Height analysis of the air-oil interfaces in the non-operating and operating FDBs in a tied shaft of HDDs

Technical Paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

We proposed a method to predict the heights of upper and lower air-oil interfaces of the non-operating and operating fluid dynamic bearings (FDBs) in the tied shaft of hard disk drives. To predict the height of upper and lower air-oil interfaces, we formulated the linear pressure and volume equations in both cases of non-operating and operating conditions, respectively. The initial heights of upper and lower air-oil interfaces are determined by pressure and volume equations during non-operating condition. Pressure equation consists of capillary pressure, atmospheric pressure, hydrostatic pressure and applied pressure, and volume equation consists of the volumes of the clearance and the injected oil. In case of operating condition, hydrodynamic pressure generated by grooved bearings is additionally considered in the pressure equation, because heights of air-oil interfaces vary due to hydrodynamic pressure during operating condition. The linear pressure and volume equations were solved simultaneously to calculate the heights of upper and lower air-oil interfaces both in non-operating and operating conditions. In case of non-operating conditions, the height of upper air-oil interface increases with the increase of pressure difference because pressure of lower air-oil interface is higher than that of upper air-oil interface. Since the volume of injected oil is constant, height of lower air-oil interface decreases due to pressure difference. In case of operating conditions, the height of upper air-oil interface decreases according to rotating speed because more oil flows inside the FDBs and recirculation channel than upper seal. On the other hand, the height of the lower air-oil interface increases because volume variation of the oil due to the increase of the flying height is smaller than that due to the decrease of the height of the upper air-oil interface. Finally, we verified the proposed method by measuring the height of upper air-oil interface both in the non-operating and operating conditions.

References

  1. Andres LS, Delgado A (2012) A novel bulk-flow model for improved predictions of force coefficients in grooved oil seals operating eccentrically. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 134:052509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard JH, Steven RS, Bo OJ (1994) Fundamentals of fluid film lubrication. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Feng M, Li C (2013) Characteristics of axial and radial surface tension sealing structures for HDD FDB spindles. IEEE Trans Magn 49:2521–2525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hishida N, Hirayama T, Hashimoto M, Matsuoka T (2010) Analysis and experimental study on oil leakage from fluid bearing. Int J Surf Sci Eng 4:121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jung KM, Jang GH (2011) Axial shock-induced motion of the air-oil interface of fluid dynamic bearings of a non-operating hard disk drive. IEEE Trans Magn 47:1911–1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jung KM, Jang GH, Kim JH (2012) Behavior of fluid lubricant and air–oil interface of operating FDBs due to operating condition and seal design. Microsyst Technol 18:1373–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jung KM, Lee JH, Jung YH, Jang HK, Jang GH (2013) Behavior analysis of air bubbles in the oil lubricant of FDBs at low speed operating conditions. Microsyst Technol 19:1475–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kang CH, Jung YH, Lee JH, Lee MH, Kim BC, Kang GH (2016) Dynamic behavior of air-oil interface in fluid dynamic bearings with a double sealing structure in a 2.5″ hard disk drive due to non-operating axial shock. Tribol Int 98:306–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kita H, Matsuoka K, Obata S, Noda H (2002) Prediction method of oil leakage of FDBs using numerical analysis. Microsyst Technol 8:250–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee MH, Lee JH, Kang CH, Kim KB, Jang HK, Kim BC, Kang GH (2016) Prediction of the oil injection time of FDBs in an HDD spindle motor with a tied shaft by utilizing Kirchhoff’s pressure law. Microsyst Technol 22:1241–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Park CH, Lee DH, Jung IY, Jun SO (2016) Prediction of air-oil interface location in tied-shaft type fluid dynamic bearings. J Mech Sci Technol 30:4247–4257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roger Ku CP, Shumway M (1998) Experimental investigation of shock responses of cantilever-shaft design hydrodynamic bearing spindle motors. IEEE Trans Magn 34:1913–1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wei C, Hong JH, Hu J (2011) Analysis and experimental study on the characteristics of leakage of rotary seal using sealing ring. Adv Materials Res 301–303:573–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. White FM (1999) Fluid mechanics. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New DelhiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PREM, Department of Mechanical Convergence EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations