Advertisement

Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 26–32 | Cite as

Local anesthetic spread into the paravertebral space with two types of quadratus lumborum blocks: a crossover volunteer study

  • Takahiro TamuraEmail author
  • Shuichi Yokota
  • Shigeki Ito
  • Yasuyuki Shibata
  • Kimitoshi Nishiwaki
Original Article
  • 191 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Previous work showed that 20 mL of local anesthetic (LA) did not spread into the paravertebral space (PVS) via the intramuscular quadratus lumborum block (QLBi). If spread of LA into the PVS can be achieved by increasing the total LA volume, QLBi can be more effective. We hypothesized that a larger volume of LA for the QLBi would spread into the PVS.

Methods

This crossover volunteer study included five healthy men. For comparison, both the ultrasound-guided QLB type 2 (QLB2) and QLBi were employed on opposite sides of each volunteer, and the spread of LA solution (0.7 mL/kg) mixed with contrast media in the PVS was assessed 1 h after the first injection using magnetic resonance imaging. Sensory loss was evaluated by pinprick 90 min post-injection. Each volunteer underwent both QLB types, and the same procedures were administered on opposite sides 7 days after the first experiment.

Results

In total, 20 QLB blocks (10 QLB2 and 10 QLBi) were performed. LA did not spread into the PVS after the QLBi. The sensory block area included the lower abdomen after the QLB2, but not after the QLBi. The sensory block area did not extend to the upper abdominal region or the midline of the lower abdomen with either block method.

Conclusion

LA administered by the QLB2 spreads into the PVS of T10–T12, resulting in lower and lateral abdominal sensory loss. In contrast, LA administered by the QLBi does not spread into the PVS and results in only lateral abdominal sensory loss.

Keywords

Quadratus lumborum block Paravertebral space Volunteer study Local anesthetic spread 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Shusaku Baba, Atsushi Okamoto, Kenta Miyazaki, Hiroshi Usami, and Yohei Nishino for providing assistance with our nerve block maneuver. We also thank Koji Suzuki and Yusuke Kusaka for providing assistance with skiagraphy.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Elsharkawy H. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block: how do I do it? ASRA News. 2015;15:33–40.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blanco R, Ansari T, Girgis E. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32:812–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murouchi T, Iwasaki S, Yamakage M. Quadratus lumborum block: analgesic effects and chronological ropivacaine concentrations after laparoscopic surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:146–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Öksüz G, Bilal B, Gürkan Y, Urfalioğlu A, Arslan M, Gişi G, Öksüz H. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block in children undergoing low abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42:674–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carney J, Finnerty O, Rauf J, Bergin D, Laffey JG, Mc Donnell JG. Studies on the spread of local anesthetic solution in transversus abdominis plane blocks. Anesthesia. 2011;66:1023–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murouchi T. Reply to Dr El-Boghdadly et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murouchi T. Quadratus lumborum block intramuscular approach for pediatric surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2016;54:135–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tamura T, Kitamura K, Yokota S, Ito S, Shibata Y, Nishiwaki K. Spread of quadratus lumborum block to the paravertebral space via intramuscular injection: a volunteer study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:372–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blanco R, Ansari T, Riad W, Shetty N. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:757–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Griffiths JD, Barron FA, Grant S, Bjorksten AR, Hebbard P, Royse CF. Plasma ropivacaine concentrations after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:853–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffiths JD, Le NV, Grant S, Bjorksten A, Hebbard P, Royse C. Symptomatic local anesthetic toxicity and plasma ropivacaine concentrations after transversus abdominis plane block for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:996–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Kolli S, Esa WAS, DeGrande S, Soliman LM, Drake RL. Injectate spread following anterior sub-costal and posterior approaches to the quadratus lumborum block: a comparative cadaveric study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34:587–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schuenke MD, Vleeming A, Van Hoof T, Willard FH. A description of the lumbar interfascial triangle and its relation with the lateral raphe: anatomical constituents of load transfer through the lateral margin of the thoracolumbar fascia. J Anat. 2012;221:568–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R. The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat. 2012;221:507–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Loukas M, Shoja MM, Thurston T, Jones VL, Linganna S, Tubbs RS. Anatomy and biomechanics of the vertebral aponeurosis part of the posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008;30:125–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bogduk N, Macintosh JE. The applied anatomy of the thoracolumbar fascia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984;9:164–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kommuru H, Jothi S, Bapuji P, Sree DL, Antony J. Thoracic part of sympathetic chain and its branching pattern variations in South Indian cadavers. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:Ac09–12.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Naidoo N, Partab P, Pather N, Moodley J, Singh B, Satyapal KS. Thoracic splanchnic nerves: implications for splanchnic denervation. J Anat. 2001;199:585–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cummings KW, Sridhar S, Parsons MS, Javidan-Nejad C, Bhalla S. Cross-sectional imaging anatomy and pathologic conditions affecting thoracic nerves. Radiographics. 2017;37:73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marhofer D, Marhofer P, Kettner SC, Fleischmann E, Prayer D, Schernthaner M, Lackner E, Willschke H, Schwetz P, Zeitlinger M. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the spread of local anesthetic solution after ultrasound-guided lateral thoracic paravertebral blockade: a volunteer study. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:1106–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tamura T, Kitamura K, Yokota S, Ito S, Shibata Y, Adachi YU, Nishiwaki K. Reply to Drs El-Boghdadly and Elsharkawy. Reg Anesth Pain. 2018;43:558–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Division of AnesthesiaJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi HospitalNagoyaJapan
  3. 3.Division of Diagnostic RadiologyJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi HospitalNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations