592.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/17/8/022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Trusov AA, Schofield AR, Shkel AM (2011) Micromachined rate gyroscope architecture with ultra-high quality factor and improved mode ordering. Sens Actuators A 165:26–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2010.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Waelti M, Schneeberger N, Paul O, Baltes H (1998) Package quality testing using integrated pressure sensor. In: Proceedings-SPIE the International Society for Optical Engineering, 1998. SPIE International Society for Optical, pp 0981–0986Google Scholar
  25. Welham CJ, Gardner JW, Greenwood J (1996) A laterally driven micromachined resonant pressure sensor. Sens Actuators A 52:86–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zotov SA, Simon BR, Prikhodko IP, Trusov AA, Shkel AM (2014) Quality factor maximization through dynamic balancing of tuning fork resonator. IEEE Sens J 14:2706–2714CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Robotics, Graduate School of EngineeringTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.Microsystem Integration CenterTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  3. 3.WPI Advanced Institute for Materials ResearchTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations